Why Are Some <named-content content-type="genus-species">Listeria monocytogenes</named-content> Genotypes More Likely To Cause Invasive (Brain, Placental) Infection?

ABSTRACT Although all isolates of the foodborne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes are considered to be pathogenic, epidemiological evidence indicates that certain serovar 4b lineages are more likely to cause severe invasive (neuromeningeal, maternal-fetal) listeriosis. Recently described as L. monocyt...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: José A. Vázquez-Boland, Martin Wagner, Mariela Scortti
Format: article
Langue:EN
Publié: American Society for Microbiology 2020
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:https://doaj.org/article/80196cb4ce5b4d8ba8ecdb36b9f22eed
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
Description
Résumé:ABSTRACT Although all isolates of the foodborne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes are considered to be pathogenic, epidemiological evidence indicates that certain serovar 4b lineages are more likely to cause severe invasive (neuromeningeal, maternal-fetal) listeriosis. Recently described as L. monocytogenes “hypervirulent” clones, no distinctive bacterial trait has been identified so far that could account for the differential pathogenicity of these strains. Here, we discuss some preliminary observations in experimentally infected mice suggesting that serovar 4b hypervirulent strains may have a hitherto unrecognized capacity for prolonged in vivo survival. We propose the hypothesis that protracted survivability in primary infection foci in liver and spleen—the first target organs after intestinal translocation—may cause L. monocytogenes serovar 4b hypervirulent clones to have a higher probability of secondary dissemination to brain and placenta.