Incorporating inter-individual variability in experimental design improves the quality of results of animal experiments.

Inter-individual variability in quantitative traits is believed to potentially inflate the quality of results in animal experimentation. Yet, to our knowledge this effect has not been empirically tested. Here we test whether inter-individual variability in emotional response within mouse inbred stra...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marloes H van der Goot, Marieke Kooij, Suzanne Stolte, Annemarie Baars, Saskia S Arndt, Hein A van Lith
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/802445e738a34f1a912d98f307d21533
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:802445e738a34f1a912d98f307d21533
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:802445e738a34f1a912d98f307d215332021-12-02T20:18:40ZIncorporating inter-individual variability in experimental design improves the quality of results of animal experiments.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0255521https://doaj.org/article/802445e738a34f1a912d98f307d215332021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255521https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Inter-individual variability in quantitative traits is believed to potentially inflate the quality of results in animal experimentation. Yet, to our knowledge this effect has not been empirically tested. Here we test whether inter-individual variability in emotional response within mouse inbred strains affects the outcome of a pharmacological experiment. Three mouse inbred strains (BALB/c, C57BL/6 and 129S2) were behaviorally characterized through repeated exposure to a mild aversive stimulus (modified Hole Board, five consecutive trials). A multivariate clustering procedure yielded two multidimensional response types which were displayed by individuals of all three strains. We show that systematic incorporation of these individual response types in the design of a pharmacological experiment produces different results from an experimental pool in which this variation was not accounted for. To our knowledge, this is the first study that empirically confirms that inter-individual variability affects the interpretation of behavioral phenotypes and may obscure experimental results in a pharmacological experiment.Marloes H van der GootMarieke KooijSuzanne StolteAnnemarie BaarsSaskia S ArndtHein A van LithPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 8, p e0255521 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Marloes H van der Goot
Marieke Kooij
Suzanne Stolte
Annemarie Baars
Saskia S Arndt
Hein A van Lith
Incorporating inter-individual variability in experimental design improves the quality of results of animal experiments.
description Inter-individual variability in quantitative traits is believed to potentially inflate the quality of results in animal experimentation. Yet, to our knowledge this effect has not been empirically tested. Here we test whether inter-individual variability in emotional response within mouse inbred strains affects the outcome of a pharmacological experiment. Three mouse inbred strains (BALB/c, C57BL/6 and 129S2) were behaviorally characterized through repeated exposure to a mild aversive stimulus (modified Hole Board, five consecutive trials). A multivariate clustering procedure yielded two multidimensional response types which were displayed by individuals of all three strains. We show that systematic incorporation of these individual response types in the design of a pharmacological experiment produces different results from an experimental pool in which this variation was not accounted for. To our knowledge, this is the first study that empirically confirms that inter-individual variability affects the interpretation of behavioral phenotypes and may obscure experimental results in a pharmacological experiment.
format article
author Marloes H van der Goot
Marieke Kooij
Suzanne Stolte
Annemarie Baars
Saskia S Arndt
Hein A van Lith
author_facet Marloes H van der Goot
Marieke Kooij
Suzanne Stolte
Annemarie Baars
Saskia S Arndt
Hein A van Lith
author_sort Marloes H van der Goot
title Incorporating inter-individual variability in experimental design improves the quality of results of animal experiments.
title_short Incorporating inter-individual variability in experimental design improves the quality of results of animal experiments.
title_full Incorporating inter-individual variability in experimental design improves the quality of results of animal experiments.
title_fullStr Incorporating inter-individual variability in experimental design improves the quality of results of animal experiments.
title_full_unstemmed Incorporating inter-individual variability in experimental design improves the quality of results of animal experiments.
title_sort incorporating inter-individual variability in experimental design improves the quality of results of animal experiments.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/802445e738a34f1a912d98f307d21533
work_keys_str_mv AT marloeshvandergoot incorporatinginterindividualvariabilityinexperimentaldesignimprovesthequalityofresultsofanimalexperiments
AT mariekekooij incorporatinginterindividualvariabilityinexperimentaldesignimprovesthequalityofresultsofanimalexperiments
AT suzannestolte incorporatinginterindividualvariabilityinexperimentaldesignimprovesthequalityofresultsofanimalexperiments
AT annemariebaars incorporatinginterindividualvariabilityinexperimentaldesignimprovesthequalityofresultsofanimalexperiments
AT saskiasarndt incorporatinginterindividualvariabilityinexperimentaldesignimprovesthequalityofresultsofanimalexperiments
AT heinavanlith incorporatinginterindividualvariabilityinexperimentaldesignimprovesthequalityofresultsofanimalexperiments
_version_ 1718374236718891008