The Case for Co-production in Singapore's Mental Healthcare
For better or worse, there exists a power differential between psychiatrists and their patients in mental healthcare. Co-production was proposed to be the “third space” to offer truce between the professional-patient tension in mental healthcare. In Singapore, co-production is a new, but growing, ap...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/807875b91b444e448276b301054161bf |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | For better or worse, there exists a power differential between psychiatrists and their patients in mental healthcare. Co-production was proposed to be the “third space” to offer truce between the professional-patient tension in mental healthcare. In Singapore, co-production is a new, but growing, approach to mental healthcare service delivery. In this commentary, we argue that co-production is not just a novel way to provide service, but a moral imperative. Recovery Colleges and its adoption in Singapore is discussed in some detail to highlight how co-production may be applied in practice. |
|---|