Investigating sources of inaccuracy in wearable optical heart rate sensors

Abstract As wearable technologies are being increasingly used for clinical research and healthcare, it is critical to understand their accuracy and determine how measurement errors may affect research conclusions and impact healthcare decision-making. Accuracy of wearable technologies has been a hot...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brinnae Bent, Benjamin A. Goldstein, Warren A. Kibbe, Jessilyn P. Dunn
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/80ba2cc27bce46bf8b4662d44edc2cff
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:80ba2cc27bce46bf8b4662d44edc2cff
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:80ba2cc27bce46bf8b4662d44edc2cff2021-12-02T11:02:18ZInvestigating sources of inaccuracy in wearable optical heart rate sensors10.1038/s41746-020-0226-62398-6352https://doaj.org/article/80ba2cc27bce46bf8b4662d44edc2cff2020-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-0226-6https://doaj.org/toc/2398-6352Abstract As wearable technologies are being increasingly used for clinical research and healthcare, it is critical to understand their accuracy and determine how measurement errors may affect research conclusions and impact healthcare decision-making. Accuracy of wearable technologies has been a hotly debated topic in both the research and popular science literature. Currently, wearable technology companies are responsible for assessing and reporting the accuracy of their products, but little information about the evaluation method is made publicly available. Heart rate measurements from wearables are derived from photoplethysmography (PPG), an optical method for measuring changes in blood volume under the skin. Potential inaccuracies in PPG stem from three major areas, includes (1) diverse skin types, (2) motion artifacts, and (3) signal crossover. To date, no study has systematically explored the accuracy of wearables across the full range of skin tones. Here, we explored heart rate and PPG data from consumer- and research-grade wearables under multiple circumstances to test whether and to what extent these inaccuracies exist. We saw no statistically significant difference in accuracy across skin tones, but we saw significant differences between devices, and between activity types, notably, that absolute error during activity was, on average, 30% higher than during rest. Our conclusions indicate that different wearables are all reasonably accurate at resting and prolonged elevated heart rate, but that differences exist between devices in responding to changes in activity. This has implications for researchers, clinicians, and consumers in drawing study conclusions, combining study results, and making health-related decisions using these devices.Brinnae BentBenjamin A. GoldsteinWarren A. KibbeJessilyn P. DunnNature PortfolioarticleComputer applications to medicine. Medical informaticsR858-859.7ENnpj Digital Medicine, Vol 3, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics
R858-859.7
spellingShingle Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics
R858-859.7
Brinnae Bent
Benjamin A. Goldstein
Warren A. Kibbe
Jessilyn P. Dunn
Investigating sources of inaccuracy in wearable optical heart rate sensors
description Abstract As wearable technologies are being increasingly used for clinical research and healthcare, it is critical to understand their accuracy and determine how measurement errors may affect research conclusions and impact healthcare decision-making. Accuracy of wearable technologies has been a hotly debated topic in both the research and popular science literature. Currently, wearable technology companies are responsible for assessing and reporting the accuracy of their products, but little information about the evaluation method is made publicly available. Heart rate measurements from wearables are derived from photoplethysmography (PPG), an optical method for measuring changes in blood volume under the skin. Potential inaccuracies in PPG stem from three major areas, includes (1) diverse skin types, (2) motion artifacts, and (3) signal crossover. To date, no study has systematically explored the accuracy of wearables across the full range of skin tones. Here, we explored heart rate and PPG data from consumer- and research-grade wearables under multiple circumstances to test whether and to what extent these inaccuracies exist. We saw no statistically significant difference in accuracy across skin tones, but we saw significant differences between devices, and between activity types, notably, that absolute error during activity was, on average, 30% higher than during rest. Our conclusions indicate that different wearables are all reasonably accurate at resting and prolonged elevated heart rate, but that differences exist between devices in responding to changes in activity. This has implications for researchers, clinicians, and consumers in drawing study conclusions, combining study results, and making health-related decisions using these devices.
format article
author Brinnae Bent
Benjamin A. Goldstein
Warren A. Kibbe
Jessilyn P. Dunn
author_facet Brinnae Bent
Benjamin A. Goldstein
Warren A. Kibbe
Jessilyn P. Dunn
author_sort Brinnae Bent
title Investigating sources of inaccuracy in wearable optical heart rate sensors
title_short Investigating sources of inaccuracy in wearable optical heart rate sensors
title_full Investigating sources of inaccuracy in wearable optical heart rate sensors
title_fullStr Investigating sources of inaccuracy in wearable optical heart rate sensors
title_full_unstemmed Investigating sources of inaccuracy in wearable optical heart rate sensors
title_sort investigating sources of inaccuracy in wearable optical heart rate sensors
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/80ba2cc27bce46bf8b4662d44edc2cff
work_keys_str_mv AT brinnaebent investigatingsourcesofinaccuracyinwearableopticalheartratesensors
AT benjaminagoldstein investigatingsourcesofinaccuracyinwearableopticalheartratesensors
AT warrenakibbe investigatingsourcesofinaccuracyinwearableopticalheartratesensors
AT jessilynpdunn investigatingsourcesofinaccuracyinwearableopticalheartratesensors
_version_ 1718396297184018432