Comparative Outcomes Analysis of Single-Port versus Multi-Port Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy in Colon Cancer

Background: In recent years, single-port laparoscopic colectomy (SPLC) has been introduced as a new technique for colorectalsurgery. Despite several studies, available results are too sparse to accurately identify differences between SPLC and conventionalmultiport laparoscopic colectomy (MPLC). In a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seyed Vahid Hosseini, Mohammed Abdzaid Akool, Mozhdeh Zamani
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2018
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/80febddd309549f5a566d9cd512a02df
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:80febddd309549f5a566d9cd512a02df
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:80febddd309549f5a566d9cd512a02df2021-11-20T07:10:22ZComparative Outcomes Analysis of Single-Port versus Multi-Port Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy in Colon Cancer2783-2430https://doaj.org/article/80febddd309549f5a566d9cd512a02df2018-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://colorectalresearch.sums.ac.ir/article_47170_1b7989d486ad5cf87bbb15bf1873e586.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2783-2430Background: In recent years, single-port laparoscopic colectomy (SPLC) has been introduced as a new technique for colorectalsurgery. Despite several studies, available results are too sparse to accurately identify differences between SPLC and conventionalmultiport laparoscopic colectomy (MPLC). In a continuing effort, the aim of this study was to compare these two techniques in coloncancer patients.Methods: 76 patients with colon cancer who underwent either SPLC or MPLC took part in this study. Demographic data and complicationssuch as age, gender, operative time, hospital stay, intra-operative blood volume loss, and internal organ injury were assessed.The patients were followed up for 6 months. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS software using Student’s t-test, Chi-squaretest, or Fisher’s exact test.Results: The complications were similar in both SPLC and MPLC groups. Operative time was significantly lower in SPLC (P = 0.003).No significant differences were observed in other factors (P > 0.05).Conclusions: According to studies conducted so far, it seems that the difference in the surgeon’s experience, types of the colorectaldiseases, and types of the colorectal resection may affect the outcomes like operative time and hospital stay. Therefore, furthercoherent investigations with larger datasets are essential for a detailed comparison.Seyed Vahid HosseiniMohammed Abdzaid AkoolMozhdeh ZamaniShiraz University of Medical Sciencesarticlecolon cancersingle-port laparoscopymultiport laparoscopyhemicolectomyMedicineRENIranian Journal of Colorectal Research, Vol 6, Iss Issues 2-3, Pp 1-6 (2018)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic colon cancer
single-port laparoscopy
multiport laparoscopy
hemicolectomy
Medicine
R
spellingShingle colon cancer
single-port laparoscopy
multiport laparoscopy
hemicolectomy
Medicine
R
Seyed Vahid Hosseini
Mohammed Abdzaid Akool
Mozhdeh Zamani
Comparative Outcomes Analysis of Single-Port versus Multi-Port Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy in Colon Cancer
description Background: In recent years, single-port laparoscopic colectomy (SPLC) has been introduced as a new technique for colorectalsurgery. Despite several studies, available results are too sparse to accurately identify differences between SPLC and conventionalmultiport laparoscopic colectomy (MPLC). In a continuing effort, the aim of this study was to compare these two techniques in coloncancer patients.Methods: 76 patients with colon cancer who underwent either SPLC or MPLC took part in this study. Demographic data and complicationssuch as age, gender, operative time, hospital stay, intra-operative blood volume loss, and internal organ injury were assessed.The patients were followed up for 6 months. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS software using Student’s t-test, Chi-squaretest, or Fisher’s exact test.Results: The complications were similar in both SPLC and MPLC groups. Operative time was significantly lower in SPLC (P = 0.003).No significant differences were observed in other factors (P > 0.05).Conclusions: According to studies conducted so far, it seems that the difference in the surgeon’s experience, types of the colorectaldiseases, and types of the colorectal resection may affect the outcomes like operative time and hospital stay. Therefore, furthercoherent investigations with larger datasets are essential for a detailed comparison.
format article
author Seyed Vahid Hosseini
Mohammed Abdzaid Akool
Mozhdeh Zamani
author_facet Seyed Vahid Hosseini
Mohammed Abdzaid Akool
Mozhdeh Zamani
author_sort Seyed Vahid Hosseini
title Comparative Outcomes Analysis of Single-Port versus Multi-Port Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy in Colon Cancer
title_short Comparative Outcomes Analysis of Single-Port versus Multi-Port Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy in Colon Cancer
title_full Comparative Outcomes Analysis of Single-Port versus Multi-Port Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy in Colon Cancer
title_fullStr Comparative Outcomes Analysis of Single-Port versus Multi-Port Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy in Colon Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Outcomes Analysis of Single-Port versus Multi-Port Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy in Colon Cancer
title_sort comparative outcomes analysis of single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy in colon cancer
publisher Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
publishDate 2018
url https://doaj.org/article/80febddd309549f5a566d9cd512a02df
work_keys_str_mv AT seyedvahidhosseini comparativeoutcomesanalysisofsingleportversusmultiportlaparoscopicrighthemicolectomyincoloncancer
AT mohammedabdzaidakool comparativeoutcomesanalysisofsingleportversusmultiportlaparoscopicrighthemicolectomyincoloncancer
AT mozhdehzamani comparativeoutcomesanalysisofsingleportversusmultiportlaparoscopicrighthemicolectomyincoloncancer
_version_ 1718419491575037952