ChemSkin Reference Chemical Database for the Development of an In Vitro Skin Irritation Test

Since the animal test ban on cosmetics in the EU in 2013, alternative in vitro safety tests have been actively researched to replace in vivo animal tests. For the development and evaluation of a new test method, reference chemicals with quality in vivo data are essential to assess the predictive cap...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Juhee Han, Ga-Young Lee, Green Bae, Mi-Jeong Kang, Kyung-Min Lim
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/80ffed2e6910469e901b732192c510be
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:80ffed2e6910469e901b732192c510be
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:80ffed2e6910469e901b732192c510be2021-11-25T19:08:21ZChemSkin Reference Chemical Database for the Development of an In Vitro Skin Irritation Test10.3390/toxics91103142305-6304https://doaj.org/article/80ffed2e6910469e901b732192c510be2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2305-6304/9/11/314https://doaj.org/toc/2305-6304Since the animal test ban on cosmetics in the EU in 2013, alternative in vitro safety tests have been actively researched to replace in vivo animal tests. For the development and evaluation of a new test method, reference chemicals with quality in vivo data are essential to assess the predictive capacity and applicability domain. Here, we compiled a reference chemical database (ChemSkin DB) for the development and evaluation of new in vitro skin irritation tests. The first candidates were selected from 317 chemicals (source data <i>n</i> = 1567) searched from the literature from the last 20 years, including previous validation study reports, ECETOC, and published papers. Chemicals showing inconsistent classification or those that were commercially unavailable, difficult or dangerous to handle, prohibitively expensive, or without quality in vivo or in vitro data were removed, leaving a total of 100 chemicals. Supporting references, in vivo Draize scores, UN GHS/EU CLP classifications and commercial sources were compiled. Test results produced by the approved methods of OECD Test No. 439 were included and compared using the classification table, scatter plot, and Pearson correlation analysis to identify the false predictions and differences between in vitro skin irritation tests. These results may provide an insight into the future development of new in vitro skin irritation tests.Juhee HanGa-Young LeeGreen BaeMi-Jeong KangKyung-Min LimMDPI AGarticleskin irritation testreference chemicalalternative test methodchemical databaseChemical technologyTP1-1185ENToxics, Vol 9, Iss 314, p 314 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic skin irritation test
reference chemical
alternative test method
chemical database
Chemical technology
TP1-1185
spellingShingle skin irritation test
reference chemical
alternative test method
chemical database
Chemical technology
TP1-1185
Juhee Han
Ga-Young Lee
Green Bae
Mi-Jeong Kang
Kyung-Min Lim
ChemSkin Reference Chemical Database for the Development of an In Vitro Skin Irritation Test
description Since the animal test ban on cosmetics in the EU in 2013, alternative in vitro safety tests have been actively researched to replace in vivo animal tests. For the development and evaluation of a new test method, reference chemicals with quality in vivo data are essential to assess the predictive capacity and applicability domain. Here, we compiled a reference chemical database (ChemSkin DB) for the development and evaluation of new in vitro skin irritation tests. The first candidates were selected from 317 chemicals (source data <i>n</i> = 1567) searched from the literature from the last 20 years, including previous validation study reports, ECETOC, and published papers. Chemicals showing inconsistent classification or those that were commercially unavailable, difficult or dangerous to handle, prohibitively expensive, or without quality in vivo or in vitro data were removed, leaving a total of 100 chemicals. Supporting references, in vivo Draize scores, UN GHS/EU CLP classifications and commercial sources were compiled. Test results produced by the approved methods of OECD Test No. 439 were included and compared using the classification table, scatter plot, and Pearson correlation analysis to identify the false predictions and differences between in vitro skin irritation tests. These results may provide an insight into the future development of new in vitro skin irritation tests.
format article
author Juhee Han
Ga-Young Lee
Green Bae
Mi-Jeong Kang
Kyung-Min Lim
author_facet Juhee Han
Ga-Young Lee
Green Bae
Mi-Jeong Kang
Kyung-Min Lim
author_sort Juhee Han
title ChemSkin Reference Chemical Database for the Development of an In Vitro Skin Irritation Test
title_short ChemSkin Reference Chemical Database for the Development of an In Vitro Skin Irritation Test
title_full ChemSkin Reference Chemical Database for the Development of an In Vitro Skin Irritation Test
title_fullStr ChemSkin Reference Chemical Database for the Development of an In Vitro Skin Irritation Test
title_full_unstemmed ChemSkin Reference Chemical Database for the Development of an In Vitro Skin Irritation Test
title_sort chemskin reference chemical database for the development of an in vitro skin irritation test
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/80ffed2e6910469e901b732192c510be
work_keys_str_mv AT juheehan chemskinreferencechemicaldatabaseforthedevelopmentofaninvitroskinirritationtest
AT gayounglee chemskinreferencechemicaldatabaseforthedevelopmentofaninvitroskinirritationtest
AT greenbae chemskinreferencechemicaldatabaseforthedevelopmentofaninvitroskinirritationtest
AT mijeongkang chemskinreferencechemicaldatabaseforthedevelopmentofaninvitroskinirritationtest
AT kyungminlim chemskinreferencechemicaldatabaseforthedevelopmentofaninvitroskinirritationtest
_version_ 1718410226444533760