The relationship between Elder Risk Assessment (ERA) scores and cardiac revascularization: a cohort study in Olmsted County, Minnesota, USA

Saurabh Sharma,1 Shruti Datta,1 Shahyar Gharacholou,1,2 Shahzad K Siddique,3 Stephen S Cha,4 Paul Y Takahashi1,5,6 1Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; 2Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; 3Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakis...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Sharma S, Datta S, Gharacholou S, Siddique SK, Cha SS, Takahashi PY
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:	coronary bypass geriatrics mortality percutaneous coronary intervention risk assessment Geriatrics RC952-954.6
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/811bbabe887145538590a0df598b84f5
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:811bbabe887145538590a0df598b84f5
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:811bbabe887145538590a0df598b84f52021-12-02T04:07:41ZThe relationship between Elder Risk Assessment (ERA) scores and cardiac revascularization: a cohort study in Olmsted County, Minnesota, USA1178-1998https://doaj.org/article/811bbabe887145538590a0df598b84f52013-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/the-relationship-between-elder-risk-assessment-era-scores-and-cardiac--peer-reviewed-article-CIAhttps://doaj.org/toc/1178-1998Saurabh Sharma,1 Shruti Datta,1 Shahyar Gharacholou,1,2 Shahzad K Siddique,3 Stephen S Cha,4 Paul Y Takahashi1,5,6 1Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; 2Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; 3Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan; 4Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; 5Division of Primary Care Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; 6Kogod Center of Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA Purpose: The aging population is predisposed to cardiovascular disease. Our goal was to determine the relationship between a higher Elder Risk Assessment (ERA) score and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), in adults over 60 years. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study in a primary care internal medicine practice. Patients included community-dwelling individuals aged 60 years or older on January 1, 2005. The primary outcome was a combined outcome of CABG and PCI in 2 years. The secondary outcome was mortality 5 years after CABG or PCI. The primary predictor variable was the score on the ERA Index, an instrument that predicts emergency room visits and hospitalization. The outcomes were obtained using administrative data from electronic medical records. The analysis included logistic regression, with odds ratios for the primary outcome and time-to-event analysis for mortality. Results: The records of 12,650 patients were studied. A total of 902 patients (7.1%) had either CABG or PCI, with an average age of 74.5 years (±8.3 years). There were 205 patients (23%) who experienced CABG or PCI in the highest-score group (top 10%) compared with 29 patients (3%) in the lowest score group, for an odds ratio of 15.4; 95% confidence interval, 10.1–23.5. There was a greater association of revascularization events by increasing score group. We noted increased mortality by increasing ERA score, in patients undergoing CABG or PCI. The patients in the highest-scoring group had a 50% 5-year survival rate compared with a 97% 5-year survival rate in the lowest-scoring group (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Older adults in the highest-ERA-scoring group had the highest utilization of CABG or PCI. Patients with high ERA scores undergoing coronary revascularization were also at the highest risk of mortality. Providers should be aware that higher ERA scores can potentially predict outcomes in high-risk patients. Keywords: coronary bypass, geriatrics, mortality, percutaneous coronary interventionSharma SDatta SGharacholou SSiddique SKCha SSTakahashi PYDove Medical Pressarticlecoronary bypassgeriatricsmortalitypercutaneous coronary interventionrisk assessmentGeriatricsRC952-954.6ENClinical Interventions in Aging, Vol Volume 8, Pp 1209-1215 (2013)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	coronary bypass geriatrics mortality percutaneous coronary intervention risk assessment Geriatrics RC952-954.6
spellingShingle	coronary bypass geriatrics mortality percutaneous coronary intervention risk assessment Geriatrics RC952-954.6 Sharma S Datta S Gharacholou S Siddique SK Cha SS Takahashi PY The relationship between Elder Risk Assessment (ERA) scores and cardiac revascularization: a cohort study in Olmsted County, Minnesota, USA
description	Saurabh Sharma,1 Shruti Datta,1 Shahyar Gharacholou,1,2 Shahzad K Siddique,3 Stephen S Cha,4 Paul Y Takahashi1,5,6 1Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; 2Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; 3Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan; 4Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; 5Division of Primary Care Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; 6Kogod Center of Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA Purpose: The aging population is predisposed to cardiovascular disease. Our goal was to determine the relationship between a higher Elder Risk Assessment (ERA) score and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), in adults over 60 years. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study in a primary care internal medicine practice. Patients included community-dwelling individuals aged 60 years or older on January 1, 2005. The primary outcome was a combined outcome of CABG and PCI in 2 years. The secondary outcome was mortality 5 years after CABG or PCI. The primary predictor variable was the score on the ERA Index, an instrument that predicts emergency room visits and hospitalization. The outcomes were obtained using administrative data from electronic medical records. The analysis included logistic regression, with odds ratios for the primary outcome and time-to-event analysis for mortality. Results: The records of 12,650 patients were studied. A total of 902 patients (7.1%) had either CABG or PCI, with an average age of 74.5 years (±8.3 years). There were 205 patients (23%) who experienced CABG or PCI in the highest-score group (top 10%) compared with 29 patients (3%) in the lowest score group, for an odds ratio of 15.4; 95% confidence interval, 10.1–23.5. There was a greater association of revascularization events by increasing score group. We noted increased mortality by increasing ERA score, in patients undergoing CABG or PCI. The patients in the highest-scoring group had a 50% 5-year survival rate compared with a 97% 5-year survival rate in the lowest-scoring group (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Older adults in the highest-ERA-scoring group had the highest utilization of CABG or PCI. Patients with high ERA scores undergoing coronary revascularization were also at the highest risk of mortality. Providers should be aware that higher ERA scores can potentially predict outcomes in high-risk patients. Keywords: coronary bypass, geriatrics, mortality, percutaneous coronary intervention
format	article
author	Sharma S Datta S Gharacholou S Siddique SK Cha SS Takahashi PY
author_facet	Sharma S Datta S Gharacholou S Siddique SK Cha SS Takahashi PY
author_sort	Sharma S
title	The relationship between Elder Risk Assessment (ERA) scores and cardiac revascularization: a cohort study in Olmsted County, Minnesota, USA
title_short	The relationship between Elder Risk Assessment (ERA) scores and cardiac revascularization: a cohort study in Olmsted County, Minnesota, USA
title_full	The relationship between Elder Risk Assessment (ERA) scores and cardiac revascularization: a cohort study in Olmsted County, Minnesota, USA
title_fullStr	The relationship between Elder Risk Assessment (ERA) scores and cardiac revascularization: a cohort study in Olmsted County, Minnesota, USA
title_full_unstemmed	The relationship between Elder Risk Assessment (ERA) scores and cardiac revascularization: a cohort study in Olmsted County, Minnesota, USA
title_sort	relationship between elder risk assessment (era) scores and cardiac revascularization: a cohort study in olmsted county, minnesota, usa
publisher	Dove Medical Press
publishDate	2013
url	https://doaj.org/article/811bbabe887145538590a0df598b84f5
work_keys_str_mv	AT sharmas therelationshipbetweenelderriskassessmenterascoresandcardiacrevascularizationacohortstudyinolmstedcountyminnesotausa AT dattas therelationshipbetweenelderriskassessmenterascoresandcardiacrevascularizationacohortstudyinolmstedcountyminnesotausa AT gharacholous therelationshipbetweenelderriskassessmenterascoresandcardiacrevascularizationacohortstudyinolmstedcountyminnesotausa AT siddiquesk therelationshipbetweenelderriskassessmenterascoresandcardiacrevascularizationacohortstudyinolmstedcountyminnesotausa AT chass therelationshipbetweenelderriskassessmenterascoresandcardiacrevascularizationacohortstudyinolmstedcountyminnesotausa AT takahashipy therelationshipbetweenelderriskassessmenterascoresandcardiacrevascularizationacohortstudyinolmstedcountyminnesotausa AT sharmas relationshipbetweenelderriskassessmenterascoresandcardiacrevascularizationacohortstudyinolmstedcountyminnesotausa AT dattas relationshipbetweenelderriskassessmenterascoresandcardiacrevascularizationacohortstudyinolmstedcountyminnesotausa AT gharacholous relationshipbetweenelderriskassessmenterascoresandcardiacrevascularizationacohortstudyinolmstedcountyminnesotausa AT siddiquesk relationshipbetweenelderriskassessmenterascoresandcardiacrevascularizationacohortstudyinolmstedcountyminnesotausa AT chass relationshipbetweenelderriskassessmenterascoresandcardiacrevascularizationacohortstudyinolmstedcountyminnesotausa AT takahashipy relationshipbetweenelderriskassessmenterascoresandcardiacrevascularizationacohortstudyinolmstedcountyminnesotausa
_version_	1718401441743241216

The relationship between Elder Risk Assessment (ERA) scores and cardiac revascularization: a cohort study in Olmsted County, Minnesota, USA

Ejemplares similares