The short- and long-term temporal relation between falls and concern about falling in older adults without a recent history of falling.

<h4>Background and aim</h4>The reciprocal relation between falling and concern about falling is complex and not well understood. We aimed to determine whether concern about falling increases after a fall and whether concern about falling increases the odds of future falls in community-dw...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roel H A Weijer, Marco J M Hoozemans, Onno G Meijer, Jaap H van Dieën, Mirjam Pijnappels
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/815f290bf1684d21aa5f24f9067846ef
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:815f290bf1684d21aa5f24f9067846ef
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:815f290bf1684d21aa5f24f9067846ef2021-12-02T20:05:09ZThe short- and long-term temporal relation between falls and concern about falling in older adults without a recent history of falling.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0253374https://doaj.org/article/815f290bf1684d21aa5f24f9067846ef2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253374https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background and aim</h4>The reciprocal relation between falling and concern about falling is complex and not well understood. We aimed to determine whether concern about falling increases after a fall and whether concern about falling increases the odds of future falls in community-dwelling older adults without a recent fall history.<h4>Methods</h4>We selected 118 community-dwelling older adults (mean age: 71.4 (SD: 5.3) years) without a self-reported history of falling, one year prior to baseline assessment, from the one-year VIBE cohort for analyses. On a monthly basis, we recorded concern about falling (using the Falls Efficacy Scale-International, FES-I), as well as the occurrence of falls (through questionnaires and telephone calls). We determined 1) whether falling predicts an increase in concern about falling and 2) whether a high concern about falling is predictive of falling. Standard linear (fixed-effects) regression and mixed effects regression analyses were performed over long-term, i.e. one year, and short-term, i.e. one-month, intervals, respectively and were adjusted for gender, age and physical activity (quantified as the average total walking duration per day). Analyses were performed separately for all reported falls and for injurious falls only.<h4>Results</h4>High concern about falling at baseline did not predict falls over the course of one year, nor over the course of one month. Furthermore, falls in between baseline assessment and one year thereafter did not predict increased concern about falling from baseline to one year later, independent of whether all falls or only injurious falls were considered. However, falls, either all or injurious only, happening somewhere over the course of a one-month interval, significantly predicted small increases in concern about falling (1.49 FES-I points, 95% CI [0.74, 2.25], p<0.001 for all falls; 2.60 FES-I points, 95% CI [1.55, 3.64], p<0.001 for injurious falls) from the start to the end of that one-month interval.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Older adults without a recent history of falling seem to be resilient against developing concern about falling after having fallen, resulting in a short-term temporary effect of falling on concern about falling. Furthermore, we found no evidence that a high concern about falling predicts future falls over a one-month or a one-year follow-up period, suggesting that concern is not a primary cause for falls in older adults without a recent history of falling.Roel H A WeijerMarco J M HoozemansOnno G MeijerJaap H van DieënMirjam PijnappelsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 7, p e0253374 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Roel H A Weijer
Marco J M Hoozemans
Onno G Meijer
Jaap H van Dieën
Mirjam Pijnappels
The short- and long-term temporal relation between falls and concern about falling in older adults without a recent history of falling.
description <h4>Background and aim</h4>The reciprocal relation between falling and concern about falling is complex and not well understood. We aimed to determine whether concern about falling increases after a fall and whether concern about falling increases the odds of future falls in community-dwelling older adults without a recent fall history.<h4>Methods</h4>We selected 118 community-dwelling older adults (mean age: 71.4 (SD: 5.3) years) without a self-reported history of falling, one year prior to baseline assessment, from the one-year VIBE cohort for analyses. On a monthly basis, we recorded concern about falling (using the Falls Efficacy Scale-International, FES-I), as well as the occurrence of falls (through questionnaires and telephone calls). We determined 1) whether falling predicts an increase in concern about falling and 2) whether a high concern about falling is predictive of falling. Standard linear (fixed-effects) regression and mixed effects regression analyses were performed over long-term, i.e. one year, and short-term, i.e. one-month, intervals, respectively and were adjusted for gender, age and physical activity (quantified as the average total walking duration per day). Analyses were performed separately for all reported falls and for injurious falls only.<h4>Results</h4>High concern about falling at baseline did not predict falls over the course of one year, nor over the course of one month. Furthermore, falls in between baseline assessment and one year thereafter did not predict increased concern about falling from baseline to one year later, independent of whether all falls or only injurious falls were considered. However, falls, either all or injurious only, happening somewhere over the course of a one-month interval, significantly predicted small increases in concern about falling (1.49 FES-I points, 95% CI [0.74, 2.25], p<0.001 for all falls; 2.60 FES-I points, 95% CI [1.55, 3.64], p<0.001 for injurious falls) from the start to the end of that one-month interval.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Older adults without a recent history of falling seem to be resilient against developing concern about falling after having fallen, resulting in a short-term temporary effect of falling on concern about falling. Furthermore, we found no evidence that a high concern about falling predicts future falls over a one-month or a one-year follow-up period, suggesting that concern is not a primary cause for falls in older adults without a recent history of falling.
format article
author Roel H A Weijer
Marco J M Hoozemans
Onno G Meijer
Jaap H van Dieën
Mirjam Pijnappels
author_facet Roel H A Weijer
Marco J M Hoozemans
Onno G Meijer
Jaap H van Dieën
Mirjam Pijnappels
author_sort Roel H A Weijer
title The short- and long-term temporal relation between falls and concern about falling in older adults without a recent history of falling.
title_short The short- and long-term temporal relation between falls and concern about falling in older adults without a recent history of falling.
title_full The short- and long-term temporal relation between falls and concern about falling in older adults without a recent history of falling.
title_fullStr The short- and long-term temporal relation between falls and concern about falling in older adults without a recent history of falling.
title_full_unstemmed The short- and long-term temporal relation between falls and concern about falling in older adults without a recent history of falling.
title_sort short- and long-term temporal relation between falls and concern about falling in older adults without a recent history of falling.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/815f290bf1684d21aa5f24f9067846ef
work_keys_str_mv AT roelhaweijer theshortandlongtermtemporalrelationbetweenfallsandconcernaboutfallinginolderadultswithoutarecenthistoryoffalling
AT marcojmhoozemans theshortandlongtermtemporalrelationbetweenfallsandconcernaboutfallinginolderadultswithoutarecenthistoryoffalling
AT onnogmeijer theshortandlongtermtemporalrelationbetweenfallsandconcernaboutfallinginolderadultswithoutarecenthistoryoffalling
AT jaaphvandieen theshortandlongtermtemporalrelationbetweenfallsandconcernaboutfallinginolderadultswithoutarecenthistoryoffalling
AT mirjampijnappels theshortandlongtermtemporalrelationbetweenfallsandconcernaboutfallinginolderadultswithoutarecenthistoryoffalling
AT roelhaweijer shortandlongtermtemporalrelationbetweenfallsandconcernaboutfallinginolderadultswithoutarecenthistoryoffalling
AT marcojmhoozemans shortandlongtermtemporalrelationbetweenfallsandconcernaboutfallinginolderadultswithoutarecenthistoryoffalling
AT onnogmeijer shortandlongtermtemporalrelationbetweenfallsandconcernaboutfallinginolderadultswithoutarecenthistoryoffalling
AT jaaphvandieen shortandlongtermtemporalrelationbetweenfallsandconcernaboutfallinginolderadultswithoutarecenthistoryoffalling
AT mirjampijnappels shortandlongtermtemporalrelationbetweenfallsandconcernaboutfallinginolderadultswithoutarecenthistoryoffalling
_version_ 1718375491902111744