Art, Aura, and Admiration in the Age of Digital Reproduction

Walter Benjamin famously argued that the mass public of the twentieth century would necessarily correlate with a newly politicized art. But the world has changed considerably since Benjamin’s article was written, as Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer already were assessing less than a decade later. I...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Emison Patricia Anne
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Sciendo 2021
Materias:
N
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/817dd7e94f4843779a173e79c1b647e9
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:817dd7e94f4843779a173e79c1b647e9
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:817dd7e94f4843779a173e79c1b647e92021-12-05T14:11:08ZArt, Aura, and Admiration in the Age of Digital Reproduction1822-454710.2478/mik-2021-0001https://doaj.org/article/817dd7e94f4843779a173e79c1b647e92021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.2478/mik-2021-0001https://doaj.org/toc/1822-4547Walter Benjamin famously argued that the mass public of the twentieth century would necessarily correlate with a newly politicized art. But the world has changed considerably since Benjamin’s article was written, as Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer already were assessing less than a decade later. It is the purpose of this article to examine how the aesthetics of the Frankfurt school, though frequently still invoked, have lost some of their immediate relevance. The anti-establishment phase of the 60s, compounded by a pronounced taste for irony, rendered aura and exhibition outmoded values, while on the other hand, more recently, price escalation in the art market and digitization have made certain of the Frankfurt school arguments more pertinent than ever. Taking as examples Goldsworthy and Kentridge, this essay argues that a deliberate loosening of the artist’s control over both medium and reception displaces the warmed-over religious responses endorsed by Benjamin, positing instead increased intellectual agency on the part of viewers, whose identity as a mass public has become newly complicated.Emison Patricia AnneSciendoarticlebenjaminhorkheimeradornoauthenticityauraadvertisingmass publicmuseumsfilmchaplinpicassogoldsworthykentridgetechnologyirreverenceFine ArtsNENMeno Istorija ir Kritika, Vol 17, Iss 1, Pp 5-16 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic benjamin
horkheimer
adorno
authenticity
aura
advertising
mass public
museums
film
chaplin
picasso
goldsworthy
kentridge
technology
irreverence
Fine Arts
N
spellingShingle benjamin
horkheimer
adorno
authenticity
aura
advertising
mass public
museums
film
chaplin
picasso
goldsworthy
kentridge
technology
irreverence
Fine Arts
N
Emison Patricia Anne
Art, Aura, and Admiration in the Age of Digital Reproduction
description Walter Benjamin famously argued that the mass public of the twentieth century would necessarily correlate with a newly politicized art. But the world has changed considerably since Benjamin’s article was written, as Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer already were assessing less than a decade later. It is the purpose of this article to examine how the aesthetics of the Frankfurt school, though frequently still invoked, have lost some of their immediate relevance. The anti-establishment phase of the 60s, compounded by a pronounced taste for irony, rendered aura and exhibition outmoded values, while on the other hand, more recently, price escalation in the art market and digitization have made certain of the Frankfurt school arguments more pertinent than ever. Taking as examples Goldsworthy and Kentridge, this essay argues that a deliberate loosening of the artist’s control over both medium and reception displaces the warmed-over religious responses endorsed by Benjamin, positing instead increased intellectual agency on the part of viewers, whose identity as a mass public has become newly complicated.
format article
author Emison Patricia Anne
author_facet Emison Patricia Anne
author_sort Emison Patricia Anne
title Art, Aura, and Admiration in the Age of Digital Reproduction
title_short Art, Aura, and Admiration in the Age of Digital Reproduction
title_full Art, Aura, and Admiration in the Age of Digital Reproduction
title_fullStr Art, Aura, and Admiration in the Age of Digital Reproduction
title_full_unstemmed Art, Aura, and Admiration in the Age of Digital Reproduction
title_sort art, aura, and admiration in the age of digital reproduction
publisher Sciendo
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/817dd7e94f4843779a173e79c1b647e9
work_keys_str_mv AT emisonpatriciaanne artauraandadmirationintheageofdigitalreproduction
_version_ 1718371367155400704