Peer review, program officers and science funding.
Increased competition for research funding has led to growth in proposal submissions and lower funding-success rates. An agent-based model of the funding cycle, accounting for variations in program officer and reviewer behaviors, for a range of funding rates, is used to assess the efficiency of diff...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Paul J Roebber, David M Schultz |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/81822547237b49a7a1f8e4599c4f716e |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
The validation of peer review through research impact measures and the implications for funding strategies.
por: Stephen A Gallo, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Funding of medical science in Russia within as part of state programs
por: V. I. Starodubov, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Perspectives on automated composition of workflows in the life sciences [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
por: Anna-Lena Lamprecht, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Review of the Russian Fund for Humanities and Social Sciences
por: V. I. Konnov
Publicado: (2012) -
Peer Review Regulation in the German Science and Research Association
por: E. Vodyanitskaya
Publicado: (2012)