The importance of selection bias in prospective birth cohort studies
Abstract Sophisticated statistical analyses of data from large‐scale prospective birth cohort studies combined with thoughtful study designs have advanced understanding about the causes, consequences and developmental course of child and adolescent mental health problems. Available large‐scale prosp...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Wiley
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/81aff0c7be2d40e5bf2d1551907f6bcb |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:81aff0c7be2d40e5bf2d1551907f6bcb |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:81aff0c7be2d40e5bf2d1551907f6bcb2021-11-23T06:05:44ZThe importance of selection bias in prospective birth cohort studies2692-938410.1002/jcv2.12043https://doaj.org/article/81aff0c7be2d40e5bf2d1551907f6bcb2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.12043https://doaj.org/toc/2692-9384Abstract Sophisticated statistical analyses of data from large‐scale prospective birth cohort studies combined with thoughtful study designs have advanced understanding about the causes, consequences and developmental course of child and adolescent mental health problems. Available large‐scale prospective cohort studies, such as ALSPAC, MoBA, and TEDS have many noteworthy strengths, but they all suffer from non‐random non‐participation and attrition over time. Recent findings have highlighted that prospective birth cohort studies need to carefully consider the importance of selection bias.Henrik LarssonWileyarticleALSPACnon‐participationprospective birth cohort studiesselection biasPediatricsRJ1-570PsychiatryRC435-571ENJCPP Advances, Vol 1, Iss 3, Pp n/a-n/a (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
ALSPAC non‐participation prospective birth cohort studies selection bias Pediatrics RJ1-570 Psychiatry RC435-571 |
spellingShingle |
ALSPAC non‐participation prospective birth cohort studies selection bias Pediatrics RJ1-570 Psychiatry RC435-571 Henrik Larsson The importance of selection bias in prospective birth cohort studies |
description |
Abstract Sophisticated statistical analyses of data from large‐scale prospective birth cohort studies combined with thoughtful study designs have advanced understanding about the causes, consequences and developmental course of child and adolescent mental health problems. Available large‐scale prospective cohort studies, such as ALSPAC, MoBA, and TEDS have many noteworthy strengths, but they all suffer from non‐random non‐participation and attrition over time. Recent findings have highlighted that prospective birth cohort studies need to carefully consider the importance of selection bias. |
format |
article |
author |
Henrik Larsson |
author_facet |
Henrik Larsson |
author_sort |
Henrik Larsson |
title |
The importance of selection bias in prospective birth cohort studies |
title_short |
The importance of selection bias in prospective birth cohort studies |
title_full |
The importance of selection bias in prospective birth cohort studies |
title_fullStr |
The importance of selection bias in prospective birth cohort studies |
title_full_unstemmed |
The importance of selection bias in prospective birth cohort studies |
title_sort |
importance of selection bias in prospective birth cohort studies |
publisher |
Wiley |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/81aff0c7be2d40e5bf2d1551907f6bcb |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT henriklarsson theimportanceofselectionbiasinprospectivebirthcohortstudies AT henriklarsson importanceofselectionbiasinprospectivebirthcohortstudies |
_version_ |
1718417329529815040 |