BLINCK—A diagnostic algorithm for skin cancer diagnosis combining clinical features with dermatoscopy findings

Background: Deciding whether a skin lesion requires biopsy to exclude skin cancer is often challenging for primary care clinicians in Australia. There are several published algorithms designed to assist with the diagnosis of skin cancer but apart from the clinical ABCD rule, these algorithms only e...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peter Bourne, Cliff Rosendahl, Jeff Keir, Alan Cameron
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Mattioli1885 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/81efa0e703f541ef900dc26b1fd16c37
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:81efa0e703f541ef900dc26b1fd16c37
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:81efa0e703f541ef900dc26b1fd16c372021-11-17T08:33:09ZBLINCK—A diagnostic algorithm for skin cancer diagnosis combining clinical features with dermatoscopy findings10.5826/dpc.0202a122160-9381https://doaj.org/article/81efa0e703f541ef900dc26b1fd16c372012-04-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dpcj.org/index.php/dpc/article/view/1173https://doaj.org/toc/2160-9381 Background: Deciding whether a skin lesion requires biopsy to exclude skin cancer is often challenging for primary care clinicians in Australia. There are several published algorithms designed to assist with the diagnosis of skin cancer but apart from the clinical ABCD rule, these algorithms only evaluate the dermatoscopic features of a lesion. Objectives: The BLINCK algorithm explores the effect of combining clinical history and examination with fundamental dermatoscopic assessment in primary care skin cancer practice. Patients/Methods: Clinical and dermatoscopic images of 50 skin lesions were collected and shown to four primary care practitioners. The cases were assessed by each participant and lesions requiring biopsy were determined on separate occasions using the 3-Point Checklist, the Menzies method, clinical assessment alone and the BLINCK algorithm. Results: The BLINCK algorithm had the highest sensitivity and found more melanomas than any of the other methods. However, BLINCK required more biopsies than the other methods. When comparing diagnostic accuracy, there was no difference between BLINCK, Menzies method and clinical assessment but all were better than the 3-Point checklist. Conclusions: These results suggest that the BLINK algorithm may be a useful skin cancer screening tool for Australian primary care practice. Peter BourneCliff RosendahlJeff KeirAlan CameronMattioli1885articlemelanomaskin cancerdiagnostic algorithmBLINCKprimary careDermatologyRL1-803ENDermatology Practical & Conceptual (2012)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic melanoma
skin cancer
diagnostic algorithm
BLINCK
primary care
Dermatology
RL1-803
spellingShingle melanoma
skin cancer
diagnostic algorithm
BLINCK
primary care
Dermatology
RL1-803
Peter Bourne
Cliff Rosendahl
Jeff Keir
Alan Cameron
BLINCK—A diagnostic algorithm for skin cancer diagnosis combining clinical features with dermatoscopy findings
description Background: Deciding whether a skin lesion requires biopsy to exclude skin cancer is often challenging for primary care clinicians in Australia. There are several published algorithms designed to assist with the diagnosis of skin cancer but apart from the clinical ABCD rule, these algorithms only evaluate the dermatoscopic features of a lesion. Objectives: The BLINCK algorithm explores the effect of combining clinical history and examination with fundamental dermatoscopic assessment in primary care skin cancer practice. Patients/Methods: Clinical and dermatoscopic images of 50 skin lesions were collected and shown to four primary care practitioners. The cases were assessed by each participant and lesions requiring biopsy were determined on separate occasions using the 3-Point Checklist, the Menzies method, clinical assessment alone and the BLINCK algorithm. Results: The BLINCK algorithm had the highest sensitivity and found more melanomas than any of the other methods. However, BLINCK required more biopsies than the other methods. When comparing diagnostic accuracy, there was no difference between BLINCK, Menzies method and clinical assessment but all were better than the 3-Point checklist. Conclusions: These results suggest that the BLINK algorithm may be a useful skin cancer screening tool for Australian primary care practice.
format article
author Peter Bourne
Cliff Rosendahl
Jeff Keir
Alan Cameron
author_facet Peter Bourne
Cliff Rosendahl
Jeff Keir
Alan Cameron
author_sort Peter Bourne
title BLINCK—A diagnostic algorithm for skin cancer diagnosis combining clinical features with dermatoscopy findings
title_short BLINCK—A diagnostic algorithm for skin cancer diagnosis combining clinical features with dermatoscopy findings
title_full BLINCK—A diagnostic algorithm for skin cancer diagnosis combining clinical features with dermatoscopy findings
title_fullStr BLINCK—A diagnostic algorithm for skin cancer diagnosis combining clinical features with dermatoscopy findings
title_full_unstemmed BLINCK—A diagnostic algorithm for skin cancer diagnosis combining clinical features with dermatoscopy findings
title_sort blinck—a diagnostic algorithm for skin cancer diagnosis combining clinical features with dermatoscopy findings
publisher Mattioli1885
publishDate 2012
url https://doaj.org/article/81efa0e703f541ef900dc26b1fd16c37
work_keys_str_mv AT peterbourne blinckadiagnosticalgorithmforskincancerdiagnosiscombiningclinicalfeatureswithdermatoscopyfindings
AT cliffrosendahl blinckadiagnosticalgorithmforskincancerdiagnosiscombiningclinicalfeatureswithdermatoscopyfindings
AT jeffkeir blinckadiagnosticalgorithmforskincancerdiagnosiscombiningclinicalfeatureswithdermatoscopyfindings
AT alancameron blinckadiagnosticalgorithmforskincancerdiagnosiscombiningclinicalfeatureswithdermatoscopyfindings
_version_ 1718425681357963264