The economic consequences of homo economicus: neoclassical economic theory and the fallacy of market optimality
This essay presents a critique of the standard ascension from the rational agent to the optimal market in economic theory. Critiques of homo economicus are found unsatisfactory on grounds that its employment allows for the prediction of essential features of actual markets. using this same criterion...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | David Calnitsky, Asher Dupuy-Spencer |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | DE EN FR |
Publicado: |
Editura ASE Bucuresti
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/820053f58e4f480582abf4bf7fabb590 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Ecce Homo-Economicus? The Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hide syndrome of the economic man in the context of natural resources scarcity and environmental externalities
por: Panos KALIMERIS
Publicado: (2018) -
Behavioural controversy concerning homo economicus: a Humean perspective
por: Khandakar Elahi
Publicado: (2014) -
Investment decision and methodology: Keynes and neoclassical
por: Marco Crocco
Publicado: (1998) -
The resilience of modern neoclassical economics – a case study in the light of Ludwik Fleck’s ‘harmony of deception’
por: Arne Heise
Publicado: (2019) -
THE EVOLUTION OF HOMO ECONOMICUS
por: N. V. Komarovskaia
Publicado: (2016)