Lectotypification of Chamaecyparis hodginsii of the Cupressaceae

Recent phylogenetic studies have suggested that the monotypic Fokienia A.Henry &amp; H.H.Thomas is nested within Chamaecyparis Spach, which is in agreement with separate morphological studies. Here the authors confirm a previous taxonomic treatment that incorporated Fokienia hodginsii (Dunn)...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Zhi Yang, Yong Yang, Keith Rushforth
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Pensoft Publishers 2021
Materias:	Botany QK1-989
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/82008124af3442039be1f71fc2e3143d
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:82008124af3442039be1f71fc2e3143d
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:82008124af3442039be1f71fc2e3143d2021-11-20T04:30:26ZLectotypification of Chamaecyparis hodginsii of the Cupressaceae10.3897/phytokeys.185.757961314-2003https://doaj.org/article/82008124af3442039be1f71fc2e3143d2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://phytokeys.pensoft.net/article/75796/download/pdf/https://phytokeys.pensoft.net/article/75796/download/xml/https://phytokeys.pensoft.net/article/75796/https://doaj.org/toc/1314-2003Recent phylogenetic studies have suggested that the monotypic Fokienia A.Henry &amp; H.H.Thomas is nested within Chamaecyparis Spach, which is in agreement with separate morphological studies. Here the authors confirm a previous taxonomic treatment that incorporated Fokienia hodginsii (Dunn) A.Henry &amp; H.H.Thomas into Chamaecyparis based on the monophyly requirement of taxonomy, i.e. Chamaecyparis hodginsii (Dunn) Rushforth. In addition, the type collection of the basionym Cupressus hodginsii Dunn was found to contain three sheets of specimens, one in K including a vegetative branch (K000088294) and a separate ovulate cone (K001090486), a second one in A (A00022477), and a third one in IBSC (IBSC0016081). All three specimens are marked with Hongkong Herbarium No. 3505, but only the two specimens in K and IBSC possess similar handwriting of “Cupressus hodginsii Dunn”. The two specimens should be considered as syntypes according to the Shenzhen Code. The specimen in K is better preserved but it is a mixture according to the collection label: cones from Foochow (Fuzhou) and foliage from Yenping (Nanping). We lectotypified the name Cupressus hodginsii with K000088294 because the specimen is well preserved and has enough characters for identification. Moreover, an ovulate cone (K001090486) is on the same sheet.Zhi YangYong YangKeith RushforthPensoft PublishersarticleBotanyQK1-989ENPhytoKeys, Vol 185, Iss , Pp 117-122 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Botany QK1-989
spellingShingle	Botany QK1-989 Zhi Yang Yong Yang Keith Rushforth Lectotypification of Chamaecyparis hodginsii of the Cupressaceae
description	Recent phylogenetic studies have suggested that the monotypic Fokienia A.Henry &amp; H.H.Thomas is nested within Chamaecyparis Spach, which is in agreement with separate morphological studies. Here the authors confirm a previous taxonomic treatment that incorporated Fokienia hodginsii (Dunn) A.Henry &amp; H.H.Thomas into Chamaecyparis based on the monophyly requirement of taxonomy, i.e. Chamaecyparis hodginsii (Dunn) Rushforth. In addition, the type collection of the basionym Cupressus hodginsii Dunn was found to contain three sheets of specimens, one in K including a vegetative branch (K000088294) and a separate ovulate cone (K001090486), a second one in A (A00022477), and a third one in IBSC (IBSC0016081). All three specimens are marked with Hongkong Herbarium No. 3505, but only the two specimens in K and IBSC possess similar handwriting of “Cupressus hodginsii Dunn”. The two specimens should be considered as syntypes according to the Shenzhen Code. The specimen in K is better preserved but it is a mixture according to the collection label: cones from Foochow (Fuzhou) and foliage from Yenping (Nanping). We lectotypified the name Cupressus hodginsii with K000088294 because the specimen is well preserved and has enough characters for identification. Moreover, an ovulate cone (K001090486) is on the same sheet.
format	article
author	Zhi Yang Yong Yang Keith Rushforth
author_facet	Zhi Yang Yong Yang Keith Rushforth
author_sort	Zhi Yang
title	Lectotypification of Chamaecyparis hodginsii of the Cupressaceae
title_short	Lectotypification of Chamaecyparis hodginsii of the Cupressaceae
title_full	Lectotypification of Chamaecyparis hodginsii of the Cupressaceae
title_fullStr	Lectotypification of Chamaecyparis hodginsii of the Cupressaceae
title_full_unstemmed	Lectotypification of Chamaecyparis hodginsii of the Cupressaceae
title_sort	lectotypification of chamaecyparis hodginsii of the cupressaceae
publisher	Pensoft Publishers
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/82008124af3442039be1f71fc2e3143d
work_keys_str_mv	AT zhiyang lectotypificationofchamaecyparishodginsiiofthecupressaceae AT yongyang lectotypificationofchamaecyparishodginsiiofthecupressaceae AT keithrushforth lectotypificationofchamaecyparishodginsiiofthecupressaceae
_version_	1718419783860355072

Lectotypification of Chamaecyparis hodginsii of the Cupressaceae

Ejemplares similares