Robotic Stroking on the Face and Forearm: Touch Satiety and Effects on Mechanical Pain

Background: Slow stroking touch is generally perceived as pleasant and reduces thermal pain. However, the tactile stimuli applied tend to be short-lasting and typically applied to the forearm. This study aimed to compare the effects of a long-lasting brushing stimulus applied to the facial region an...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pankaj Taneja, Lene Baad-Hansen, Sumaiya Shaikh, Peter Svensson, Håkan Olausson
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/82613f26e69b4b048c8b43707563a739
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:82613f26e69b4b048c8b43707563a739
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:82613f26e69b4b048c8b43707563a7392021-11-22T04:39:04ZRobotic Stroking on the Face and Forearm: Touch Satiety and Effects on Mechanical Pain2673-561X10.3389/fpain.2021.693987https://doaj.org/article/82613f26e69b4b048c8b43707563a7392021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpain.2021.693987/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2673-561XBackground: Slow stroking touch is generally perceived as pleasant and reduces thermal pain. However, the tactile stimuli applied tend to be short-lasting and typically applied to the forearm. This study aimed to compare the effects of a long-lasting brushing stimulus applied to the facial region and the forearm on pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) taken on the hand. Outcome measurements were touch satiety and concurrent mechanical pain thresholds of the hand.Methods: A total of 24 participants were recruited and randomized to receive continuous stroking, utilizing a robotic stimulator, at C-tactile (CT) favorable (3 cm/s) and non-favorable (30 cm/s) velocities applied to the right face or forearm. Ratings of touch pleasantness and unpleasantness and PPTs from the hypothenar muscle of the right hand were collected at the start of stroking and once per minute for 5 min.Results: A reduction in PPTs (increased pain sensitivity) was observed over time (P < 0.001). However, the increase in pain sensitivity was less prominent when the face was stroked compared to the forearm (P = 0.001). Continuous stroking resulted in a significant interaction between region and time (P = 0.008) on pleasantness ratings, with a decline in ratings observed over time for the forearm, but not on the face. Unpleasantness ratings were generally low.Conclusion: We observed touch satiety for 5 min of continuous robotic brushing on the forearm confirming previous studies. However, we did not observe any touch satiety for brushing the face. Mechanical pain sensitivity, measured in the hand, increased over the 5-min period but less so when paired with brushing on the face than with brushing on the forearm. The differential effects of brushing on the face and forearm on touch satiety and pain modulation may be by the differences in the emotional relevance and neuronal pathways involved.Pankaj TanejaPankaj TanejaLene Baad-HansenLene Baad-HansenSumaiya ShaikhPeter SvenssonPeter SvenssonPeter SvenssonHåkan OlaussonFrontiers Media S.A.articleorofacial painsatietypleasantnessunpleasantnessC-tactile afferentNeurology. Diseases of the nervous systemRC346-429ENFrontiers in Pain Research, Vol 2 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic orofacial pain
satiety
pleasantness
unpleasantness
C-tactile afferent
Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
RC346-429
spellingShingle orofacial pain
satiety
pleasantness
unpleasantness
C-tactile afferent
Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
RC346-429
Pankaj Taneja
Pankaj Taneja
Lene Baad-Hansen
Lene Baad-Hansen
Sumaiya Shaikh
Peter Svensson
Peter Svensson
Peter Svensson
Håkan Olausson
Robotic Stroking on the Face and Forearm: Touch Satiety and Effects on Mechanical Pain
description Background: Slow stroking touch is generally perceived as pleasant and reduces thermal pain. However, the tactile stimuli applied tend to be short-lasting and typically applied to the forearm. This study aimed to compare the effects of a long-lasting brushing stimulus applied to the facial region and the forearm on pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) taken on the hand. Outcome measurements were touch satiety and concurrent mechanical pain thresholds of the hand.Methods: A total of 24 participants were recruited and randomized to receive continuous stroking, utilizing a robotic stimulator, at C-tactile (CT) favorable (3 cm/s) and non-favorable (30 cm/s) velocities applied to the right face or forearm. Ratings of touch pleasantness and unpleasantness and PPTs from the hypothenar muscle of the right hand were collected at the start of stroking and once per minute for 5 min.Results: A reduction in PPTs (increased pain sensitivity) was observed over time (P < 0.001). However, the increase in pain sensitivity was less prominent when the face was stroked compared to the forearm (P = 0.001). Continuous stroking resulted in a significant interaction between region and time (P = 0.008) on pleasantness ratings, with a decline in ratings observed over time for the forearm, but not on the face. Unpleasantness ratings were generally low.Conclusion: We observed touch satiety for 5 min of continuous robotic brushing on the forearm confirming previous studies. However, we did not observe any touch satiety for brushing the face. Mechanical pain sensitivity, measured in the hand, increased over the 5-min period but less so when paired with brushing on the face than with brushing on the forearm. The differential effects of brushing on the face and forearm on touch satiety and pain modulation may be by the differences in the emotional relevance and neuronal pathways involved.
format article
author Pankaj Taneja
Pankaj Taneja
Lene Baad-Hansen
Lene Baad-Hansen
Sumaiya Shaikh
Peter Svensson
Peter Svensson
Peter Svensson
Håkan Olausson
author_facet Pankaj Taneja
Pankaj Taneja
Lene Baad-Hansen
Lene Baad-Hansen
Sumaiya Shaikh
Peter Svensson
Peter Svensson
Peter Svensson
Håkan Olausson
author_sort Pankaj Taneja
title Robotic Stroking on the Face and Forearm: Touch Satiety and Effects on Mechanical Pain
title_short Robotic Stroking on the Face and Forearm: Touch Satiety and Effects on Mechanical Pain
title_full Robotic Stroking on the Face and Forearm: Touch Satiety and Effects on Mechanical Pain
title_fullStr Robotic Stroking on the Face and Forearm: Touch Satiety and Effects on Mechanical Pain
title_full_unstemmed Robotic Stroking on the Face and Forearm: Touch Satiety and Effects on Mechanical Pain
title_sort robotic stroking on the face and forearm: touch satiety and effects on mechanical pain
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/82613f26e69b4b048c8b43707563a739
work_keys_str_mv AT pankajtaneja roboticstrokingonthefaceandforearmtouchsatietyandeffectsonmechanicalpain
AT pankajtaneja roboticstrokingonthefaceandforearmtouchsatietyandeffectsonmechanicalpain
AT lenebaadhansen roboticstrokingonthefaceandforearmtouchsatietyandeffectsonmechanicalpain
AT lenebaadhansen roboticstrokingonthefaceandforearmtouchsatietyandeffectsonmechanicalpain
AT sumaiyashaikh roboticstrokingonthefaceandforearmtouchsatietyandeffectsonmechanicalpain
AT petersvensson roboticstrokingonthefaceandforearmtouchsatietyandeffectsonmechanicalpain
AT petersvensson roboticstrokingonthefaceandforearmtouchsatietyandeffectsonmechanicalpain
AT petersvensson roboticstrokingonthefaceandforearmtouchsatietyandeffectsonmechanicalpain
AT hakanolausson roboticstrokingonthefaceandforearmtouchsatietyandeffectsonmechanicalpain
_version_ 1718418171364376576