Monitoring the environmental sustainability of countries through the strong environmental sustainability index

Countries still lack adequate metrics to monitor environmental sustainability across a range of relevant environmental and resource issues. The Strong Environmental Sustainability Index (SESI), which is based on the Environmental Sustainability Gap (ESGAP) framework, is intended to fill this gap. SE...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arkaitz Usubiaga-Liaño, Paul Ekins
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8266fe7d6e9c481f9e4d871d44e670b9
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8266fe7d6e9c481f9e4d871d44e670b9
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8266fe7d6e9c481f9e4d871d44e670b92021-12-01T05:01:51ZMonitoring the environmental sustainability of countries through the strong environmental sustainability index1470-160X10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108281https://doaj.org/article/8266fe7d6e9c481f9e4d871d44e670b92021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21009468https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160XCountries still lack adequate metrics to monitor environmental sustainability across a range of relevant environmental and resource issues. The Strong Environmental Sustainability Index (SESI), which is based on the Environmental Sustainability Gap (ESGAP) framework, is intended to fill this gap. SESI is the result of aggregating 21 indicators across different dimensions. Each of the underlying indicators is related to the functions of natural capital and normalised using science-based targets. SESI uses the geometric mean to aggregate in order to reflect the limited substitutability between the functions of natural capital.The results of the index, which is computed for 28 European countries, show that several functions of natural capital are impaired in Europe. Countries tend to perform worse in indicators related to pollution and ecosystem health, compared to indicators that describe the provision of natural resources, and human health and welfare. Because the results are sensitive to assumptions in the normalisation, weighting and aggregation processes, the relevant choices have been aligned with the theoretical underpinnings of the ESGAP framework. SESI responds to the demands of the ‘Beyond GDP’ community on the need for a single environmental sustainability metric that can complement GDP in its (mis-)use as a headline indicator for development.Arkaitz Usubiaga-LiañoPaul EkinsElsevierarticleESGAPStrong Environmental Sustainability IndexEnvironmental sustainabilitySustainability gapEnvironmental indicatorsEcologyQH540-549.5ENEcological Indicators, Vol 132, Iss , Pp 108281- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic ESGAP
Strong Environmental Sustainability Index
Environmental sustainability
Sustainability gap
Environmental indicators
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle ESGAP
Strong Environmental Sustainability Index
Environmental sustainability
Sustainability gap
Environmental indicators
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Arkaitz Usubiaga-Liaño
Paul Ekins
Monitoring the environmental sustainability of countries through the strong environmental sustainability index
description Countries still lack adequate metrics to monitor environmental sustainability across a range of relevant environmental and resource issues. The Strong Environmental Sustainability Index (SESI), which is based on the Environmental Sustainability Gap (ESGAP) framework, is intended to fill this gap. SESI is the result of aggregating 21 indicators across different dimensions. Each of the underlying indicators is related to the functions of natural capital and normalised using science-based targets. SESI uses the geometric mean to aggregate in order to reflect the limited substitutability between the functions of natural capital.The results of the index, which is computed for 28 European countries, show that several functions of natural capital are impaired in Europe. Countries tend to perform worse in indicators related to pollution and ecosystem health, compared to indicators that describe the provision of natural resources, and human health and welfare. Because the results are sensitive to assumptions in the normalisation, weighting and aggregation processes, the relevant choices have been aligned with the theoretical underpinnings of the ESGAP framework. SESI responds to the demands of the ‘Beyond GDP’ community on the need for a single environmental sustainability metric that can complement GDP in its (mis-)use as a headline indicator for development.
format article
author Arkaitz Usubiaga-Liaño
Paul Ekins
author_facet Arkaitz Usubiaga-Liaño
Paul Ekins
author_sort Arkaitz Usubiaga-Liaño
title Monitoring the environmental sustainability of countries through the strong environmental sustainability index
title_short Monitoring the environmental sustainability of countries through the strong environmental sustainability index
title_full Monitoring the environmental sustainability of countries through the strong environmental sustainability index
title_fullStr Monitoring the environmental sustainability of countries through the strong environmental sustainability index
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring the environmental sustainability of countries through the strong environmental sustainability index
title_sort monitoring the environmental sustainability of countries through the strong environmental sustainability index
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/8266fe7d6e9c481f9e4d871d44e670b9
work_keys_str_mv AT arkaitzusubiagaliano monitoringtheenvironmentalsustainabilityofcountriesthroughthestrongenvironmentalsustainabilityindex
AT paulekins monitoringtheenvironmentalsustainabilityofcountriesthroughthestrongenvironmentalsustainabilityindex
_version_ 1718405611367956480