Perturbation-based gene regulatory network inference to unravel oncogenic mechanisms

Abstract The gene regulatory network (GRN) of human cells encodes mechanisms to ensure proper functioning. However, if this GRN is dysregulated, the cell may enter into a disease state such as cancer. Understanding the GRN as a system can therefore help identify novel mechanisms underlying disease,...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daniel Morgan, Matthew Studham, Andreas Tjärnberg, Holger Weishaupt, Fredrik J. Swartling, Torbjörn E. M. Nordling, Erik L. L. Sonnhammer
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2020
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/82d92cd771e2430780af2d03d54742cb
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:82d92cd771e2430780af2d03d54742cb
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:82d92cd771e2430780af2d03d54742cb2021-12-02T19:02:37ZPerturbation-based gene regulatory network inference to unravel oncogenic mechanisms10.1038/s41598-020-70941-y2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/82d92cd771e2430780af2d03d54742cb2020-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70941-yhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The gene regulatory network (GRN) of human cells encodes mechanisms to ensure proper functioning. However, if this GRN is dysregulated, the cell may enter into a disease state such as cancer. Understanding the GRN as a system can therefore help identify novel mechanisms underlying disease, which can lead to new therapies. To deduce regulatory interactions relevant to cancer, we applied a recent computational inference framework to data from perturbation experiments in squamous carcinoma cell line A431. GRNs were inferred using several methods, and the false discovery rate was controlled by the NestBoot framework. We developed a novel approach to assess the predictiveness of inferred GRNs against validation data, despite the lack of a gold standard. The best GRN was significantly more predictive than the null model, both in cross-validated benchmarks and for an independent dataset of the same genes under a different perturbation design. The inferred GRN captures many known regulatory interactions central to cancer-relevant processes in addition to predicting many novel interactions, some of which were experimentally validated, thus providing mechanistic insights that are useful for future cancer research.Daniel MorganMatthew StudhamAndreas TjärnbergHolger WeishauptFredrik J. SwartlingTorbjörn E. M. NordlingErik L. L. SonnhammerNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Daniel Morgan
Matthew Studham
Andreas Tjärnberg
Holger Weishaupt
Fredrik J. Swartling
Torbjörn E. M. Nordling
Erik L. L. Sonnhammer
Perturbation-based gene regulatory network inference to unravel oncogenic mechanisms
description Abstract The gene regulatory network (GRN) of human cells encodes mechanisms to ensure proper functioning. However, if this GRN is dysregulated, the cell may enter into a disease state such as cancer. Understanding the GRN as a system can therefore help identify novel mechanisms underlying disease, which can lead to new therapies. To deduce regulatory interactions relevant to cancer, we applied a recent computational inference framework to data from perturbation experiments in squamous carcinoma cell line A431. GRNs were inferred using several methods, and the false discovery rate was controlled by the NestBoot framework. We developed a novel approach to assess the predictiveness of inferred GRNs against validation data, despite the lack of a gold standard. The best GRN was significantly more predictive than the null model, both in cross-validated benchmarks and for an independent dataset of the same genes under a different perturbation design. The inferred GRN captures many known regulatory interactions central to cancer-relevant processes in addition to predicting many novel interactions, some of which were experimentally validated, thus providing mechanistic insights that are useful for future cancer research.
format article
author Daniel Morgan
Matthew Studham
Andreas Tjärnberg
Holger Weishaupt
Fredrik J. Swartling
Torbjörn E. M. Nordling
Erik L. L. Sonnhammer
author_facet Daniel Morgan
Matthew Studham
Andreas Tjärnberg
Holger Weishaupt
Fredrik J. Swartling
Torbjörn E. M. Nordling
Erik L. L. Sonnhammer
author_sort Daniel Morgan
title Perturbation-based gene regulatory network inference to unravel oncogenic mechanisms
title_short Perturbation-based gene regulatory network inference to unravel oncogenic mechanisms
title_full Perturbation-based gene regulatory network inference to unravel oncogenic mechanisms
title_fullStr Perturbation-based gene regulatory network inference to unravel oncogenic mechanisms
title_full_unstemmed Perturbation-based gene regulatory network inference to unravel oncogenic mechanisms
title_sort perturbation-based gene regulatory network inference to unravel oncogenic mechanisms
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/82d92cd771e2430780af2d03d54742cb
work_keys_str_mv AT danielmorgan perturbationbasedgeneregulatorynetworkinferencetounraveloncogenicmechanisms
AT matthewstudham perturbationbasedgeneregulatorynetworkinferencetounraveloncogenicmechanisms
AT andreastjarnberg perturbationbasedgeneregulatorynetworkinferencetounraveloncogenicmechanisms
AT holgerweishaupt perturbationbasedgeneregulatorynetworkinferencetounraveloncogenicmechanisms
AT fredrikjswartling perturbationbasedgeneregulatorynetworkinferencetounraveloncogenicmechanisms
AT torbjornemnordling perturbationbasedgeneregulatorynetworkinferencetounraveloncogenicmechanisms
AT erikllsonnhammer perturbationbasedgeneregulatorynetworkinferencetounraveloncogenicmechanisms
_version_ 1718377219493986304