Effect of smear layer removal agents on the microhardness and roughness of radicular dentin

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of phytic acid (IP6) on the surface roughness and microhardness of human root canal dentin and compare it to other smear layer removal agents. Materials and methods: Fifty extracted human maxillary incisors were sectioned longitudinally into a total of 100 specimens f...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hosea Lalrin Muana, Mohannad Nassar, Ahmad Dargham, Noriko Hiraishi, Junji Tagami
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/83021a10913f4294a4b5b6f7da84dff5
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:83021a10913f4294a4b5b6f7da84dff5
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:83021a10913f4294a4b5b6f7da84dff52021-11-10T04:18:55ZEffect of smear layer removal agents on the microhardness and roughness of radicular dentin1013-905210.1016/j.sdentj.2020.05.001https://doaj.org/article/83021a10913f4294a4b5b6f7da84dff52021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S101390522030273Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/1013-9052Purpose: To evaluate the effect of phytic acid (IP6) on the surface roughness and microhardness of human root canal dentin and compare it to other smear layer removal agents. Materials and methods: Fifty extracted human maxillary incisors were sectioned longitudinally into a total of 100 specimens followed by embedding in auto-polymerizing acrylic resin. The specimens were polished and then randomly divided into five groups (n = 20) according to the test solution used to condition root canal dentin: 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA); 10% citric acid (CA); 1% IP6; 37% phosphoric acid (PA); or distilled water (control group). Each specimen was treated with a total volume of 1 ml of each solution for 1 min with agitation. Each group was then divided into two subgroups of 10 specimens each. The specimens of the first subgroup were used to determine microhardness, using Vickers hardness tester, and the specimens of the second subgroup were used to measure surface roughness, using a confocal laser scanning microscope. The results were analyzed statistically using one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests, α = 0.05. Results: All the tested groups exhibited microhardness and surface roughness values that were statistically significantly different when compared with the control group (P < 0.05). The microhardness value obtained with IP6 was significantly lower when compared to EDTA, CA, and the control group, whereas its roughness value was significantly higher compared to the aforementioned groups. However, there was no significant difference between IP6 and PA (P > 0.05). Conclusions: IP6 and PA showed the lowest microhardness and the highest surface roughness values.Hosea Lalrin MuanaMohannad NassarAhmad DarghamNoriko HiraishiJunji TagamiElsevierarticleCitric acidEDTAMicrohardnessPhosphoric acidPhytic acidRoughnessMedicineRDentistryRK1-715ENSaudi Dental Journal, Vol 33, Iss 7, Pp 661-665 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Citric acid
EDTA
Microhardness
Phosphoric acid
Phytic acid
Roughness
Medicine
R
Dentistry
RK1-715
spellingShingle Citric acid
EDTA
Microhardness
Phosphoric acid
Phytic acid
Roughness
Medicine
R
Dentistry
RK1-715
Hosea Lalrin Muana
Mohannad Nassar
Ahmad Dargham
Noriko Hiraishi
Junji Tagami
Effect of smear layer removal agents on the microhardness and roughness of radicular dentin
description Purpose: To evaluate the effect of phytic acid (IP6) on the surface roughness and microhardness of human root canal dentin and compare it to other smear layer removal agents. Materials and methods: Fifty extracted human maxillary incisors were sectioned longitudinally into a total of 100 specimens followed by embedding in auto-polymerizing acrylic resin. The specimens were polished and then randomly divided into five groups (n = 20) according to the test solution used to condition root canal dentin: 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA); 10% citric acid (CA); 1% IP6; 37% phosphoric acid (PA); or distilled water (control group). Each specimen was treated with a total volume of 1 ml of each solution for 1 min with agitation. Each group was then divided into two subgroups of 10 specimens each. The specimens of the first subgroup were used to determine microhardness, using Vickers hardness tester, and the specimens of the second subgroup were used to measure surface roughness, using a confocal laser scanning microscope. The results were analyzed statistically using one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests, α = 0.05. Results: All the tested groups exhibited microhardness and surface roughness values that were statistically significantly different when compared with the control group (P < 0.05). The microhardness value obtained with IP6 was significantly lower when compared to EDTA, CA, and the control group, whereas its roughness value was significantly higher compared to the aforementioned groups. However, there was no significant difference between IP6 and PA (P > 0.05). Conclusions: IP6 and PA showed the lowest microhardness and the highest surface roughness values.
format article
author Hosea Lalrin Muana
Mohannad Nassar
Ahmad Dargham
Noriko Hiraishi
Junji Tagami
author_facet Hosea Lalrin Muana
Mohannad Nassar
Ahmad Dargham
Noriko Hiraishi
Junji Tagami
author_sort Hosea Lalrin Muana
title Effect of smear layer removal agents on the microhardness and roughness of radicular dentin
title_short Effect of smear layer removal agents on the microhardness and roughness of radicular dentin
title_full Effect of smear layer removal agents on the microhardness and roughness of radicular dentin
title_fullStr Effect of smear layer removal agents on the microhardness and roughness of radicular dentin
title_full_unstemmed Effect of smear layer removal agents on the microhardness and roughness of radicular dentin
title_sort effect of smear layer removal agents on the microhardness and roughness of radicular dentin
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/83021a10913f4294a4b5b6f7da84dff5
work_keys_str_mv AT hosealalrinmuana effectofsmearlayerremovalagentsonthemicrohardnessandroughnessofradiculardentin
AT mohannadnassar effectofsmearlayerremovalagentsonthemicrohardnessandroughnessofradiculardentin
AT ahmaddargham effectofsmearlayerremovalagentsonthemicrohardnessandroughnessofradiculardentin
AT norikohiraishi effectofsmearlayerremovalagentsonthemicrohardnessandroughnessofradiculardentin
AT junjitagami effectofsmearlayerremovalagentsonthemicrohardnessandroughnessofradiculardentin
_version_ 1718440670095474688