Trueness of ten intraoral scanners in determining the positions of simulated implant scan bodies

Abstract Few investigations have evaluated the 3-dimensional (3D) accuracy of digital implant scans. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of 10 intraoral scanners (IOSs) (CEREC Omnicam, CEREC Primescan, CS 3600, DWIO, i500, iTero Element, PlanScan, Trios 2, Trios 3, and True Definit...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Ryan Jin Young Kim, Goran I. Benic, Ji-Man Park
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/830325d93b1643a7be8707241c1f96e5
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:830325d93b1643a7be8707241c1f96e5
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:830325d93b1643a7be8707241c1f96e52021-12-02T13:24:37ZTrueness of ten intraoral scanners in determining the positions of simulated implant scan bodies10.1038/s41598-021-82218-z2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/830325d93b1643a7be8707241c1f96e52021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82218-zhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Few investigations have evaluated the 3-dimensional (3D) accuracy of digital implant scans. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of 10 intraoral scanners (IOSs) (CEREC Omnicam, CEREC Primescan, CS 3600, DWIO, i500, iTero Element, PlanScan, Trios 2, Trios 3, and True Definition) in obtaining the accurate positions of 6 cylinders simulating implant scan bodies. Digital scans of each IOS were compared with the reference dataset obtained by means of a coordinate measuring machine. Deviation from the actual positions of the 6 cylinders along the XYZ axes and the overall 3D deviation of the digital scan were calculated. The type of IOSs and position of simulated cylindrical scan bodies affected the magnitude and direction of deviations on trueness. The lowest amount of deviation was found at the cylinder next to the reference origin, while the highest deviation was evident at the contralateral side for all IOSs (p < 0.001). Among the tested IOSs, the CEREC Primescan and Trios 3 had the highest trueness followed by i500, Trios 2, and iTero Element, albeit not statistically significant (p > 0.05), and the DWIO and PlasScan had the lowest trueness in partially edentulous mandible digital implant scans (p < 0.001).Ryan Jin Young KimGoran I. BenicJi-Man ParkNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Ryan Jin Young Kim Goran I. Benic Ji-Man Park Trueness of ten intraoral scanners in determining the positions of simulated implant scan bodies
description	Abstract Few investigations have evaluated the 3-dimensional (3D) accuracy of digital implant scans. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of 10 intraoral scanners (IOSs) (CEREC Omnicam, CEREC Primescan, CS 3600, DWIO, i500, iTero Element, PlanScan, Trios 2, Trios 3, and True Definition) in obtaining the accurate positions of 6 cylinders simulating implant scan bodies. Digital scans of each IOS were compared with the reference dataset obtained by means of a coordinate measuring machine. Deviation from the actual positions of the 6 cylinders along the XYZ axes and the overall 3D deviation of the digital scan were calculated. The type of IOSs and position of simulated cylindrical scan bodies affected the magnitude and direction of deviations on trueness. The lowest amount of deviation was found at the cylinder next to the reference origin, while the highest deviation was evident at the contralateral side for all IOSs (p < 0.001). Among the tested IOSs, the CEREC Primescan and Trios 3 had the highest trueness followed by i500, Trios 2, and iTero Element, albeit not statistically significant (p > 0.05), and the DWIO and PlasScan had the lowest trueness in partially edentulous mandible digital implant scans (p < 0.001).
format	article
author	Ryan Jin Young Kim Goran I. Benic Ji-Man Park
author_facet	Ryan Jin Young Kim Goran I. Benic Ji-Man Park
author_sort	Ryan Jin Young Kim
title	Trueness of ten intraoral scanners in determining the positions of simulated implant scan bodies
title_short	Trueness of ten intraoral scanners in determining the positions of simulated implant scan bodies
title_full	Trueness of ten intraoral scanners in determining the positions of simulated implant scan bodies
title_fullStr	Trueness of ten intraoral scanners in determining the positions of simulated implant scan bodies
title_full_unstemmed	Trueness of ten intraoral scanners in determining the positions of simulated implant scan bodies
title_sort	trueness of ten intraoral scanners in determining the positions of simulated implant scan bodies
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/830325d93b1643a7be8707241c1f96e5
work_keys_str_mv	AT ryanjinyoungkim truenessoftenintraoralscannersindeterminingthepositionsofsimulatedimplantscanbodies AT goranibenic truenessoftenintraoralscannersindeterminingthepositionsofsimulatedimplantscanbodies AT jimanpark truenessoftenintraoralscannersindeterminingthepositionsofsimulatedimplantscanbodies
_version_	1718393042410405888

Trueness of ten intraoral scanners in determining the positions of simulated implant scan bodies

Ejemplares similares