From Vietnam to Iraq: Negative trends in television war reporting

In 1876, an American newspaperman with the US 7th Cavalry, Mark Kellogg, declared: ‘I go with Custer, and will be at the death.’ This overtly heroic pronouncement embodies what many still want to believe is the greatest role in journalism: to go up to the fight, to be with ‘the boys’, to expose you...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Tony Maniaty
Format: article
Langue:EN
Publié: Asia Pacific Network 2008
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:https://doaj.org/article/831938d19ec7442ab5cc2c339038c2ce
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
id oai:doaj.org-article:831938d19ec7442ab5cc2c339038c2ce
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:831938d19ec7442ab5cc2c339038c2ce2021-12-02T08:27:37ZFrom Vietnam to Iraq: Negative trends in television war reporting10.24135/pjr.v14i2.9461023-94992324-2035https://doaj.org/article/831938d19ec7442ab5cc2c339038c2ce2008-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/946https://doaj.org/toc/1023-9499https://doaj.org/toc/2324-2035 In 1876, an American newspaperman with the US 7th Cavalry, Mark Kellogg, declared: ‘I go with Custer, and will be at the death.’ This overtly heroic pronouncement embodies what many still want to believe is the greatest role in journalism: to go up to the fight, to be with ‘the boys’, to expose yourself to risk, to get the story and the blood-soaked images, to vividly describe a world of strength and weakness, of courage under fire, of victory and defeat—and, quite possibly, to die. So culturally embedded has this idea become that it raises hopes among thousands of journalism students worldwide that they too might become that holiest of entities in the media pantheon, the television war correspondent. They may find they have left it too late. Accompanied by evolutionary technologies and breathtaking media change, TV war reporting has shifted from an independent style of filmed reportage to live pieces-to-camera from reporters who have little or nothing to say. In this article, I explore how this has come about; offer some views about the resulting negative impact on practitioners and the public; and explain why, in my opinion, our ‘right to know’ about warfare has been seriously eroded as a result. Caption: The technology has improved, but the risks do not go away. Freelancer John Martinkus, author of A Dirty Little War about East Timor, seen here on assignment for SBS Dateline in Kunar province, Afghanistan, in 2005, was kidnapped in Iraq—but he managed to escape. Others have not been so fortunate. Tony ManiatyAsia Pacific Networkarticlearmed conflictconflict journalismconflict reportinginternational journalismtelevision newswar correspondenceCommunication. Mass mediaP87-96Journalism. The periodical press, etc.PN4699-5650ENPacific Journalism Review, Vol 14, Iss 2 (2008)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic armed conflict
conflict journalism
conflict reporting
international journalism
television news
war correspondence
Communication. Mass media
P87-96
Journalism. The periodical press, etc.
PN4699-5650
spellingShingle armed conflict
conflict journalism
conflict reporting
international journalism
television news
war correspondence
Communication. Mass media
P87-96
Journalism. The periodical press, etc.
PN4699-5650
Tony Maniaty
From Vietnam to Iraq: Negative trends in television war reporting
description In 1876, an American newspaperman with the US 7th Cavalry, Mark Kellogg, declared: ‘I go with Custer, and will be at the death.’ This overtly heroic pronouncement embodies what many still want to believe is the greatest role in journalism: to go up to the fight, to be with ‘the boys’, to expose yourself to risk, to get the story and the blood-soaked images, to vividly describe a world of strength and weakness, of courage under fire, of victory and defeat—and, quite possibly, to die. So culturally embedded has this idea become that it raises hopes among thousands of journalism students worldwide that they too might become that holiest of entities in the media pantheon, the television war correspondent. They may find they have left it too late. Accompanied by evolutionary technologies and breathtaking media change, TV war reporting has shifted from an independent style of filmed reportage to live pieces-to-camera from reporters who have little or nothing to say. In this article, I explore how this has come about; offer some views about the resulting negative impact on practitioners and the public; and explain why, in my opinion, our ‘right to know’ about warfare has been seriously eroded as a result. Caption: The technology has improved, but the risks do not go away. Freelancer John Martinkus, author of A Dirty Little War about East Timor, seen here on assignment for SBS Dateline in Kunar province, Afghanistan, in 2005, was kidnapped in Iraq—but he managed to escape. Others have not been so fortunate.
format article
author Tony Maniaty
author_facet Tony Maniaty
author_sort Tony Maniaty
title From Vietnam to Iraq: Negative trends in television war reporting
title_short From Vietnam to Iraq: Negative trends in television war reporting
title_full From Vietnam to Iraq: Negative trends in television war reporting
title_fullStr From Vietnam to Iraq: Negative trends in television war reporting
title_full_unstemmed From Vietnam to Iraq: Negative trends in television war reporting
title_sort from vietnam to iraq: negative trends in television war reporting
publisher Asia Pacific Network
publishDate 2008
url https://doaj.org/article/831938d19ec7442ab5cc2c339038c2ce
work_keys_str_mv AT tonymaniaty fromvietnamtoiraqnegativetrendsintelevisionwarreporting
_version_ 1718398495579176960