Evaluating Digital Scholarship: Suggestions and Strategies for the Text Encoding Initiative
As part of a larger pilot study on the evaluation of digital scholarship, we consider what role, if any, the TEI Consortium and user community might play in evaluating scholarship that utilize the TEI tag set. Our rationale for focusing on the role of the TEI Consortium in the discussion of evaluati...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | DE EN ES FR IT |
Publicado: |
OpenEdition
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/833659107fdb4d418b43bf5e531d8a4e |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:833659107fdb4d418b43bf5e531d8a4e |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:833659107fdb4d418b43bf5e531d8a4e2021-12-02T11:30:50ZEvaluating Digital Scholarship: Suggestions and Strategies for the Text Encoding Initiative2162-560310.4000/jtei.949https://doaj.org/article/833659107fdb4d418b43bf5e531d8a4e2014-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journals.openedition.org/jtei/949https://doaj.org/toc/2162-5603As part of a larger pilot study on the evaluation of digital scholarship, we consider what role, if any, the TEI Consortium and user community might play in evaluating scholarship that utilize the TEI tag set. Our rationale for focusing on the role of the TEI Consortium in the discussion of evaluation is twofold. First, the TEI Guidelines represents an encoding standard for texts that is supported by a large community actively interested in the application and development of these standards. Second, feedback concerning evaluation criteria for digital scholarship has not been explicitly gathered from the TEI community and may provide additional understanding of the value, process, and assessment of text encoding. Determining what to evaluate and how to do so reveals the community’s definitions of scholarship in general. The clarification and articulation of evaluation criteria, therefore, remains a high priority as digital scholarship continues to develop.Sarah L. PfannenschmidtTanya E. ClementOpenEditionarticleevaluation criteriadigital scholarshippilot studytext encodingComputer engineering. Computer hardwareTK7885-7895DEENESFRITJournal of the Text Encoding Initiative, Vol 7 (2014) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
DE EN ES FR IT |
topic |
evaluation criteria digital scholarship pilot study text encoding Computer engineering. Computer hardware TK7885-7895 |
spellingShingle |
evaluation criteria digital scholarship pilot study text encoding Computer engineering. Computer hardware TK7885-7895 Sarah L. Pfannenschmidt Tanya E. Clement Evaluating Digital Scholarship: Suggestions and Strategies for the Text Encoding Initiative |
description |
As part of a larger pilot study on the evaluation of digital scholarship, we consider what role, if any, the TEI Consortium and user community might play in evaluating scholarship that utilize the TEI tag set. Our rationale for focusing on the role of the TEI Consortium in the discussion of evaluation is twofold. First, the TEI Guidelines represents an encoding standard for texts that is supported by a large community actively interested in the application and development of these standards. Second, feedback concerning evaluation criteria for digital scholarship has not been explicitly gathered from the TEI community and may provide additional understanding of the value, process, and assessment of text encoding. Determining what to evaluate and how to do so reveals the community’s definitions of scholarship in general. The clarification and articulation of evaluation criteria, therefore, remains a high priority as digital scholarship continues to develop. |
format |
article |
author |
Sarah L. Pfannenschmidt Tanya E. Clement |
author_facet |
Sarah L. Pfannenschmidt Tanya E. Clement |
author_sort |
Sarah L. Pfannenschmidt |
title |
Evaluating Digital Scholarship: Suggestions and Strategies for the Text Encoding Initiative |
title_short |
Evaluating Digital Scholarship: Suggestions and Strategies for the Text Encoding Initiative |
title_full |
Evaluating Digital Scholarship: Suggestions and Strategies for the Text Encoding Initiative |
title_fullStr |
Evaluating Digital Scholarship: Suggestions and Strategies for the Text Encoding Initiative |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluating Digital Scholarship: Suggestions and Strategies for the Text Encoding Initiative |
title_sort |
evaluating digital scholarship: suggestions and strategies for the text encoding initiative |
publisher |
OpenEdition |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/833659107fdb4d418b43bf5e531d8a4e |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sarahlpfannenschmidt evaluatingdigitalscholarshipsuggestionsandstrategiesforthetextencodinginitiative AT tanyaeclement evaluatingdigitalscholarshipsuggestionsandstrategiesforthetextencodinginitiative |
_version_ |
1718395888196386816 |