Evaluating Digital Scholarship: Suggestions and Strategies for the Text Encoding Initiative

As part of a larger pilot study on the evaluation of digital scholarship, we consider what role, if any, the TEI Consortium and user community might play in evaluating scholarship that utilize the TEI tag set. Our rationale for focusing on the role of the TEI Consortium in the discussion of evaluati...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sarah L. Pfannenschmidt, Tanya E. Clement
Formato: article
Lenguaje:DE
EN
ES
FR
IT
Publicado: OpenEdition 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/833659107fdb4d418b43bf5e531d8a4e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:833659107fdb4d418b43bf5e531d8a4e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:833659107fdb4d418b43bf5e531d8a4e2021-12-02T11:30:50ZEvaluating Digital Scholarship: Suggestions and Strategies for the Text Encoding Initiative2162-560310.4000/jtei.949https://doaj.org/article/833659107fdb4d418b43bf5e531d8a4e2014-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journals.openedition.org/jtei/949https://doaj.org/toc/2162-5603As part of a larger pilot study on the evaluation of digital scholarship, we consider what role, if any, the TEI Consortium and user community might play in evaluating scholarship that utilize the TEI tag set. Our rationale for focusing on the role of the TEI Consortium in the discussion of evaluation is twofold. First, the TEI Guidelines represents an encoding standard for texts that is supported by a large community actively interested in the application and development of these standards. Second, feedback concerning evaluation criteria for digital scholarship has not been explicitly gathered from the TEI community and may provide additional understanding of the value, process, and assessment of text encoding. Determining what to evaluate and how to do so reveals the community’s definitions of scholarship in general. The clarification and articulation of evaluation criteria, therefore, remains a high priority as digital scholarship continues to develop.Sarah L. PfannenschmidtTanya E. ClementOpenEditionarticleevaluation criteriadigital scholarshippilot studytext encodingComputer engineering. Computer hardwareTK7885-7895DEENESFRITJournal of the Text Encoding Initiative, Vol 7 (2014)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language DE
EN
ES
FR
IT
topic evaluation criteria
digital scholarship
pilot study
text encoding
Computer engineering. Computer hardware
TK7885-7895
spellingShingle evaluation criteria
digital scholarship
pilot study
text encoding
Computer engineering. Computer hardware
TK7885-7895
Sarah L. Pfannenschmidt
Tanya E. Clement
Evaluating Digital Scholarship: Suggestions and Strategies for the Text Encoding Initiative
description As part of a larger pilot study on the evaluation of digital scholarship, we consider what role, if any, the TEI Consortium and user community might play in evaluating scholarship that utilize the TEI tag set. Our rationale for focusing on the role of the TEI Consortium in the discussion of evaluation is twofold. First, the TEI Guidelines represents an encoding standard for texts that is supported by a large community actively interested in the application and development of these standards. Second, feedback concerning evaluation criteria for digital scholarship has not been explicitly gathered from the TEI community and may provide additional understanding of the value, process, and assessment of text encoding. Determining what to evaluate and how to do so reveals the community’s definitions of scholarship in general. The clarification and articulation of evaluation criteria, therefore, remains a high priority as digital scholarship continues to develop.
format article
author Sarah L. Pfannenschmidt
Tanya E. Clement
author_facet Sarah L. Pfannenschmidt
Tanya E. Clement
author_sort Sarah L. Pfannenschmidt
title Evaluating Digital Scholarship: Suggestions and Strategies for the Text Encoding Initiative
title_short Evaluating Digital Scholarship: Suggestions and Strategies for the Text Encoding Initiative
title_full Evaluating Digital Scholarship: Suggestions and Strategies for the Text Encoding Initiative
title_fullStr Evaluating Digital Scholarship: Suggestions and Strategies for the Text Encoding Initiative
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Digital Scholarship: Suggestions and Strategies for the Text Encoding Initiative
title_sort evaluating digital scholarship: suggestions and strategies for the text encoding initiative
publisher OpenEdition
publishDate 2014
url https://doaj.org/article/833659107fdb4d418b43bf5e531d8a4e
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahlpfannenschmidt evaluatingdigitalscholarshipsuggestionsandstrategiesforthetextencodinginitiative
AT tanyaeclement evaluatingdigitalscholarshipsuggestionsandstrategiesforthetextencodinginitiative
_version_ 1718395888196386816