Limited benefit of additional contrast-enhanced CT to end-of-treatment PET/CT evaluation in patients with follicular lymphoma

Abstract Despite follicular lymphoma (FL) is frequently characterized by a moderate increase of glucose metabolism, PET/CT examinations provides valuable information for staging and response assessment of the disease. The aim of the study was to assess and compare the diagnostic performance of PET/l...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gaetano Paone, Mariana Raditchkova-Sarnelli, Teresa Ruberto-Macchi, Marco Cuzzocrea, Emanuele Zucca, Luca Ceriani, Luca Giovanella
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8347340d625b42e5b72a349754e0ed01
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8347340d625b42e5b72a349754e0ed01
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8347340d625b42e5b72a349754e0ed012021-12-02T18:49:53ZLimited benefit of additional contrast-enhanced CT to end-of-treatment PET/CT evaluation in patients with follicular lymphoma10.1038/s41598-021-98081-x2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/8347340d625b42e5b72a349754e0ed012021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98081-xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Despite follicular lymphoma (FL) is frequently characterized by a moderate increase of glucose metabolism, PET/CT examinations provides valuable information for staging and response assessment of the disease. The aim of the study was to assess and compare the diagnostic performance of PET/ldCT and PET/ceCT, respectively, in evaluating FL patients at the end of treatment. Fifty FL consecutive patients who underwent end-of-therapy PET/CT with both ldCT and ceCT were analyzed. Two blinded observers independently assessed PET/ldCT and PET/ceCT applying the Deauville score (DS) and Lugano classification criteria. PET imaging obtained after the end-of-treatment (EoT) was classified as showing PET and ce-CT matched response (concordant imaging group, CIG) or PET and ce-CT unmatched response (discordant imaging group, DIG). Relapse rate and Event-Free Survival (EFS) were compared between CIG and DIG patients. Overall, no differences in metabolic response classification were observed between PET/ldCT and PET/ceCT. In 13 (26%) patients PET/ceCT identified additional FDG-negative nodal lesions in mesenteric, retroperitoneal and iliac regions. However, in all cases, final DS remained unchanged and the additional results did not modify the following therapeutic decision. Among patients, who obtained complete metabolic response a comparable rate of relapse was registered in DIG 3/13 (23%) and CIG subgroups 5/20 (25%) [p = 0.899]. In all 3 DIG cohort patients who relapsed the recurrent disease involved also, but not exclusively, PET negative lymph nodes detected by ceCT. In overall population metabolic response defined by PET/ldCT predicted EFS [76% (group of patients with metabolic response) vs 35% (group of patients with residual disease), p = 0.0013] significantly better than ceCT-Based response assessment [75% (group of patients with complete response) vs 53% (group of patients with residual disease), p = 0.06]. Our study demonstrates a negligible diagnostic and predictive value of ceCT performed in addition to standard 18FDG PET/ldCT for EoT response evaluation in FLs. PET/ldCT should be performed as first-line imaging procedure, also in patients with prevalent abdominal and pelvic involvement, limiting the acquisition of ceCT in selected cases. This tailored approach would contribute to avoid useless radiation exposure and preserve renal function of patients.Gaetano PaoneMariana Raditchkova-SarnelliTeresa Ruberto-MacchiMarco CuzzocreaEmanuele ZuccaLuca CerianiLuca GiovanellaNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Gaetano Paone
Mariana Raditchkova-Sarnelli
Teresa Ruberto-Macchi
Marco Cuzzocrea
Emanuele Zucca
Luca Ceriani
Luca Giovanella
Limited benefit of additional contrast-enhanced CT to end-of-treatment PET/CT evaluation in patients with follicular lymphoma
description Abstract Despite follicular lymphoma (FL) is frequently characterized by a moderate increase of glucose metabolism, PET/CT examinations provides valuable information for staging and response assessment of the disease. The aim of the study was to assess and compare the diagnostic performance of PET/ldCT and PET/ceCT, respectively, in evaluating FL patients at the end of treatment. Fifty FL consecutive patients who underwent end-of-therapy PET/CT with both ldCT and ceCT were analyzed. Two blinded observers independently assessed PET/ldCT and PET/ceCT applying the Deauville score (DS) and Lugano classification criteria. PET imaging obtained after the end-of-treatment (EoT) was classified as showing PET and ce-CT matched response (concordant imaging group, CIG) or PET and ce-CT unmatched response (discordant imaging group, DIG). Relapse rate and Event-Free Survival (EFS) were compared between CIG and DIG patients. Overall, no differences in metabolic response classification were observed between PET/ldCT and PET/ceCT. In 13 (26%) patients PET/ceCT identified additional FDG-negative nodal lesions in mesenteric, retroperitoneal and iliac regions. However, in all cases, final DS remained unchanged and the additional results did not modify the following therapeutic decision. Among patients, who obtained complete metabolic response a comparable rate of relapse was registered in DIG 3/13 (23%) and CIG subgroups 5/20 (25%) [p = 0.899]. In all 3 DIG cohort patients who relapsed the recurrent disease involved also, but not exclusively, PET negative lymph nodes detected by ceCT. In overall population metabolic response defined by PET/ldCT predicted EFS [76% (group of patients with metabolic response) vs 35% (group of patients with residual disease), p = 0.0013] significantly better than ceCT-Based response assessment [75% (group of patients with complete response) vs 53% (group of patients with residual disease), p = 0.06]. Our study demonstrates a negligible diagnostic and predictive value of ceCT performed in addition to standard 18FDG PET/ldCT for EoT response evaluation in FLs. PET/ldCT should be performed as first-line imaging procedure, also in patients with prevalent abdominal and pelvic involvement, limiting the acquisition of ceCT in selected cases. This tailored approach would contribute to avoid useless radiation exposure and preserve renal function of patients.
format article
author Gaetano Paone
Mariana Raditchkova-Sarnelli
Teresa Ruberto-Macchi
Marco Cuzzocrea
Emanuele Zucca
Luca Ceriani
Luca Giovanella
author_facet Gaetano Paone
Mariana Raditchkova-Sarnelli
Teresa Ruberto-Macchi
Marco Cuzzocrea
Emanuele Zucca
Luca Ceriani
Luca Giovanella
author_sort Gaetano Paone
title Limited benefit of additional contrast-enhanced CT to end-of-treatment PET/CT evaluation in patients with follicular lymphoma
title_short Limited benefit of additional contrast-enhanced CT to end-of-treatment PET/CT evaluation in patients with follicular lymphoma
title_full Limited benefit of additional contrast-enhanced CT to end-of-treatment PET/CT evaluation in patients with follicular lymphoma
title_fullStr Limited benefit of additional contrast-enhanced CT to end-of-treatment PET/CT evaluation in patients with follicular lymphoma
title_full_unstemmed Limited benefit of additional contrast-enhanced CT to end-of-treatment PET/CT evaluation in patients with follicular lymphoma
title_sort limited benefit of additional contrast-enhanced ct to end-of-treatment pet/ct evaluation in patients with follicular lymphoma
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/8347340d625b42e5b72a349754e0ed01
work_keys_str_mv AT gaetanopaone limitedbenefitofadditionalcontrastenhancedcttoendoftreatmentpetctevaluationinpatientswithfollicularlymphoma
AT marianaraditchkovasarnelli limitedbenefitofadditionalcontrastenhancedcttoendoftreatmentpetctevaluationinpatientswithfollicularlymphoma
AT teresarubertomacchi limitedbenefitofadditionalcontrastenhancedcttoendoftreatmentpetctevaluationinpatientswithfollicularlymphoma
AT marcocuzzocrea limitedbenefitofadditionalcontrastenhancedcttoendoftreatmentpetctevaluationinpatientswithfollicularlymphoma
AT emanuelezucca limitedbenefitofadditionalcontrastenhancedcttoendoftreatmentpetctevaluationinpatientswithfollicularlymphoma
AT lucaceriani limitedbenefitofadditionalcontrastenhancedcttoendoftreatmentpetctevaluationinpatientswithfollicularlymphoma
AT lucagiovanella limitedbenefitofadditionalcontrastenhancedcttoendoftreatmentpetctevaluationinpatientswithfollicularlymphoma
_version_ 1718377515478679552