Alterations in Gastric Mucosal Microbiota in Gastric Carcinogenesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The gastric microbiota profile alters during gastric carcinogenesis. We aimed to identify the alterations in the alpha diversity and relative abundance of bacterial phyla and genera of gastric microbiota in the development of gastric cancer (GC).Methods: The systematic review was perform...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yingyun Yang, Ruoyu Ji, Xinyu Zhao, Xinyuan Cao, Qiang Wang, Qingwei Jiang, Yizhen Zhang, Weiyang Zheng, Xi Wu, Aiming Yang
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8352e62551184811916dba70ad1afa11
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8352e62551184811916dba70ad1afa11
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8352e62551184811916dba70ad1afa112021-12-03T05:27:38ZAlterations in Gastric Mucosal Microbiota in Gastric Carcinogenesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis2296-858X10.3389/fmed.2021.754959https://doaj.org/article/8352e62551184811916dba70ad1afa112021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2021.754959/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2296-858XBackground: The gastric microbiota profile alters during gastric carcinogenesis. We aimed to identify the alterations in the alpha diversity and relative abundance of bacterial phyla and genera of gastric microbiota in the development of gastric cancer (GC).Methods: The systematic review was performed based on a published protocol with the registration number CRD42020206973. We searched through PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases, as well as conference proceedings and references of review articles (May 2021) for observational studies reporting either the relative abundance of bacterial phyla or genera, or alpha diversity indexes in both GC and non-cancer groups. Selection of studies and data extraction were performed independently by two researchers, with disagreements resolved through discussion. Risk of bias was assessed using the self-modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results of random-effects meta-analyses were presented as mean differences (MD).Results: Our systematic review included 751 GC patients and 792 non-cancer patients from 14 case-control studies. Gastric cancer group had fewer operational taxonomic units (OTUs) (MD = −68.52, 95%CI: −126.65 to −10.39) and a lower Simpson index (MD = −0.13, 95%CI: −0.20 to −0.07) compared with non-cancer group. At the phylum level, gastric cancer group had a higher abundance of Firmicutes (MD = 7.11, 95%CI: 1.76 to 12.46). At the genus level, Streptococcus (MD = 3.03, 95%CI: 0.07 to 6.00) and Lactobacillus (MD = 5.15, 95%CI: 1.27 to 9.04) were found to be enriched in GCgroup. The relative abundance of the rest bacterial phyla or genera analyzed in our study did not significantly differ between two groups. Subgroup analyses indicated that the source of samples was the major source of interstudy heterogeneity.Conclusion: This systematic review suggested that gastric microbiota dysbiosis occurred in gastric carcinogenesis, with alpha diversity declined and microbiota composition altered.Yingyun YangRuoyu JiXinyu ZhaoXinyuan CaoQiang WangQingwei JiangYizhen ZhangWeiyang ZhengXi WuAiming YangFrontiers Media S.A.articlegastric microbiotagastric cancerdysbiosisstomach microhabitatmeta-analysisMedicine (General)R5-920ENFrontiers in Medicine, Vol 8 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic gastric microbiota
gastric cancer
dysbiosis
stomach microhabitat
meta-analysis
Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle gastric microbiota
gastric cancer
dysbiosis
stomach microhabitat
meta-analysis
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Yingyun Yang
Ruoyu Ji
Xinyu Zhao
Xinyuan Cao
Qiang Wang
Qingwei Jiang
Yizhen Zhang
Weiyang Zheng
Xi Wu
Aiming Yang
Alterations in Gastric Mucosal Microbiota in Gastric Carcinogenesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
description Background: The gastric microbiota profile alters during gastric carcinogenesis. We aimed to identify the alterations in the alpha diversity and relative abundance of bacterial phyla and genera of gastric microbiota in the development of gastric cancer (GC).Methods: The systematic review was performed based on a published protocol with the registration number CRD42020206973. We searched through PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases, as well as conference proceedings and references of review articles (May 2021) for observational studies reporting either the relative abundance of bacterial phyla or genera, or alpha diversity indexes in both GC and non-cancer groups. Selection of studies and data extraction were performed independently by two researchers, with disagreements resolved through discussion. Risk of bias was assessed using the self-modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results of random-effects meta-analyses were presented as mean differences (MD).Results: Our systematic review included 751 GC patients and 792 non-cancer patients from 14 case-control studies. Gastric cancer group had fewer operational taxonomic units (OTUs) (MD = −68.52, 95%CI: −126.65 to −10.39) and a lower Simpson index (MD = −0.13, 95%CI: −0.20 to −0.07) compared with non-cancer group. At the phylum level, gastric cancer group had a higher abundance of Firmicutes (MD = 7.11, 95%CI: 1.76 to 12.46). At the genus level, Streptococcus (MD = 3.03, 95%CI: 0.07 to 6.00) and Lactobacillus (MD = 5.15, 95%CI: 1.27 to 9.04) were found to be enriched in GCgroup. The relative abundance of the rest bacterial phyla or genera analyzed in our study did not significantly differ between two groups. Subgroup analyses indicated that the source of samples was the major source of interstudy heterogeneity.Conclusion: This systematic review suggested that gastric microbiota dysbiosis occurred in gastric carcinogenesis, with alpha diversity declined and microbiota composition altered.
format article
author Yingyun Yang
Ruoyu Ji
Xinyu Zhao
Xinyuan Cao
Qiang Wang
Qingwei Jiang
Yizhen Zhang
Weiyang Zheng
Xi Wu
Aiming Yang
author_facet Yingyun Yang
Ruoyu Ji
Xinyu Zhao
Xinyuan Cao
Qiang Wang
Qingwei Jiang
Yizhen Zhang
Weiyang Zheng
Xi Wu
Aiming Yang
author_sort Yingyun Yang
title Alterations in Gastric Mucosal Microbiota in Gastric Carcinogenesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Alterations in Gastric Mucosal Microbiota in Gastric Carcinogenesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Alterations in Gastric Mucosal Microbiota in Gastric Carcinogenesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Alterations in Gastric Mucosal Microbiota in Gastric Carcinogenesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Alterations in Gastric Mucosal Microbiota in Gastric Carcinogenesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort alterations in gastric mucosal microbiota in gastric carcinogenesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/8352e62551184811916dba70ad1afa11
work_keys_str_mv AT yingyunyang alterationsingastricmucosalmicrobiotaingastriccarcinogenesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ruoyuji alterationsingastricmucosalmicrobiotaingastriccarcinogenesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xinyuzhao alterationsingastricmucosalmicrobiotaingastriccarcinogenesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xinyuancao alterationsingastricmucosalmicrobiotaingastriccarcinogenesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT qiangwang alterationsingastricmucosalmicrobiotaingastriccarcinogenesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT qingweijiang alterationsingastricmucosalmicrobiotaingastriccarcinogenesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yizhenzhang alterationsingastricmucosalmicrobiotaingastriccarcinogenesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT weiyangzheng alterationsingastricmucosalmicrobiotaingastriccarcinogenesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiwu alterationsingastricmucosalmicrobiotaingastriccarcinogenesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT aimingyang alterationsingastricmucosalmicrobiotaingastriccarcinogenesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1718373941462958080