Wpływ procedury współdecydowania na wyniki reformy wspólnej polityki rolnej Unii Europejskiej 2014-2020

Impact of Codecision on the 2014‑2020 Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy The article attempts to assess the impact of co‑decision procedure (ordinary legislative procedure) on the shape of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) reform for the period 2014‑2020. First, procedural models used in...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Katarzyna Kosior
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
PL
Publicado: Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing 2021
Materias:
Law
K
J
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/835d6ad15362450386f51ab1ee6bb331
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:835d6ad15362450386f51ab1ee6bb331
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:835d6ad15362450386f51ab1ee6bb3312021-11-27T13:08:20ZWpływ procedury współdecydowania na wyniki reformy wspólnej polityki rolnej Unii Europejskiej 2014-202010.12797/Politeja.12.2015.37.161733-67162391-6737https://doaj.org/article/835d6ad15362450386f51ab1ee6bb3312021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.akademicka.pl/politeja/article/view/2291https://doaj.org/toc/1733-6716https://doaj.org/toc/2391-6737 Impact of Codecision on the 2014‑2020 Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy The article attempts to assess the impact of co‑decision procedure (ordinary legislative procedure) on the shape of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) reform for the period 2014‑2020. First, procedural models used in the analysis of decision‑making in the European Union are discussed. The second part of the article highlights the process and the results of recent reforms of the CAP. Legislative proposals of the European Commission and the negotiations between the EU Council, the European Parliament and the Commission concerning the CAP after 2013 are analyzed. The final part of the article evaluates the CAP reform from the perspective of procedural models. The analysis indicates that the new decision‑making procedure has not fundamentally affected the results of the reform. The European Parliament’s role in the process of reforming the CAP has been limited both due to inadequate institutional preparation and insufficient expertise in agricultural policy matters. In some areas, the results achieved under the co‑decision procedure were closer to the status quo point than the results predicted by the model of consultation procedure. The inclusion of the European Parliament to the decision‑making process has not broadened the range of represented interests. On the contrary, one could observe an increased dominance of agricultural interest groups in the decision‑making process. In conclusion, the introduction of co‑decision procedure has not increased the chances for a fundamental reform in the CAP. Also, it has not strengthened the democratic legitimacy of the policy. Katarzyna KosiorKsiegarnia Akademicka PublishingarticleWspólna Polityka Rolna UEprocedury legislacyjne UEreformyLawKPolitical scienceJENPLPoliteja, Vol 12, Iss 5 (37) (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
PL
topic Wspólna Polityka Rolna UE
procedury legislacyjne UE
reformy
Law
K
Political science
J
spellingShingle Wspólna Polityka Rolna UE
procedury legislacyjne UE
reformy
Law
K
Political science
J
Katarzyna Kosior
Wpływ procedury współdecydowania na wyniki reformy wspólnej polityki rolnej Unii Europejskiej 2014-2020
description Impact of Codecision on the 2014‑2020 Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy The article attempts to assess the impact of co‑decision procedure (ordinary legislative procedure) on the shape of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) reform for the period 2014‑2020. First, procedural models used in the analysis of decision‑making in the European Union are discussed. The second part of the article highlights the process and the results of recent reforms of the CAP. Legislative proposals of the European Commission and the negotiations between the EU Council, the European Parliament and the Commission concerning the CAP after 2013 are analyzed. The final part of the article evaluates the CAP reform from the perspective of procedural models. The analysis indicates that the new decision‑making procedure has not fundamentally affected the results of the reform. The European Parliament’s role in the process of reforming the CAP has been limited both due to inadequate institutional preparation and insufficient expertise in agricultural policy matters. In some areas, the results achieved under the co‑decision procedure were closer to the status quo point than the results predicted by the model of consultation procedure. The inclusion of the European Parliament to the decision‑making process has not broadened the range of represented interests. On the contrary, one could observe an increased dominance of agricultural interest groups in the decision‑making process. In conclusion, the introduction of co‑decision procedure has not increased the chances for a fundamental reform in the CAP. Also, it has not strengthened the democratic legitimacy of the policy.
format article
author Katarzyna Kosior
author_facet Katarzyna Kosior
author_sort Katarzyna Kosior
title Wpływ procedury współdecydowania na wyniki reformy wspólnej polityki rolnej Unii Europejskiej 2014-2020
title_short Wpływ procedury współdecydowania na wyniki reformy wspólnej polityki rolnej Unii Europejskiej 2014-2020
title_full Wpływ procedury współdecydowania na wyniki reformy wspólnej polityki rolnej Unii Europejskiej 2014-2020
title_fullStr Wpływ procedury współdecydowania na wyniki reformy wspólnej polityki rolnej Unii Europejskiej 2014-2020
title_full_unstemmed Wpływ procedury współdecydowania na wyniki reformy wspólnej polityki rolnej Unii Europejskiej 2014-2020
title_sort wpływ procedury współdecydowania na wyniki reformy wspólnej polityki rolnej unii europejskiej 2014-2020
publisher Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/835d6ad15362450386f51ab1ee6bb331
work_keys_str_mv AT katarzynakosior wpływprocedurywspołdecydowanianawynikireformywspolnejpolitykirolnejuniieuropejskiej20142020
_version_ 1718408754079203328