Politics of Psychoanalytic Knowledge: Canguilhem’s Reading of Freud

Georges Canguilhem has never systematically discussed Sigmund Freud’s thinking. This essay aims to reconstruct Canguilhem’s reading of Freudian psychoanalysis, highlighting its strategic use within the framework of Canguilhem’s controversy against psychology. From this point of view, knowledge is es...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Annagiulia Canesso
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN IT
Publicado:	University of Bologna 2021
Materias:	georges canguilhem sigmund freud psychoanalysis thought subjectivity Political science (General) JA1-92
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/83694b919d8a42e48796877a90b413b4
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:83694b919d8a42e48796877a90b413b4
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:83694b919d8a42e48796877a90b413b42021-11-08T15:41:08ZPolitics of Psychoanalytic Knowledge: Canguilhem’s Reading of Freud1590-49461825-961810.6092/issn.1825-9618/13782https://doaj.org/article/83694b919d8a42e48796877a90b413b42021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://scienzaepolitica.unibo.it/article/view/13782https://doaj.org/toc/1590-4946https://doaj.org/toc/1825-9618Georges Canguilhem has never systematically discussed Sigmund Freud’s thinking. This essay aims to reconstruct Canguilhem’s reading of Freudian psychoanalysis, highlighting its strategic use within the framework of Canguilhem’s controversy against psychology. From this point of view, knowledge is established as a field of political struggle: unlike psychology and its deterministic and normalizing drifts, psychoanalysis allows Canguilhem to affirm the irreducibility of thought to brain localizations, to emphasize its erratic power and to think the constitution of an eccentric subjectivity.Annagiulia CanessoUniversity of Bolognaarticlegeorges canguilhemsigmund freudpsychoanalysisthoughtsubjectivityPolitical science (General)JA1-92ENITScienza & Politica, Vol 33, Iss 64, Pp 91-110 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN IT
topic	georges canguilhem sigmund freud psychoanalysis thought subjectivity Political science (General) JA1-92
spellingShingle	georges canguilhem sigmund freud psychoanalysis thought subjectivity Political science (General) JA1-92 Annagiulia Canesso Politics of Psychoanalytic Knowledge: Canguilhem’s Reading of Freud
description	Georges Canguilhem has never systematically discussed Sigmund Freud’s thinking. This essay aims to reconstruct Canguilhem’s reading of Freudian psychoanalysis, highlighting its strategic use within the framework of Canguilhem’s controversy against psychology. From this point of view, knowledge is established as a field of political struggle: unlike psychology and its deterministic and normalizing drifts, psychoanalysis allows Canguilhem to affirm the irreducibility of thought to brain localizations, to emphasize its erratic power and to think the constitution of an eccentric subjectivity.
format	article
author	Annagiulia Canesso
author_facet	Annagiulia Canesso
author_sort	Annagiulia Canesso
title	Politics of Psychoanalytic Knowledge: Canguilhem’s Reading of Freud
title_short	Politics of Psychoanalytic Knowledge: Canguilhem’s Reading of Freud
title_full	Politics of Psychoanalytic Knowledge: Canguilhem’s Reading of Freud
title_fullStr	Politics of Psychoanalytic Knowledge: Canguilhem’s Reading of Freud
title_full_unstemmed	Politics of Psychoanalytic Knowledge: Canguilhem’s Reading of Freud
title_sort	politics of psychoanalytic knowledge: canguilhem’s reading of freud
publisher	University of Bologna
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/83694b919d8a42e48796877a90b413b4
work_keys_str_mv	AT annagiuliacanesso politicsofpsychoanalyticknowledgecanguilhemsreadingoffreud
_version_	1718441766914359296

Politics of Psychoanalytic Knowledge: Canguilhem’s Reading of Freud

Ejemplares similares