Comparison of modified ADM and classical finite difference method for some third-order and fifth-order KdV equations

The KdV equation, which appears as an asymptotic model in physical systems ranging from water waves to plasma physics, has been studied. In this paper, we are concerned with dispersive nonlinear KdV equations by using two reliable methods: Shehu Adomian decomposition method (STADM) and the classical...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Appadu Appanah Rao, Kelil Abey Sherif
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: De Gruyter 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/83786f6978294ebbb129326a6c66911b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:83786f6978294ebbb129326a6c66911b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:83786f6978294ebbb129326a6c66911b2021-12-05T14:10:45ZComparison of modified ADM and classical finite difference method for some third-order and fifth-order KdV equations2391-466110.1515/dema-2021-0039https://doaj.org/article/83786f6978294ebbb129326a6c66911b2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1515/dema-2021-0039https://doaj.org/toc/2391-4661The KdV equation, which appears as an asymptotic model in physical systems ranging from water waves to plasma physics, has been studied. In this paper, we are concerned with dispersive nonlinear KdV equations by using two reliable methods: Shehu Adomian decomposition method (STADM) and the classical finite difference method for solving three numerical experiments. STADM is constructed by combining Shehu’s transform and Adomian decomposition method, and the nonlinear terms can be easily handled using Adomian’s polynomials. The Shehu transform is used to accelerate the convergence of the solution series in most cases and to overcome the deficiency that is mainly caused by unsatisfied conditions in other analytical techniques. We compare the approximate and numerical results with the exact solution for the two numerical experiments. The third numerical experiment does not have an exact solution and we compare profiles from the two methods vs the space domain at some values of time. This study provides us with information about which of the two methods are effective based on the numerical experiment chosen. Knowledge acquired will enable us to construct methods for other related partial differential equations such as stochastic Korteweg-de Vries (KdV), KdV-Burgers, and fractional KdV equations.Appadu Appanah RaoKelil Abey SherifDe Gruyterarticlemodified adomian decomposition methodclassical finite difference methodnonlinear kdv equationsblow up35a2535a2234a45MathematicsQA1-939ENDemonstratio Mathematica, Vol 54, Iss 1, Pp 377-409 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic modified adomian decomposition method
classical finite difference method
nonlinear kdv equations
blow up
35a25
35a22
34a45
Mathematics
QA1-939
spellingShingle modified adomian decomposition method
classical finite difference method
nonlinear kdv equations
blow up
35a25
35a22
34a45
Mathematics
QA1-939
Appadu Appanah Rao
Kelil Abey Sherif
Comparison of modified ADM and classical finite difference method for some third-order and fifth-order KdV equations
description The KdV equation, which appears as an asymptotic model in physical systems ranging from water waves to plasma physics, has been studied. In this paper, we are concerned with dispersive nonlinear KdV equations by using two reliable methods: Shehu Adomian decomposition method (STADM) and the classical finite difference method for solving three numerical experiments. STADM is constructed by combining Shehu’s transform and Adomian decomposition method, and the nonlinear terms can be easily handled using Adomian’s polynomials. The Shehu transform is used to accelerate the convergence of the solution series in most cases and to overcome the deficiency that is mainly caused by unsatisfied conditions in other analytical techniques. We compare the approximate and numerical results with the exact solution for the two numerical experiments. The third numerical experiment does not have an exact solution and we compare profiles from the two methods vs the space domain at some values of time. This study provides us with information about which of the two methods are effective based on the numerical experiment chosen. Knowledge acquired will enable us to construct methods for other related partial differential equations such as stochastic Korteweg-de Vries (KdV), KdV-Burgers, and fractional KdV equations.
format article
author Appadu Appanah Rao
Kelil Abey Sherif
author_facet Appadu Appanah Rao
Kelil Abey Sherif
author_sort Appadu Appanah Rao
title Comparison of modified ADM and classical finite difference method for some third-order and fifth-order KdV equations
title_short Comparison of modified ADM and classical finite difference method for some third-order and fifth-order KdV equations
title_full Comparison of modified ADM and classical finite difference method for some third-order and fifth-order KdV equations
title_fullStr Comparison of modified ADM and classical finite difference method for some third-order and fifth-order KdV equations
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of modified ADM and classical finite difference method for some third-order and fifth-order KdV equations
title_sort comparison of modified adm and classical finite difference method for some third-order and fifth-order kdv equations
publisher De Gruyter
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/83786f6978294ebbb129326a6c66911b
work_keys_str_mv AT appaduappanahrao comparisonofmodifiedadmandclassicalfinitedifferencemethodforsomethirdorderandfifthorderkdvequations
AT kelilabeysherif comparisonofmodifiedadmandclassicalfinitedifferencemethodforsomethirdorderandfifthorderkdvequations
_version_ 1718371765064826880