Comparison of modified ADM and classical finite difference method for some third-order and fifth-order KdV equations
The KdV equation, which appears as an asymptotic model in physical systems ranging from water waves to plasma physics, has been studied. In this paper, we are concerned with dispersive nonlinear KdV equations by using two reliable methods: Shehu Adomian decomposition method (STADM) and the classical...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
De Gruyter
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/83786f6978294ebbb129326a6c66911b |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:83786f6978294ebbb129326a6c66911b |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:83786f6978294ebbb129326a6c66911b2021-12-05T14:10:45ZComparison of modified ADM and classical finite difference method for some third-order and fifth-order KdV equations2391-466110.1515/dema-2021-0039https://doaj.org/article/83786f6978294ebbb129326a6c66911b2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1515/dema-2021-0039https://doaj.org/toc/2391-4661The KdV equation, which appears as an asymptotic model in physical systems ranging from water waves to plasma physics, has been studied. In this paper, we are concerned with dispersive nonlinear KdV equations by using two reliable methods: Shehu Adomian decomposition method (STADM) and the classical finite difference method for solving three numerical experiments. STADM is constructed by combining Shehu’s transform and Adomian decomposition method, and the nonlinear terms can be easily handled using Adomian’s polynomials. The Shehu transform is used to accelerate the convergence of the solution series in most cases and to overcome the deficiency that is mainly caused by unsatisfied conditions in other analytical techniques. We compare the approximate and numerical results with the exact solution for the two numerical experiments. The third numerical experiment does not have an exact solution and we compare profiles from the two methods vs the space domain at some values of time. This study provides us with information about which of the two methods are effective based on the numerical experiment chosen. Knowledge acquired will enable us to construct methods for other related partial differential equations such as stochastic Korteweg-de Vries (KdV), KdV-Burgers, and fractional KdV equations.Appadu Appanah RaoKelil Abey SherifDe Gruyterarticlemodified adomian decomposition methodclassical finite difference methodnonlinear kdv equationsblow up35a2535a2234a45MathematicsQA1-939ENDemonstratio Mathematica, Vol 54, Iss 1, Pp 377-409 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
modified adomian decomposition method classical finite difference method nonlinear kdv equations blow up 35a25 35a22 34a45 Mathematics QA1-939 |
spellingShingle |
modified adomian decomposition method classical finite difference method nonlinear kdv equations blow up 35a25 35a22 34a45 Mathematics QA1-939 Appadu Appanah Rao Kelil Abey Sherif Comparison of modified ADM and classical finite difference method for some third-order and fifth-order KdV equations |
description |
The KdV equation, which appears as an asymptotic model in physical systems ranging from water waves to plasma physics, has been studied. In this paper, we are concerned with dispersive nonlinear KdV equations by using two reliable methods: Shehu Adomian decomposition method (STADM) and the classical finite difference method for solving three numerical experiments. STADM is constructed by combining Shehu’s transform and Adomian decomposition method, and the nonlinear terms can be easily handled using Adomian’s polynomials. The Shehu transform is used to accelerate the convergence of the solution series in most cases and to overcome the deficiency that is mainly caused by unsatisfied conditions in other analytical techniques. We compare the approximate and numerical results with the exact solution for the two numerical experiments. The third numerical experiment does not have an exact solution and we compare profiles from the two methods vs the space domain at some values of time. This study provides us with information about which of the two methods are effective based on the numerical experiment chosen. Knowledge acquired will enable us to construct methods for other related partial differential equations such as stochastic Korteweg-de Vries (KdV), KdV-Burgers, and fractional KdV equations. |
format |
article |
author |
Appadu Appanah Rao Kelil Abey Sherif |
author_facet |
Appadu Appanah Rao Kelil Abey Sherif |
author_sort |
Appadu Appanah Rao |
title |
Comparison of modified ADM and classical finite difference method for some third-order and fifth-order KdV equations |
title_short |
Comparison of modified ADM and classical finite difference method for some third-order and fifth-order KdV equations |
title_full |
Comparison of modified ADM and classical finite difference method for some third-order and fifth-order KdV equations |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of modified ADM and classical finite difference method for some third-order and fifth-order KdV equations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of modified ADM and classical finite difference method for some third-order and fifth-order KdV equations |
title_sort |
comparison of modified adm and classical finite difference method for some third-order and fifth-order kdv equations |
publisher |
De Gruyter |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/83786f6978294ebbb129326a6c66911b |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT appaduappanahrao comparisonofmodifiedadmandclassicalfinitedifferencemethodforsomethirdorderandfifthorderkdvequations AT kelilabeysherif comparisonofmodifiedadmandclassicalfinitedifferencemethodforsomethirdorderandfifthorderkdvequations |
_version_ |
1718371765064826880 |