Trends in Non-invasive Prenatal Screening and Invasive Testing in Denmark (2000–2019) and Israel (2011–2019)

Introduction: Following the wide distribution of non-invasive prenatal genetic screening (NIPS), numerous studies have reported a decline in total invasive tests in the recent years, up to 50–70% in some countries. However, in Denmark and Israel we have not experienced these declines. The objective...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lena Sagi-Dain, Amihood Singer, Olav B. Petersen, Stina Lou, Ida Vogel
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/837d6e54c04e4c5eab9a6e01afad5d31
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:837d6e54c04e4c5eab9a6e01afad5d31
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:837d6e54c04e4c5eab9a6e01afad5d312021-11-17T05:26:15ZTrends in Non-invasive Prenatal Screening and Invasive Testing in Denmark (2000–2019) and Israel (2011–2019)2296-858X10.3389/fmed.2021.768997https://doaj.org/article/837d6e54c04e4c5eab9a6e01afad5d312021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2021.768997/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2296-858XIntroduction: Following the wide distribution of non-invasive prenatal genetic screening (NIPS), numerous studies have reported a decline in total invasive tests in the recent years, up to 50–70% in some countries. However, in Denmark and Israel we have not experienced these declines. The objective of our study was to evaluate the trends in NIPS and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) use in Denmark and Israel.Methods: This retrospective study was performed by data acquisition from the Danish Cytogenetics Central Registry throughout the years 2000–2019, and Israeli Public Health Services, Ministry of Health computerized database (from 2011).Results: Of the 1,243,956 live births registered in Denmark over the years 2000–2019, a relatively steady level of invasive testing around 6% was noted since 2004, as opposed to 13.0% in Israel based on 1,594,962 live births between 2011 and 2019. The average uptake of NIPS was 1.1 ± 0.5% in Denmark vs. 4.3% in Israel (2013–2019). Relatively steady rates of invasive testing were noted in both countries, compared to a slight decline in NIPS in the recent years.Discussion: The recent decrease in the rates of invasive testing in the NIPS era was not observed in Denmark or in Israel. These results imply that Danish and Israeli women and/or health providers might favor the high resolution and yield of CMA testing over the non-invasiveness of NIPS. We explore and discuss this phenomenon, based on five central factors.Lena Sagi-DainAmihood SingerOlav B. PetersenOlav B. PetersenStina LouIda VogelIda VogelFrontiers Media S.A.articlechromosomal microarray analysischromosome aberrationprenatal testingnon-invasive prenatal screeninginvasive testingMedicine (General)R5-920ENFrontiers in Medicine, Vol 8 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic chromosomal microarray analysis
chromosome aberration
prenatal testing
non-invasive prenatal screening
invasive testing
Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle chromosomal microarray analysis
chromosome aberration
prenatal testing
non-invasive prenatal screening
invasive testing
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Lena Sagi-Dain
Amihood Singer
Olav B. Petersen
Olav B. Petersen
Stina Lou
Ida Vogel
Ida Vogel
Trends in Non-invasive Prenatal Screening and Invasive Testing in Denmark (2000–2019) and Israel (2011–2019)
description Introduction: Following the wide distribution of non-invasive prenatal genetic screening (NIPS), numerous studies have reported a decline in total invasive tests in the recent years, up to 50–70% in some countries. However, in Denmark and Israel we have not experienced these declines. The objective of our study was to evaluate the trends in NIPS and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) use in Denmark and Israel.Methods: This retrospective study was performed by data acquisition from the Danish Cytogenetics Central Registry throughout the years 2000–2019, and Israeli Public Health Services, Ministry of Health computerized database (from 2011).Results: Of the 1,243,956 live births registered in Denmark over the years 2000–2019, a relatively steady level of invasive testing around 6% was noted since 2004, as opposed to 13.0% in Israel based on 1,594,962 live births between 2011 and 2019. The average uptake of NIPS was 1.1 ± 0.5% in Denmark vs. 4.3% in Israel (2013–2019). Relatively steady rates of invasive testing were noted in both countries, compared to a slight decline in NIPS in the recent years.Discussion: The recent decrease in the rates of invasive testing in the NIPS era was not observed in Denmark or in Israel. These results imply that Danish and Israeli women and/or health providers might favor the high resolution and yield of CMA testing over the non-invasiveness of NIPS. We explore and discuss this phenomenon, based on five central factors.
format article
author Lena Sagi-Dain
Amihood Singer
Olav B. Petersen
Olav B. Petersen
Stina Lou
Ida Vogel
Ida Vogel
author_facet Lena Sagi-Dain
Amihood Singer
Olav B. Petersen
Olav B. Petersen
Stina Lou
Ida Vogel
Ida Vogel
author_sort Lena Sagi-Dain
title Trends in Non-invasive Prenatal Screening and Invasive Testing in Denmark (2000–2019) and Israel (2011–2019)
title_short Trends in Non-invasive Prenatal Screening and Invasive Testing in Denmark (2000–2019) and Israel (2011–2019)
title_full Trends in Non-invasive Prenatal Screening and Invasive Testing in Denmark (2000–2019) and Israel (2011–2019)
title_fullStr Trends in Non-invasive Prenatal Screening and Invasive Testing in Denmark (2000–2019) and Israel (2011–2019)
title_full_unstemmed Trends in Non-invasive Prenatal Screening and Invasive Testing in Denmark (2000–2019) and Israel (2011–2019)
title_sort trends in non-invasive prenatal screening and invasive testing in denmark (2000–2019) and israel (2011–2019)
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/837d6e54c04e4c5eab9a6e01afad5d31
work_keys_str_mv AT lenasagidain trendsinnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningandinvasivetestingindenmark20002019andisrael20112019
AT amihoodsinger trendsinnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningandinvasivetestingindenmark20002019andisrael20112019
AT olavbpetersen trendsinnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningandinvasivetestingindenmark20002019andisrael20112019
AT olavbpetersen trendsinnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningandinvasivetestingindenmark20002019andisrael20112019
AT stinalou trendsinnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningandinvasivetestingindenmark20002019andisrael20112019
AT idavogel trendsinnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningandinvasivetestingindenmark20002019andisrael20112019
AT idavogel trendsinnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningandinvasivetestingindenmark20002019andisrael20112019
_version_ 1718425937256644608