Do patient engagement interventions work for all patients? A systematic review and realist synthesis of interventions to enhance patient safety

Abstract Background Patients are increasingly being asked for feedback about their healthcare and treatment, including safety, despite little evidence to support this trend. This review identifies the strategies used to engage patients in safety during direct care, explores who is engaged and determ...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Bronwyn Newman, Kathryn Joseph, Ashfaq Chauhan, Holly Seale, Jiadai Li, Elizabeth Manias, Merrilyn Walton, Stephen Mears, Benjamin Jones, Reema Harrison
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Wiley 2021
Materias:	patient engagement patient participation patient safety point of care systematic review Medicine (General) R5-920 Public aspects of medicine RA1-1270
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/83bc4cebffbb46e7873c4bed93391ffb
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:83bc4cebffbb46e7873c4bed93391ffb
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:83bc4cebffbb46e7873c4bed93391ffb2021-11-29T13:50:52ZDo patient engagement interventions work for all patients? A systematic review and realist synthesis of interventions to enhance patient safety1369-76251369-651310.1111/hex.13343https://doaj.org/article/83bc4cebffbb46e7873c4bed93391ffb2021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13343https://doaj.org/toc/1369-6513https://doaj.org/toc/1369-7625Abstract Background Patients are increasingly being asked for feedback about their healthcare and treatment, including safety, despite little evidence to support this trend. This review identifies the strategies used to engage patients in safety during direct care, explores who is engaged and determines the mechanisms that impact effectiveness. Methods A systematic review was performed of seven databases (CINAHL, Cochrane, Cochrane‐Central, Embase, ISI Web of Science, Medline, PsycINFO) that included research published between 2010 and 2020 focused on patient engagement interventions to increase safety during direct care and reported using PRISMA. All research designs were eligible; two reviewers applied criteria independently to determine eligibility and quality. A narrative review and realist synthesis were conducted. Results Twenty‐six papers reporting on twenty‐seven patient engagement strategies were included and classified as consultation (9), involvement (7) and partnership (11). The definitions of ‘patient engagement’ varied, and we found limited details about participant characteristics or interactions between people utilizing strategies. Collaborative strategy development, a user‐friendly design, proactive messaging and agency sponsorship were identified as mechanisms to improve engagement about safety at the point of direct care. Conclusions Agency sponsorship of collaboration between staff and patients is essential in the development and implementation of strategies to keep patients safe during direct care. Insufficient details about participant characteristics and patient–provider interactions limit recommendations for practice change. More needs to be learned about how patients are engaged in discussions about safety, particularly minority groups unable to engage with standard information. Patient or Public Contribution Review progress was reported to the CanEngage team, including the consumer steering group, to inform project priorities (PROSPERO CRD42020196453).Bronwyn NewmanKathryn JosephAshfaq ChauhanHolly SealeJiadai LiElizabeth ManiasMerrilyn WaltonStephen MearsBenjamin JonesReema HarrisonWileyarticlepatient engagementpatient participationpatient safetypoint of caresystematic reviewMedicine (General)R5-920Public aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENHealth Expectations, Vol 24, Iss 6, Pp 1905-1923 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	patient engagement patient participation patient safety point of care systematic review Medicine (General) R5-920 Public aspects of medicine RA1-1270
spellingShingle	patient engagement patient participation patient safety point of care systematic review Medicine (General) R5-920 Public aspects of medicine RA1-1270 Bronwyn Newman Kathryn Joseph Ashfaq Chauhan Holly Seale Jiadai Li Elizabeth Manias Merrilyn Walton Stephen Mears Benjamin Jones Reema Harrison Do patient engagement interventions work for all patients? A systematic review and realist synthesis of interventions to enhance patient safety
description	Abstract Background Patients are increasingly being asked for feedback about their healthcare and treatment, including safety, despite little evidence to support this trend. This review identifies the strategies used to engage patients in safety during direct care, explores who is engaged and determines the mechanisms that impact effectiveness. Methods A systematic review was performed of seven databases (CINAHL, Cochrane, Cochrane‐Central, Embase, ISI Web of Science, Medline, PsycINFO) that included research published between 2010 and 2020 focused on patient engagement interventions to increase safety during direct care and reported using PRISMA. All research designs were eligible; two reviewers applied criteria independently to determine eligibility and quality. A narrative review and realist synthesis were conducted. Results Twenty‐six papers reporting on twenty‐seven patient engagement strategies were included and classified as consultation (9), involvement (7) and partnership (11). The definitions of ‘patient engagement’ varied, and we found limited details about participant characteristics or interactions between people utilizing strategies. Collaborative strategy development, a user‐friendly design, proactive messaging and agency sponsorship were identified as mechanisms to improve engagement about safety at the point of direct care. Conclusions Agency sponsorship of collaboration between staff and patients is essential in the development and implementation of strategies to keep patients safe during direct care. Insufficient details about participant characteristics and patient–provider interactions limit recommendations for practice change. More needs to be learned about how patients are engaged in discussions about safety, particularly minority groups unable to engage with standard information. Patient or Public Contribution Review progress was reported to the CanEngage team, including the consumer steering group, to inform project priorities (PROSPERO CRD42020196453).
format	article
author	Bronwyn Newman Kathryn Joseph Ashfaq Chauhan Holly Seale Jiadai Li Elizabeth Manias Merrilyn Walton Stephen Mears Benjamin Jones Reema Harrison
author_facet	Bronwyn Newman Kathryn Joseph Ashfaq Chauhan Holly Seale Jiadai Li Elizabeth Manias Merrilyn Walton Stephen Mears Benjamin Jones Reema Harrison
author_sort	Bronwyn Newman
title	Do patient engagement interventions work for all patients? A systematic review and realist synthesis of interventions to enhance patient safety
title_short	Do patient engagement interventions work for all patients? A systematic review and realist synthesis of interventions to enhance patient safety
title_full	Do patient engagement interventions work for all patients? A systematic review and realist synthesis of interventions to enhance patient safety
title_fullStr	Do patient engagement interventions work for all patients? A systematic review and realist synthesis of interventions to enhance patient safety
title_full_unstemmed	Do patient engagement interventions work for all patients? A systematic review and realist synthesis of interventions to enhance patient safety
title_sort	do patient engagement interventions work for all patients? a systematic review and realist synthesis of interventions to enhance patient safety
publisher	Wiley
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/83bc4cebffbb46e7873c4bed93391ffb
work_keys_str_mv	AT bronwynnewman dopatientengagementinterventionsworkforallpatientsasystematicreviewandrealistsynthesisofinterventionstoenhancepatientsafety AT kathrynjoseph dopatientengagementinterventionsworkforallpatientsasystematicreviewandrealistsynthesisofinterventionstoenhancepatientsafety AT ashfaqchauhan dopatientengagementinterventionsworkforallpatientsasystematicreviewandrealistsynthesisofinterventionstoenhancepatientsafety AT hollyseale dopatientengagementinterventionsworkforallpatientsasystematicreviewandrealistsynthesisofinterventionstoenhancepatientsafety AT jiadaili dopatientengagementinterventionsworkforallpatientsasystematicreviewandrealistsynthesisofinterventionstoenhancepatientsafety AT elizabethmanias dopatientengagementinterventionsworkforallpatientsasystematicreviewandrealistsynthesisofinterventionstoenhancepatientsafety AT merrilynwalton dopatientengagementinterventionsworkforallpatientsasystematicreviewandrealistsynthesisofinterventionstoenhancepatientsafety AT stephenmears dopatientengagementinterventionsworkforallpatientsasystematicreviewandrealistsynthesisofinterventionstoenhancepatientsafety AT benjaminjones dopatientengagementinterventionsworkforallpatientsasystematicreviewandrealistsynthesisofinterventionstoenhancepatientsafety AT reemaharrison dopatientengagementinterventionsworkforallpatientsasystematicreviewandrealistsynthesisofinterventionstoenhancepatientsafety
_version_	1718407355693006848

Do patient engagement interventions work for all patients? A systematic review and realist synthesis of interventions to enhance patient safety

Ejemplares similares