Supported Decision-Making in Persons With Dementia: Development of an Enhanced Consent Procedure for Lumbar Puncture

The right to make autonomous decisions is enshrined in law. However, the question how persons with cognitive deficits can be enabled to make autonomous decisions has not been satisfactorily addressed. In particular, the concept of supported decision-making and its implementation into practice has be...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Theresa S. Wied, Julia Haberstroh, Jakov Gather, Tarik Karakaya, Frank Oswald, Mishal Qubad, Matthé Scholten, Jochen Vollmann, Johannes Pantel, The ENSURE Consortium, Theresa Wied, Nathalia Álvarez Lata, José-Antonio Seoane, Ana Sofia Carvalho, Pablo Hernández Marrero
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/83d724ee8ae948c0b5cedb030378f978
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:83d724ee8ae948c0b5cedb030378f978
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:83d724ee8ae948c0b5cedb030378f9782021-11-16T07:29:49ZSupported Decision-Making in Persons With Dementia: Development of an Enhanced Consent Procedure for Lumbar Puncture1664-064010.3389/fpsyt.2021.780276https://doaj.org/article/83d724ee8ae948c0b5cedb030378f9782021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.780276/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/1664-0640The right to make autonomous decisions is enshrined in law. However, the question how persons with cognitive deficits can be enabled to make autonomous decisions has not been satisfactorily addressed. In particular, the concept of supported decision-making and its implementation into practice has been poorly explored for persons with dementia (PwD).This article describes the empirical development and implementation of support tools to enhance informed consent processes (so called enhanced consent procedures/ECP) for PwD on whether to undergo lumbar puncture. In the end of the process of pilot testing and further development of the tools, the following tools were defined: (1) Standardized Interview Structure, (2) Elaborated Plain Language, (3) Ambience and Room Design, (4) Keyword Lists, (5) Priority Cards, (6) Visualization, and (7) Simplified Written Informed Consent (Patient Information), as well as the general attitude (8) Person-Centered Attitude of the facilitator. As the development, implementation and evaluation of ECP tools is one objective of the transnational ENSURE project, we also include an overview of future empirical procedures. So far, our findings can serve as a selection of possibilities to support PwD in decision-making and help practitioners achieve an appropriate balance between the autonomy and protection of PwD in complex decision-making situation. Future studies should address the question if the proposed set of tools is effective to enhance informed consent processes in PwD.Theresa S. WiedJulia HaberstrohJakov GatherJakov GatherTarik KarakayaFrank OswaldMishal QubadMatthé ScholtenJochen VollmannJohannes PantelThe ENSURE ConsortiumJulia HaberstrohFrank OswaldJohannes PantelTheresa WiedJakov GatherMatthé ScholtenJochen VollmannNathalia Álvarez LataJosé-Antonio SeoaneAna Sofia CarvalhoPablo Hernández MarreroFrontiers Media S.A.articledementiasupported decision-makinginformed consentautonomylumbar puncturePsychiatryRC435-571ENFrontiers in Psychiatry, Vol 12 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic dementia
supported decision-making
informed consent
autonomy
lumbar puncture
Psychiatry
RC435-571
spellingShingle dementia
supported decision-making
informed consent
autonomy
lumbar puncture
Psychiatry
RC435-571
Theresa S. Wied
Julia Haberstroh
Jakov Gather
Jakov Gather
Tarik Karakaya
Frank Oswald
Mishal Qubad
Matthé Scholten
Jochen Vollmann
Johannes Pantel
The ENSURE Consortium
Julia Haberstroh
Frank Oswald
Johannes Pantel
Theresa Wied
Jakov Gather
Matthé Scholten
Jochen Vollmann
Nathalia Álvarez Lata
José-Antonio Seoane
Ana Sofia Carvalho
Pablo Hernández Marrero
Supported Decision-Making in Persons With Dementia: Development of an Enhanced Consent Procedure for Lumbar Puncture
description The right to make autonomous decisions is enshrined in law. However, the question how persons with cognitive deficits can be enabled to make autonomous decisions has not been satisfactorily addressed. In particular, the concept of supported decision-making and its implementation into practice has been poorly explored for persons with dementia (PwD).This article describes the empirical development and implementation of support tools to enhance informed consent processes (so called enhanced consent procedures/ECP) for PwD on whether to undergo lumbar puncture. In the end of the process of pilot testing and further development of the tools, the following tools were defined: (1) Standardized Interview Structure, (2) Elaborated Plain Language, (3) Ambience and Room Design, (4) Keyword Lists, (5) Priority Cards, (6) Visualization, and (7) Simplified Written Informed Consent (Patient Information), as well as the general attitude (8) Person-Centered Attitude of the facilitator. As the development, implementation and evaluation of ECP tools is one objective of the transnational ENSURE project, we also include an overview of future empirical procedures. So far, our findings can serve as a selection of possibilities to support PwD in decision-making and help practitioners achieve an appropriate balance between the autonomy and protection of PwD in complex decision-making situation. Future studies should address the question if the proposed set of tools is effective to enhance informed consent processes in PwD.
format article
author Theresa S. Wied
Julia Haberstroh
Jakov Gather
Jakov Gather
Tarik Karakaya
Frank Oswald
Mishal Qubad
Matthé Scholten
Jochen Vollmann
Johannes Pantel
The ENSURE Consortium
Julia Haberstroh
Frank Oswald
Johannes Pantel
Theresa Wied
Jakov Gather
Matthé Scholten
Jochen Vollmann
Nathalia Álvarez Lata
José-Antonio Seoane
Ana Sofia Carvalho
Pablo Hernández Marrero
author_facet Theresa S. Wied
Julia Haberstroh
Jakov Gather
Jakov Gather
Tarik Karakaya
Frank Oswald
Mishal Qubad
Matthé Scholten
Jochen Vollmann
Johannes Pantel
The ENSURE Consortium
Julia Haberstroh
Frank Oswald
Johannes Pantel
Theresa Wied
Jakov Gather
Matthé Scholten
Jochen Vollmann
Nathalia Álvarez Lata
José-Antonio Seoane
Ana Sofia Carvalho
Pablo Hernández Marrero
author_sort Theresa S. Wied
title Supported Decision-Making in Persons With Dementia: Development of an Enhanced Consent Procedure for Lumbar Puncture
title_short Supported Decision-Making in Persons With Dementia: Development of an Enhanced Consent Procedure for Lumbar Puncture
title_full Supported Decision-Making in Persons With Dementia: Development of an Enhanced Consent Procedure for Lumbar Puncture
title_fullStr Supported Decision-Making in Persons With Dementia: Development of an Enhanced Consent Procedure for Lumbar Puncture
title_full_unstemmed Supported Decision-Making in Persons With Dementia: Development of an Enhanced Consent Procedure for Lumbar Puncture
title_sort supported decision-making in persons with dementia: development of an enhanced consent procedure for lumbar puncture
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/83d724ee8ae948c0b5cedb030378f978
work_keys_str_mv AT theresaswied supporteddecisionmakinginpersonswithdementiadevelopmentofanenhancedconsentprocedureforlumbarpuncture
AT juliahaberstroh supporteddecisionmakinginpersonswithdementiadevelopmentofanenhancedconsentprocedureforlumbarpuncture
AT jakovgather supporteddecisionmakinginpersonswithdementiadevelopmentofanenhancedconsentprocedureforlumbarpuncture
AT jakovgather supporteddecisionmakinginpersonswithdementiadevelopmentofanenhancedconsentprocedureforlumbarpuncture
AT tarikkarakaya supporteddecisionmakinginpersonswithdementiadevelopmentofanenhancedconsentprocedureforlumbarpuncture
AT frankoswald supporteddecisionmakinginpersonswithdementiadevelopmentofanenhancedconsentprocedureforlumbarpuncture
AT mishalqubad supporteddecisionmakinginpersonswithdementiadevelopmentofanenhancedconsentprocedureforlumbarpuncture
AT matthescholten supporteddecisionmakinginpersonswithdementiadevelopmentofanenhancedconsentprocedureforlumbarpuncture
AT jochenvollmann supporteddecisionmakinginpersonswithdementiadevelopmentofanenhancedconsentprocedureforlumbarpuncture
AT johannespantel supporteddecisionmakinginpersonswithdementiadevelopmentofanenhancedconsentprocedureforlumbarpuncture
AT theensureconsortium supporteddecisionmakinginpersonswithdementiadevelopmentofanenhancedconsentprocedureforlumbarpuncture
AT juliahaberstroh supporteddecisionmakinginpersonswithdementiadevelopmentofanenhancedconsentprocedureforlumbarpuncture
AT frankoswald supporteddecisionmakinginpersonswithdementiadevelopmentofanenhancedconsentprocedureforlumbarpuncture
AT johannespantel supporteddecisionmakinginpersonswithdementiadevelopmentofanenhancedconsentprocedureforlumbarpuncture
AT theresawied supporteddecisionmakinginpersonswithdementiadevelopmentofanenhancedconsentprocedureforlumbarpuncture
AT jakovgather supporteddecisionmakinginpersonswithdementiadevelopmentofanenhancedconsentprocedureforlumbarpuncture
AT matthescholten supporteddecisionmakinginpersonswithdementiadevelopmentofanenhancedconsentprocedureforlumbarpuncture
AT jochenvollmann supporteddecisionmakinginpersonswithdementiadevelopmentofanenhancedconsentprocedureforlumbarpuncture
AT nathaliaalvarezlata supporteddecisionmakinginpersonswithdementiadevelopmentofanenhancedconsentprocedureforlumbarpuncture
AT joseantonioseoane supporteddecisionmakinginpersonswithdementiadevelopmentofanenhancedconsentprocedureforlumbarpuncture
AT anasofiacarvalho supporteddecisionmakinginpersonswithdementiadevelopmentofanenhancedconsentprocedureforlumbarpuncture
AT pablohernandezmarrero supporteddecisionmakinginpersonswithdementiadevelopmentofanenhancedconsentprocedureforlumbarpuncture
_version_ 1718426614305390592