The Effect of Monochromatic LED Light Wavelengths and Photoperiods on <i>Botrytis cinerea</i>
<i>Botrytis cinerea</i> is a ubiquitous necrotrophic pathogen causing grey mould in economically important crops. Light effect in horticulture is undeniable and fungi also react to light. Selected specific light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and photoperiods can be used for fungal pathogen inhi...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/83feb2f733cc4f1299988556a135d058 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:83feb2f733cc4f1299988556a135d058 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:83feb2f733cc4f1299988556a135d0582021-11-25T18:06:17ZThe Effect of Monochromatic LED Light Wavelengths and Photoperiods on <i>Botrytis cinerea</i>10.3390/jof71109702309-608Xhttps://doaj.org/article/83feb2f733cc4f1299988556a135d0582021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2309-608X/7/11/970https://doaj.org/toc/2309-608X<i>Botrytis cinerea</i> is a ubiquitous necrotrophic pathogen causing grey mould in economically important crops. Light effect in horticulture is undeniable and fungi also react to light. Selected specific light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and photoperiods can be used for fungal pathogen inhibition. This study aimed to evaluate how LED light wavelengths and photoperiods affect the growth parameters of <i>B. cinerea</i>. The morphological (mycelium appearance, sclerotia distribution) and phenotypic (conidia presence and size, mycelium growth rate, recovery) characteristics of the fungal pathogen <i>B. cinerea</i> were evaluated under royal blue 455 nm, blue 470 nm, cyan 505 nm, yellow 590 nm, and red 627 nm LED lights at various photoperiods (4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 h). The results revealed that the light conditions and photoperiods influenced the <i>B. cinerea</i> morphological and phenotypic characteristics. Overall, the highest <i>B. cinerea</i> inhibition was under yellow (590 nm) LED light at 4 and 8 h photoperiods. Conidia did not form under blue 455 nm at 8, 16, 20, and 24 h photoperiods. Therefore, it can be assumed that the phenotypic and morphological features of <i>B. cinerea</i> depend on the specific photoperiod and LED light wavelength. The results allowed an exploration of original research approaches, raised new scientific questions for further investigation, and suggested new green plant protection solutions.Neringa RasiukevičiūtėAušra BrazaitytėViktorija Vaštakaitė-KairienėAsta KupčinskienėPavelas DuchovskisGiedrė SamuolienėAlma ValiuškaitėMDPI AGarticleinhibitionlight-emitting diodemyceliumpathogenrecoveryBiology (General)QH301-705.5ENJournal of Fungi, Vol 7, Iss 970, p 970 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
inhibition light-emitting diode mycelium pathogen recovery Biology (General) QH301-705.5 |
spellingShingle |
inhibition light-emitting diode mycelium pathogen recovery Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Neringa Rasiukevičiūtė Aušra Brazaitytė Viktorija Vaštakaitė-Kairienė Asta Kupčinskienė Pavelas Duchovskis Giedrė Samuolienė Alma Valiuškaitė The Effect of Monochromatic LED Light Wavelengths and Photoperiods on <i>Botrytis cinerea</i> |
description |
<i>Botrytis cinerea</i> is a ubiquitous necrotrophic pathogen causing grey mould in economically important crops. Light effect in horticulture is undeniable and fungi also react to light. Selected specific light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and photoperiods can be used for fungal pathogen inhibition. This study aimed to evaluate how LED light wavelengths and photoperiods affect the growth parameters of <i>B. cinerea</i>. The morphological (mycelium appearance, sclerotia distribution) and phenotypic (conidia presence and size, mycelium growth rate, recovery) characteristics of the fungal pathogen <i>B. cinerea</i> were evaluated under royal blue 455 nm, blue 470 nm, cyan 505 nm, yellow 590 nm, and red 627 nm LED lights at various photoperiods (4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 h). The results revealed that the light conditions and photoperiods influenced the <i>B. cinerea</i> morphological and phenotypic characteristics. Overall, the highest <i>B. cinerea</i> inhibition was under yellow (590 nm) LED light at 4 and 8 h photoperiods. Conidia did not form under blue 455 nm at 8, 16, 20, and 24 h photoperiods. Therefore, it can be assumed that the phenotypic and morphological features of <i>B. cinerea</i> depend on the specific photoperiod and LED light wavelength. The results allowed an exploration of original research approaches, raised new scientific questions for further investigation, and suggested new green plant protection solutions. |
format |
article |
author |
Neringa Rasiukevičiūtė Aušra Brazaitytė Viktorija Vaštakaitė-Kairienė Asta Kupčinskienė Pavelas Duchovskis Giedrė Samuolienė Alma Valiuškaitė |
author_facet |
Neringa Rasiukevičiūtė Aušra Brazaitytė Viktorija Vaštakaitė-Kairienė Asta Kupčinskienė Pavelas Duchovskis Giedrė Samuolienė Alma Valiuškaitė |
author_sort |
Neringa Rasiukevičiūtė |
title |
The Effect of Monochromatic LED Light Wavelengths and Photoperiods on <i>Botrytis cinerea</i> |
title_short |
The Effect of Monochromatic LED Light Wavelengths and Photoperiods on <i>Botrytis cinerea</i> |
title_full |
The Effect of Monochromatic LED Light Wavelengths and Photoperiods on <i>Botrytis cinerea</i> |
title_fullStr |
The Effect of Monochromatic LED Light Wavelengths and Photoperiods on <i>Botrytis cinerea</i> |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Effect of Monochromatic LED Light Wavelengths and Photoperiods on <i>Botrytis cinerea</i> |
title_sort |
effect of monochromatic led light wavelengths and photoperiods on <i>botrytis cinerea</i> |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/83feb2f733cc4f1299988556a135d058 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT neringarasiukeviciute theeffectofmonochromaticledlightwavelengthsandphotoperiodsonibotrytiscinereai AT ausrabrazaityte theeffectofmonochromaticledlightwavelengthsandphotoperiodsonibotrytiscinereai AT viktorijavastakaitekairiene theeffectofmonochromaticledlightwavelengthsandphotoperiodsonibotrytiscinereai AT astakupcinskiene theeffectofmonochromaticledlightwavelengthsandphotoperiodsonibotrytiscinereai AT pavelasduchovskis theeffectofmonochromaticledlightwavelengthsandphotoperiodsonibotrytiscinereai AT giedresamuoliene theeffectofmonochromaticledlightwavelengthsandphotoperiodsonibotrytiscinereai AT almavaliuskaite theeffectofmonochromaticledlightwavelengthsandphotoperiodsonibotrytiscinereai AT neringarasiukeviciute effectofmonochromaticledlightwavelengthsandphotoperiodsonibotrytiscinereai AT ausrabrazaityte effectofmonochromaticledlightwavelengthsandphotoperiodsonibotrytiscinereai AT viktorijavastakaitekairiene effectofmonochromaticledlightwavelengthsandphotoperiodsonibotrytiscinereai AT astakupcinskiene effectofmonochromaticledlightwavelengthsandphotoperiodsonibotrytiscinereai AT pavelasduchovskis effectofmonochromaticledlightwavelengthsandphotoperiodsonibotrytiscinereai AT giedresamuoliene effectofmonochromaticledlightwavelengthsandphotoperiodsonibotrytiscinereai AT almavaliuskaite effectofmonochromaticledlightwavelengthsandphotoperiodsonibotrytiscinereai |
_version_ |
1718411626431905792 |