The Effect of Monochromatic LED Light Wavelengths and Photoperiods on <i>Botrytis cinerea</i>

<i>Botrytis cinerea</i> is a ubiquitous necrotrophic pathogen causing grey mould in economically important crops. Light effect in horticulture is undeniable and fungi also react to light. Selected specific light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and photoperiods can be used for fungal pathogen inhi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neringa Rasiukevičiūtė, Aušra Brazaitytė, Viktorija Vaštakaitė-Kairienė, Asta Kupčinskienė, Pavelas Duchovskis, Giedrė Samuolienė, Alma Valiuškaitė
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/83feb2f733cc4f1299988556a135d058
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:83feb2f733cc4f1299988556a135d058
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:83feb2f733cc4f1299988556a135d0582021-11-25T18:06:17ZThe Effect of Monochromatic LED Light Wavelengths and Photoperiods on <i>Botrytis cinerea</i>10.3390/jof71109702309-608Xhttps://doaj.org/article/83feb2f733cc4f1299988556a135d0582021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2309-608X/7/11/970https://doaj.org/toc/2309-608X<i>Botrytis cinerea</i> is a ubiquitous necrotrophic pathogen causing grey mould in economically important crops. Light effect in horticulture is undeniable and fungi also react to light. Selected specific light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and photoperiods can be used for fungal pathogen inhibition. This study aimed to evaluate how LED light wavelengths and photoperiods affect the growth parameters of <i>B. cinerea</i>. The morphological (mycelium appearance, sclerotia distribution) and phenotypic (conidia presence and size, mycelium growth rate, recovery) characteristics of the fungal pathogen <i>B. cinerea</i> were evaluated under royal blue 455 nm, blue 470 nm, cyan 505 nm, yellow 590 nm, and red 627 nm LED lights at various photoperiods (4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 h). The results revealed that the light conditions and photoperiods influenced the <i>B. cinerea</i> morphological and phenotypic characteristics. Overall, the highest <i>B. cinerea</i> inhibition was under yellow (590 nm) LED light at 4 and 8 h photoperiods. Conidia did not form under blue 455 nm at 8, 16, 20, and 24 h photoperiods. Therefore, it can be assumed that the phenotypic and morphological features of <i>B. cinerea</i> depend on the specific photoperiod and LED light wavelength. The results allowed an exploration of original research approaches, raised new scientific questions for further investigation, and suggested new green plant protection solutions.Neringa RasiukevičiūtėAušra BrazaitytėViktorija Vaštakaitė-KairienėAsta KupčinskienėPavelas DuchovskisGiedrė SamuolienėAlma ValiuškaitėMDPI AGarticleinhibitionlight-emitting diodemyceliumpathogenrecoveryBiology (General)QH301-705.5ENJournal of Fungi, Vol 7, Iss 970, p 970 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic inhibition
light-emitting diode
mycelium
pathogen
recovery
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
spellingShingle inhibition
light-emitting diode
mycelium
pathogen
recovery
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Neringa Rasiukevičiūtė
Aušra Brazaitytė
Viktorija Vaštakaitė-Kairienė
Asta Kupčinskienė
Pavelas Duchovskis
Giedrė Samuolienė
Alma Valiuškaitė
The Effect of Monochromatic LED Light Wavelengths and Photoperiods on <i>Botrytis cinerea</i>
description <i>Botrytis cinerea</i> is a ubiquitous necrotrophic pathogen causing grey mould in economically important crops. Light effect in horticulture is undeniable and fungi also react to light. Selected specific light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and photoperiods can be used for fungal pathogen inhibition. This study aimed to evaluate how LED light wavelengths and photoperiods affect the growth parameters of <i>B. cinerea</i>. The morphological (mycelium appearance, sclerotia distribution) and phenotypic (conidia presence and size, mycelium growth rate, recovery) characteristics of the fungal pathogen <i>B. cinerea</i> were evaluated under royal blue 455 nm, blue 470 nm, cyan 505 nm, yellow 590 nm, and red 627 nm LED lights at various photoperiods (4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 h). The results revealed that the light conditions and photoperiods influenced the <i>B. cinerea</i> morphological and phenotypic characteristics. Overall, the highest <i>B. cinerea</i> inhibition was under yellow (590 nm) LED light at 4 and 8 h photoperiods. Conidia did not form under blue 455 nm at 8, 16, 20, and 24 h photoperiods. Therefore, it can be assumed that the phenotypic and morphological features of <i>B. cinerea</i> depend on the specific photoperiod and LED light wavelength. The results allowed an exploration of original research approaches, raised new scientific questions for further investigation, and suggested new green plant protection solutions.
format article
author Neringa Rasiukevičiūtė
Aušra Brazaitytė
Viktorija Vaštakaitė-Kairienė
Asta Kupčinskienė
Pavelas Duchovskis
Giedrė Samuolienė
Alma Valiuškaitė
author_facet Neringa Rasiukevičiūtė
Aušra Brazaitytė
Viktorija Vaštakaitė-Kairienė
Asta Kupčinskienė
Pavelas Duchovskis
Giedrė Samuolienė
Alma Valiuškaitė
author_sort Neringa Rasiukevičiūtė
title The Effect of Monochromatic LED Light Wavelengths and Photoperiods on <i>Botrytis cinerea</i>
title_short The Effect of Monochromatic LED Light Wavelengths and Photoperiods on <i>Botrytis cinerea</i>
title_full The Effect of Monochromatic LED Light Wavelengths and Photoperiods on <i>Botrytis cinerea</i>
title_fullStr The Effect of Monochromatic LED Light Wavelengths and Photoperiods on <i>Botrytis cinerea</i>
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Monochromatic LED Light Wavelengths and Photoperiods on <i>Botrytis cinerea</i>
title_sort effect of monochromatic led light wavelengths and photoperiods on <i>botrytis cinerea</i>
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/83feb2f733cc4f1299988556a135d058
work_keys_str_mv AT neringarasiukeviciute theeffectofmonochromaticledlightwavelengthsandphotoperiodsonibotrytiscinereai
AT ausrabrazaityte theeffectofmonochromaticledlightwavelengthsandphotoperiodsonibotrytiscinereai
AT viktorijavastakaitekairiene theeffectofmonochromaticledlightwavelengthsandphotoperiodsonibotrytiscinereai
AT astakupcinskiene theeffectofmonochromaticledlightwavelengthsandphotoperiodsonibotrytiscinereai
AT pavelasduchovskis theeffectofmonochromaticledlightwavelengthsandphotoperiodsonibotrytiscinereai
AT giedresamuoliene theeffectofmonochromaticledlightwavelengthsandphotoperiodsonibotrytiscinereai
AT almavaliuskaite theeffectofmonochromaticledlightwavelengthsandphotoperiodsonibotrytiscinereai
AT neringarasiukeviciute effectofmonochromaticledlightwavelengthsandphotoperiodsonibotrytiscinereai
AT ausrabrazaityte effectofmonochromaticledlightwavelengthsandphotoperiodsonibotrytiscinereai
AT viktorijavastakaitekairiene effectofmonochromaticledlightwavelengthsandphotoperiodsonibotrytiscinereai
AT astakupcinskiene effectofmonochromaticledlightwavelengthsandphotoperiodsonibotrytiscinereai
AT pavelasduchovskis effectofmonochromaticledlightwavelengthsandphotoperiodsonibotrytiscinereai
AT giedresamuoliene effectofmonochromaticledlightwavelengthsandphotoperiodsonibotrytiscinereai
AT almavaliuskaite effectofmonochromaticledlightwavelengthsandphotoperiodsonibotrytiscinereai
_version_ 1718411626431905792