Evidence for Sonority-Driven Stress

We argue that there is no adequate evidence for ‘sonority-driven stress’, building on Shih (2018a,b), and disagreeing with Kenstowicz (1997), de Lacy (2002a, 2004, 2006), and others. More precisely, we argue that there is no phonological mechanism that induces metrical structure to deviate from its...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shu-hao Shih, Paul de Lacy
Formato: article
Lenguaje:CA
EN
Publicado: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/841959a3eea04358a42a9e6303acfd38
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:841959a3eea04358a42a9e6303acfd38
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:841959a3eea04358a42a9e6303acfd382021-11-27T10:46:41ZEvidence for Sonority-Driven Stress10.5565/rev/catjl.2561695-68852014-9719https://doaj.org/article/841959a3eea04358a42a9e6303acfd382019-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://revistes.uab.cat/catJL/article/view/256https://doaj.org/toc/1695-6885https://doaj.org/toc/2014-9719We argue that there is no adequate evidence for ‘sonority-driven stress’, building on Shih (2018a,b), and disagreeing with Kenstowicz (1997), de Lacy (2002a, 2004, 2006), and others. More precisely, we argue that there is no phonological mechanism that induces metrical structure to deviate from its default position for reasons that involve the direct interaction of segmental sonority and foot form. After reviewing the history of sonority-driven stress theory, we identify two broad issues with extant evidence: the lack of methodological reliability, and misattribution of cause. We argue that impressionistic descriptions of sonority-driven stress are not reliable, in the technical sense of evidentiary validity. We further argue that apparent sonority-sensitivity in foot form is a side-effect of either allophony or minor syllable behavior.Shu-hao ShihPaul de LacyUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelonaarticlephonologymetrical structuresonority-driven stresssonoritystressevidencePhilology. LinguisticsP1-1091CAENCatalan Journal of Linguistics, Vol 18 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language CA
EN
topic phonology
metrical structure
sonority-driven stress
sonority
stress
evidence
Philology. Linguistics
P1-1091
spellingShingle phonology
metrical structure
sonority-driven stress
sonority
stress
evidence
Philology. Linguistics
P1-1091
Shu-hao Shih
Paul de Lacy
Evidence for Sonority-Driven Stress
description We argue that there is no adequate evidence for ‘sonority-driven stress’, building on Shih (2018a,b), and disagreeing with Kenstowicz (1997), de Lacy (2002a, 2004, 2006), and others. More precisely, we argue that there is no phonological mechanism that induces metrical structure to deviate from its default position for reasons that involve the direct interaction of segmental sonority and foot form. After reviewing the history of sonority-driven stress theory, we identify two broad issues with extant evidence: the lack of methodological reliability, and misattribution of cause. We argue that impressionistic descriptions of sonority-driven stress are not reliable, in the technical sense of evidentiary validity. We further argue that apparent sonority-sensitivity in foot form is a side-effect of either allophony or minor syllable behavior.
format article
author Shu-hao Shih
Paul de Lacy
author_facet Shu-hao Shih
Paul de Lacy
author_sort Shu-hao Shih
title Evidence for Sonority-Driven Stress
title_short Evidence for Sonority-Driven Stress
title_full Evidence for Sonority-Driven Stress
title_fullStr Evidence for Sonority-Driven Stress
title_full_unstemmed Evidence for Sonority-Driven Stress
title_sort evidence for sonority-driven stress
publisher Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/841959a3eea04358a42a9e6303acfd38
work_keys_str_mv AT shuhaoshih evidenceforsonoritydrivenstress
AT pauldelacy evidenceforsonoritydrivenstress
_version_ 1718409057251885056