The Atomic Structure of the Phage Tuc2009 Baseplate Tripod Suggests that Host Recognition Involves Two Different Carbohydrate Binding Modules

ABSTRACT The Gram-positive bacterium Lactococcus lactis, used for the production of cheeses and other fermented dairy products, falls victim frequently to fortuitous infection by tailed phages. The accompanying risk of dairy fermentation failures in industrial facilities has prompted in-depth invest...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pierre Legrand, Barry Collins, Stéphanie Blangy, James Murphy, Silvia Spinelli, Carlos Gutierrez, Nicolas Richet, Christine Kellenberger, Aline Desmyter, Jennifer Mahony, Douwe van Sinderen, Christian Cambillau
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8429fccd192f426da0b7fa75f64a3e32
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8429fccd192f426da0b7fa75f64a3e32
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8429fccd192f426da0b7fa75f64a3e322021-11-15T15:49:40ZThe Atomic Structure of the Phage Tuc2009 Baseplate Tripod Suggests that Host Recognition Involves Two Different Carbohydrate Binding Modules10.1128/mBio.01781-152150-7511https://doaj.org/article/8429fccd192f426da0b7fa75f64a3e322016-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/mBio.01781-15https://doaj.org/toc/2150-7511ABSTRACT The Gram-positive bacterium Lactococcus lactis, used for the production of cheeses and other fermented dairy products, falls victim frequently to fortuitous infection by tailed phages. The accompanying risk of dairy fermentation failures in industrial facilities has prompted in-depth investigations of these phages. Lactococcal phage Tuc2009 possesses extensive genomic homology to phage TP901-1. However, striking differences in the baseplate-encoding genes stimulated our interest in solving the structure of this host’s adhesion device. We report here the X-ray structures of phage Tuc2009 receptor binding protein (RBP) and of a “tripod” assembly of three baseplate components, BppU, BppA, and BppL (the RBP). These structures made it possible to generate a realistic atomic model of the complete Tuc2009 baseplate that consists of an 84-protein complex: 18 BppU, 12 BppA, and 54 BppL proteins. The RBP head domain possesses a different fold than those of phages p2, TP901-1, and 1358, while the so-called “stem” and “neck” domains share structural features with their equivalents in phage TP901-1. The BppA module interacts strongly with the BppU N-terminal domain. Unlike other characterized lactococcal phages, Tuc2009 baseplate harbors two different carbohydrate recognition sites: one in the bona fide RBP head domain and the other in BppA. These findings represent a major step forward in deciphering the molecular mechanism by which Tuc2009 recognizes its saccharidic receptor(s) on its host. IMPORTANCE Understanding how siphophages infect Lactococcus lactis is of commercial importance as they cause milk fermentation failures in the dairy industry. In addition, such knowledge is crucial in a general sense in order to understand how viruses recognize their host through protein-glycan interactions. We report here the lactococcal phage Tuc2009 receptor binding protein (RBP) structure as well as that of its baseplate. The RBP head domain has a different fold than those of phages p2, TP901-1, and 1358, while the so-called “stem” and “neck” share the fold characteristics also found in the equivalent baseplate proteins of phage TP901-1. The baseplate structure contains, in contrast to other characterized lactococcal phages, two different carbohydrate binding modules that may bind different motifs of the host’s surface polysaccharide.Pierre LegrandBarry CollinsStéphanie BlangyJames MurphySilvia SpinelliCarlos GutierrezNicolas RichetChristine KellenbergerAline DesmyterJennifer MahonyDouwe van SinderenChristian CambillauAmerican Society for MicrobiologyarticleMicrobiologyQR1-502ENmBio, Vol 7, Iss 1 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Microbiology
QR1-502
spellingShingle Microbiology
QR1-502
Pierre Legrand
Barry Collins
Stéphanie Blangy
James Murphy
Silvia Spinelli
Carlos Gutierrez
Nicolas Richet
Christine Kellenberger
Aline Desmyter
Jennifer Mahony
Douwe van Sinderen
Christian Cambillau
The Atomic Structure of the Phage Tuc2009 Baseplate Tripod Suggests that Host Recognition Involves Two Different Carbohydrate Binding Modules
description ABSTRACT The Gram-positive bacterium Lactococcus lactis, used for the production of cheeses and other fermented dairy products, falls victim frequently to fortuitous infection by tailed phages. The accompanying risk of dairy fermentation failures in industrial facilities has prompted in-depth investigations of these phages. Lactococcal phage Tuc2009 possesses extensive genomic homology to phage TP901-1. However, striking differences in the baseplate-encoding genes stimulated our interest in solving the structure of this host’s adhesion device. We report here the X-ray structures of phage Tuc2009 receptor binding protein (RBP) and of a “tripod” assembly of three baseplate components, BppU, BppA, and BppL (the RBP). These structures made it possible to generate a realistic atomic model of the complete Tuc2009 baseplate that consists of an 84-protein complex: 18 BppU, 12 BppA, and 54 BppL proteins. The RBP head domain possesses a different fold than those of phages p2, TP901-1, and 1358, while the so-called “stem” and “neck” domains share structural features with their equivalents in phage TP901-1. The BppA module interacts strongly with the BppU N-terminal domain. Unlike other characterized lactococcal phages, Tuc2009 baseplate harbors two different carbohydrate recognition sites: one in the bona fide RBP head domain and the other in BppA. These findings represent a major step forward in deciphering the molecular mechanism by which Tuc2009 recognizes its saccharidic receptor(s) on its host. IMPORTANCE Understanding how siphophages infect Lactococcus lactis is of commercial importance as they cause milk fermentation failures in the dairy industry. In addition, such knowledge is crucial in a general sense in order to understand how viruses recognize their host through protein-glycan interactions. We report here the lactococcal phage Tuc2009 receptor binding protein (RBP) structure as well as that of its baseplate. The RBP head domain has a different fold than those of phages p2, TP901-1, and 1358, while the so-called “stem” and “neck” share the fold characteristics also found in the equivalent baseplate proteins of phage TP901-1. The baseplate structure contains, in contrast to other characterized lactococcal phages, two different carbohydrate binding modules that may bind different motifs of the host’s surface polysaccharide.
format article
author Pierre Legrand
Barry Collins
Stéphanie Blangy
James Murphy
Silvia Spinelli
Carlos Gutierrez
Nicolas Richet
Christine Kellenberger
Aline Desmyter
Jennifer Mahony
Douwe van Sinderen
Christian Cambillau
author_facet Pierre Legrand
Barry Collins
Stéphanie Blangy
James Murphy
Silvia Spinelli
Carlos Gutierrez
Nicolas Richet
Christine Kellenberger
Aline Desmyter
Jennifer Mahony
Douwe van Sinderen
Christian Cambillau
author_sort Pierre Legrand
title The Atomic Structure of the Phage Tuc2009 Baseplate Tripod Suggests that Host Recognition Involves Two Different Carbohydrate Binding Modules
title_short The Atomic Structure of the Phage Tuc2009 Baseplate Tripod Suggests that Host Recognition Involves Two Different Carbohydrate Binding Modules
title_full The Atomic Structure of the Phage Tuc2009 Baseplate Tripod Suggests that Host Recognition Involves Two Different Carbohydrate Binding Modules
title_fullStr The Atomic Structure of the Phage Tuc2009 Baseplate Tripod Suggests that Host Recognition Involves Two Different Carbohydrate Binding Modules
title_full_unstemmed The Atomic Structure of the Phage Tuc2009 Baseplate Tripod Suggests that Host Recognition Involves Two Different Carbohydrate Binding Modules
title_sort atomic structure of the phage tuc2009 baseplate tripod suggests that host recognition involves two different carbohydrate binding modules
publisher American Society for Microbiology
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/8429fccd192f426da0b7fa75f64a3e32
work_keys_str_mv AT pierrelegrand theatomicstructureofthephagetuc2009baseplatetripodsuggeststhathostrecognitioninvolvestwodifferentcarbohydratebindingmodules
AT barrycollins theatomicstructureofthephagetuc2009baseplatetripodsuggeststhathostrecognitioninvolvestwodifferentcarbohydratebindingmodules
AT stephanieblangy theatomicstructureofthephagetuc2009baseplatetripodsuggeststhathostrecognitioninvolvestwodifferentcarbohydratebindingmodules
AT jamesmurphy theatomicstructureofthephagetuc2009baseplatetripodsuggeststhathostrecognitioninvolvestwodifferentcarbohydratebindingmodules
AT silviaspinelli theatomicstructureofthephagetuc2009baseplatetripodsuggeststhathostrecognitioninvolvestwodifferentcarbohydratebindingmodules
AT carlosgutierrez theatomicstructureofthephagetuc2009baseplatetripodsuggeststhathostrecognitioninvolvestwodifferentcarbohydratebindingmodules
AT nicolasrichet theatomicstructureofthephagetuc2009baseplatetripodsuggeststhathostrecognitioninvolvestwodifferentcarbohydratebindingmodules
AT christinekellenberger theatomicstructureofthephagetuc2009baseplatetripodsuggeststhathostrecognitioninvolvestwodifferentcarbohydratebindingmodules
AT alinedesmyter theatomicstructureofthephagetuc2009baseplatetripodsuggeststhathostrecognitioninvolvestwodifferentcarbohydratebindingmodules
AT jennifermahony theatomicstructureofthephagetuc2009baseplatetripodsuggeststhathostrecognitioninvolvestwodifferentcarbohydratebindingmodules
AT douwevansinderen theatomicstructureofthephagetuc2009baseplatetripodsuggeststhathostrecognitioninvolvestwodifferentcarbohydratebindingmodules
AT christiancambillau theatomicstructureofthephagetuc2009baseplatetripodsuggeststhathostrecognitioninvolvestwodifferentcarbohydratebindingmodules
AT pierrelegrand atomicstructureofthephagetuc2009baseplatetripodsuggeststhathostrecognitioninvolvestwodifferentcarbohydratebindingmodules
AT barrycollins atomicstructureofthephagetuc2009baseplatetripodsuggeststhathostrecognitioninvolvestwodifferentcarbohydratebindingmodules
AT stephanieblangy atomicstructureofthephagetuc2009baseplatetripodsuggeststhathostrecognitioninvolvestwodifferentcarbohydratebindingmodules
AT jamesmurphy atomicstructureofthephagetuc2009baseplatetripodsuggeststhathostrecognitioninvolvestwodifferentcarbohydratebindingmodules
AT silviaspinelli atomicstructureofthephagetuc2009baseplatetripodsuggeststhathostrecognitioninvolvestwodifferentcarbohydratebindingmodules
AT carlosgutierrez atomicstructureofthephagetuc2009baseplatetripodsuggeststhathostrecognitioninvolvestwodifferentcarbohydratebindingmodules
AT nicolasrichet atomicstructureofthephagetuc2009baseplatetripodsuggeststhathostrecognitioninvolvestwodifferentcarbohydratebindingmodules
AT christinekellenberger atomicstructureofthephagetuc2009baseplatetripodsuggeststhathostrecognitioninvolvestwodifferentcarbohydratebindingmodules
AT alinedesmyter atomicstructureofthephagetuc2009baseplatetripodsuggeststhathostrecognitioninvolvestwodifferentcarbohydratebindingmodules
AT jennifermahony atomicstructureofthephagetuc2009baseplatetripodsuggeststhathostrecognitioninvolvestwodifferentcarbohydratebindingmodules
AT douwevansinderen atomicstructureofthephagetuc2009baseplatetripodsuggeststhathostrecognitioninvolvestwodifferentcarbohydratebindingmodules
AT christiancambillau atomicstructureofthephagetuc2009baseplatetripodsuggeststhathostrecognitioninvolvestwodifferentcarbohydratebindingmodules
_version_ 1718427468201721856