The cognitive effects of a promised bonus do not depend on dopamine synthesis capacity

Abstract Reward motivation is known to enhance cognitive control. However, detrimental effects have also been observed, which have been attributed to overdosing of already high baseline dopamine levels by further dopamine increases elicited by reward cues. Aarts et al. (2014) indeed demonstrated, in...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lieke Hofmans, Ruben van den Bosch, Jessica I. Määttä, Robbert-Jan Verkes, Esther Aarts, Roshan Cools
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2020
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/84478ea534cb4ceda7743298b93dae7e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:84478ea534cb4ceda7743298b93dae7e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:84478ea534cb4ceda7743298b93dae7e2021-12-02T18:37:07ZThe cognitive effects of a promised bonus do not depend on dopamine synthesis capacity10.1038/s41598-020-72329-42045-2322https://doaj.org/article/84478ea534cb4ceda7743298b93dae7e2020-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72329-4https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Reward motivation is known to enhance cognitive control. However, detrimental effects have also been observed, which have been attributed to overdosing of already high baseline dopamine levels by further dopamine increases elicited by reward cues. Aarts et al. (2014) indeed demonstrated, in 14 individuals, that reward effects depended on striatal dopamine synthesis capacity, measured with [18F]FMT-PET: promised reward improved Stroop control in low-dopamine individuals, while impairing it in high-dopamine individuals. Here, we aimed to assess this same effect in 44 new participants, who had previously undergone an [18F]DOPA-PET scan to quantify dopamine synthesis capacity. This sample performed the exact same rewarded Stroop paradigm as in the prior study. However, we did not find any correlation between reward effects on cognitive control and striatal dopamine synthesis capacity. Critical differences between the radiotracers [18F]DOPA and [18F]FMT are discussed, as the discrepancy between the current and our previous findings might reflect the use of the potentially less sensitive [18F]DOPA radiotracer in the current study.Lieke HofmansRuben van den BoschJessica I. MäättäRobbert-Jan VerkesEsther AartsRoshan CoolsNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Lieke Hofmans
Ruben van den Bosch
Jessica I. Määttä
Robbert-Jan Verkes
Esther Aarts
Roshan Cools
The cognitive effects of a promised bonus do not depend on dopamine synthesis capacity
description Abstract Reward motivation is known to enhance cognitive control. However, detrimental effects have also been observed, which have been attributed to overdosing of already high baseline dopamine levels by further dopamine increases elicited by reward cues. Aarts et al. (2014) indeed demonstrated, in 14 individuals, that reward effects depended on striatal dopamine synthesis capacity, measured with [18F]FMT-PET: promised reward improved Stroop control in low-dopamine individuals, while impairing it in high-dopamine individuals. Here, we aimed to assess this same effect in 44 new participants, who had previously undergone an [18F]DOPA-PET scan to quantify dopamine synthesis capacity. This sample performed the exact same rewarded Stroop paradigm as in the prior study. However, we did not find any correlation between reward effects on cognitive control and striatal dopamine synthesis capacity. Critical differences between the radiotracers [18F]DOPA and [18F]FMT are discussed, as the discrepancy between the current and our previous findings might reflect the use of the potentially less sensitive [18F]DOPA radiotracer in the current study.
format article
author Lieke Hofmans
Ruben van den Bosch
Jessica I. Määttä
Robbert-Jan Verkes
Esther Aarts
Roshan Cools
author_facet Lieke Hofmans
Ruben van den Bosch
Jessica I. Määttä
Robbert-Jan Verkes
Esther Aarts
Roshan Cools
author_sort Lieke Hofmans
title The cognitive effects of a promised bonus do not depend on dopamine synthesis capacity
title_short The cognitive effects of a promised bonus do not depend on dopamine synthesis capacity
title_full The cognitive effects of a promised bonus do not depend on dopamine synthesis capacity
title_fullStr The cognitive effects of a promised bonus do not depend on dopamine synthesis capacity
title_full_unstemmed The cognitive effects of a promised bonus do not depend on dopamine synthesis capacity
title_sort cognitive effects of a promised bonus do not depend on dopamine synthesis capacity
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/84478ea534cb4ceda7743298b93dae7e
work_keys_str_mv AT liekehofmans thecognitiveeffectsofapromisedbonusdonotdependondopaminesynthesiscapacity
AT rubenvandenbosch thecognitiveeffectsofapromisedbonusdonotdependondopaminesynthesiscapacity
AT jessicaimaatta thecognitiveeffectsofapromisedbonusdonotdependondopaminesynthesiscapacity
AT robbertjanverkes thecognitiveeffectsofapromisedbonusdonotdependondopaminesynthesiscapacity
AT estheraarts thecognitiveeffectsofapromisedbonusdonotdependondopaminesynthesiscapacity
AT roshancools thecognitiveeffectsofapromisedbonusdonotdependondopaminesynthesiscapacity
AT liekehofmans cognitiveeffectsofapromisedbonusdonotdependondopaminesynthesiscapacity
AT rubenvandenbosch cognitiveeffectsofapromisedbonusdonotdependondopaminesynthesiscapacity
AT jessicaimaatta cognitiveeffectsofapromisedbonusdonotdependondopaminesynthesiscapacity
AT robbertjanverkes cognitiveeffectsofapromisedbonusdonotdependondopaminesynthesiscapacity
AT estheraarts cognitiveeffectsofapromisedbonusdonotdependondopaminesynthesiscapacity
AT roshancools cognitiveeffectsofapromisedbonusdonotdependondopaminesynthesiscapacity
_version_ 1718377807891922944