Reciprocity? International Preceptors’ Perceptions of Global Health Elective Learners at African Sites

Background: Short-term global health electives (STGHEs) have become increasingly common, with evidence showing educational and clinical benefits for short-term learners (STLs). Despite increased recognition that STGHEs should be mutually beneficial for host sites and STLs, evidence demonstrating the...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elizabeth M. Keating, Heather Haq, Chris A. Rees, Padma Swamy, Teri L. Turner, Stephanie Marton, Jill Sanders, Edith Q. Mohapi, Peter N. Kazembe, Gordon E. Schutze
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8476ea65abb54757af3c1e18aacfffb6
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8476ea65abb54757af3c1e18aacfffb6
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8476ea65abb54757af3c1e18aacfffb62021-12-02T11:08:37ZReciprocity? International Preceptors’ Perceptions of Global Health Elective Learners at African Sites2214-999610.5334/aogh.2342https://doaj.org/article/8476ea65abb54757af3c1e18aacfffb62019-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://annalsofglobalhealth.org/articles/2342https://doaj.org/toc/2214-9996Background: Short-term global health electives (STGHEs) have become increasingly common, with evidence showing educational and clinical benefits for short-term learners (STLs). Despite increased recognition that STGHEs should be mutually beneficial for host sites and STLs, evidence demonstrating the impact on international host preceptors is lacking. Objectives: To understand international host preceptors’ perceptions regarding benefits and burdens of hosting STLs. Methods: Focus group discussions with a convenience sample of 10 of 18 eligible preceptors were conducted at pediatric STGHE sites in Malawi and Lesotho. Qualitative content analysis was performed to identify themes using a deductive-inductive approach. Findings: Common themes regarding benefits to preceptors included increased knowledge and resources for learning from STLs, broadened differential diagnoses, and the satisfaction of teaching. Regarding burdens, preceptors perceived that supervising STLs decreases efficiency. Preceptors identified the burden of having to intervene in instances that could lead to patient harm. Some preceptors perceived that STLs under-valued preceptors’ clinical decision-making in resource-limited contexts. Conclusions: Our findings emphasize the need for institutions to identify mutuality of benefits between STLs and host sites when developing STGHEs. Host preceptors identified robust pre-departure training for STLs, lengthened duration of STGHEs, and formal preceptor orientation as ways to enhance mutuality of benefits.Elizabeth M. KeatingHeather HaqChris A. ReesPadma SwamyTeri L. TurnerStephanie MartonJill SandersEdith Q. MohapiPeter N. KazembeGordon E. SchutzeUbiquity PressarticleInfectious and parasitic diseasesRC109-216Public aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENAnnals of Global Health, Vol 85, Iss 1 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
spellingShingle Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Elizabeth M. Keating
Heather Haq
Chris A. Rees
Padma Swamy
Teri L. Turner
Stephanie Marton
Jill Sanders
Edith Q. Mohapi
Peter N. Kazembe
Gordon E. Schutze
Reciprocity? International Preceptors’ Perceptions of Global Health Elective Learners at African Sites
description Background: Short-term global health electives (STGHEs) have become increasingly common, with evidence showing educational and clinical benefits for short-term learners (STLs). Despite increased recognition that STGHEs should be mutually beneficial for host sites and STLs, evidence demonstrating the impact on international host preceptors is lacking. Objectives: To understand international host preceptors’ perceptions regarding benefits and burdens of hosting STLs. Methods: Focus group discussions with a convenience sample of 10 of 18 eligible preceptors were conducted at pediatric STGHE sites in Malawi and Lesotho. Qualitative content analysis was performed to identify themes using a deductive-inductive approach. Findings: Common themes regarding benefits to preceptors included increased knowledge and resources for learning from STLs, broadened differential diagnoses, and the satisfaction of teaching. Regarding burdens, preceptors perceived that supervising STLs decreases efficiency. Preceptors identified the burden of having to intervene in instances that could lead to patient harm. Some preceptors perceived that STLs under-valued preceptors’ clinical decision-making in resource-limited contexts. Conclusions: Our findings emphasize the need for institutions to identify mutuality of benefits between STLs and host sites when developing STGHEs. Host preceptors identified robust pre-departure training for STLs, lengthened duration of STGHEs, and formal preceptor orientation as ways to enhance mutuality of benefits.
format article
author Elizabeth M. Keating
Heather Haq
Chris A. Rees
Padma Swamy
Teri L. Turner
Stephanie Marton
Jill Sanders
Edith Q. Mohapi
Peter N. Kazembe
Gordon E. Schutze
author_facet Elizabeth M. Keating
Heather Haq
Chris A. Rees
Padma Swamy
Teri L. Turner
Stephanie Marton
Jill Sanders
Edith Q. Mohapi
Peter N. Kazembe
Gordon E. Schutze
author_sort Elizabeth M. Keating
title Reciprocity? International Preceptors’ Perceptions of Global Health Elective Learners at African Sites
title_short Reciprocity? International Preceptors’ Perceptions of Global Health Elective Learners at African Sites
title_full Reciprocity? International Preceptors’ Perceptions of Global Health Elective Learners at African Sites
title_fullStr Reciprocity? International Preceptors’ Perceptions of Global Health Elective Learners at African Sites
title_full_unstemmed Reciprocity? International Preceptors’ Perceptions of Global Health Elective Learners at African Sites
title_sort reciprocity? international preceptors’ perceptions of global health elective learners at african sites
publisher Ubiquity Press
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/8476ea65abb54757af3c1e18aacfffb6
work_keys_str_mv AT elizabethmkeating reciprocityinternationalpreceptorsperceptionsofglobalhealthelectivelearnersatafricansites
AT heatherhaq reciprocityinternationalpreceptorsperceptionsofglobalhealthelectivelearnersatafricansites
AT chrisarees reciprocityinternationalpreceptorsperceptionsofglobalhealthelectivelearnersatafricansites
AT padmaswamy reciprocityinternationalpreceptorsperceptionsofglobalhealthelectivelearnersatafricansites
AT terilturner reciprocityinternationalpreceptorsperceptionsofglobalhealthelectivelearnersatafricansites
AT stephaniemarton reciprocityinternationalpreceptorsperceptionsofglobalhealthelectivelearnersatafricansites
AT jillsanders reciprocityinternationalpreceptorsperceptionsofglobalhealthelectivelearnersatafricansites
AT edithqmohapi reciprocityinternationalpreceptorsperceptionsofglobalhealthelectivelearnersatafricansites
AT peternkazembe reciprocityinternationalpreceptorsperceptionsofglobalhealthelectivelearnersatafricansites
AT gordoneschutze reciprocityinternationalpreceptorsperceptionsofglobalhealthelectivelearnersatafricansites
_version_ 1718396230889897984