Doppler ultrasound and giant cell arteritis

Ana Marina Suelves1, Enrique España-Gregori1,2, Jose Tembl3, Stephanie Rohrweck1, Jose Maria Millán4, Manuel Díaz-Llopis1,4,51Service of Ophthalmology, La Fe University Hospital, Valencia, Spain; 2Department of Optics, University of Valencia, Valencia, Sp...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ana Marina Suelves, Enrique España-Gregori, Jose Tembl, et al
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/847bf74e69524bfca29064a97a74b048
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:847bf74e69524bfca29064a97a74b048
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:847bf74e69524bfca29064a97a74b0482021-12-02T02:56:49ZDoppler ultrasound and giant cell arteritis1177-54671177-5483https://doaj.org/article/847bf74e69524bfca29064a97a74b0482010-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.dovepress.com/doppler-ultrasound-and-giant-cell-arteritis-a5757https://doaj.org/toc/1177-5467https://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Ana Marina Suelves1, Enrique España-Gregori1,2, Jose Tembl3, Stephanie Rohrweck1, Jose Maria Millán4, Manuel Díaz-Llopis1,4,51Service of Ophthalmology, La Fe University Hospital, Valencia, Spain; 2Department of Optics, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; 3Service of Neurology, La Fe University Hospital, Valencia, Spain; 4CIBERER, Ciber de Enfermedades Raras, Valencia, Spain; 5Faculty of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, SpainObjective: To evaluate the utility of ultrasound in aiding the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA), in monitoring the response to corticotherapy, and in detecting early relapses.Methods: A pilot study, prospective, included 10 patients with suspected GCA. All patients underwent ultrasound examination of both temporal arteries before temporal artery biopsy (TAB), 3 weeks after starting treatment, and 3 months after diagnosis. For this study, the histological findings alone were used to define if patients were suffering from GCA. The findings on ultrasound were compared with the results of biopsy. The best place to perform TAB was observed by ultrasound.Results: All patients with positive biopsy were detected with ultrasound. No false positives were observed on ultrasound. The results presented give a sensibility, specificity, and positive predictive value of 100% for the use of ultrasound in the diagnosis of GCA. Two relapses were detected early by ultrasound during the follow-up.Conclusions: This pilot study suggests that eco-doppler may be a useful tool in diagnosis and clinic follow-up in patients with suspected GCA.Keywords: giant cell arteritis, ultrasound, temporal artery biopsy, optic nerve Ana Marina SuelvesEnrique España-GregoriJose Temblet alDove Medical PressarticleOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol 2010, Iss default, Pp 1383-1384 (2010)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Ana Marina Suelves
Enrique España-Gregori
Jose Tembl
et al
Doppler ultrasound and giant cell arteritis
description Ana Marina Suelves1, Enrique España-Gregori1,2, Jose Tembl3, Stephanie Rohrweck1, Jose Maria Millán4, Manuel Díaz-Llopis1,4,51Service of Ophthalmology, La Fe University Hospital, Valencia, Spain; 2Department of Optics, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; 3Service of Neurology, La Fe University Hospital, Valencia, Spain; 4CIBERER, Ciber de Enfermedades Raras, Valencia, Spain; 5Faculty of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, SpainObjective: To evaluate the utility of ultrasound in aiding the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA), in monitoring the response to corticotherapy, and in detecting early relapses.Methods: A pilot study, prospective, included 10 patients with suspected GCA. All patients underwent ultrasound examination of both temporal arteries before temporal artery biopsy (TAB), 3 weeks after starting treatment, and 3 months after diagnosis. For this study, the histological findings alone were used to define if patients were suffering from GCA. The findings on ultrasound were compared with the results of biopsy. The best place to perform TAB was observed by ultrasound.Results: All patients with positive biopsy were detected with ultrasound. No false positives were observed on ultrasound. The results presented give a sensibility, specificity, and positive predictive value of 100% for the use of ultrasound in the diagnosis of GCA. Two relapses were detected early by ultrasound during the follow-up.Conclusions: This pilot study suggests that eco-doppler may be a useful tool in diagnosis and clinic follow-up in patients with suspected GCA.Keywords: giant cell arteritis, ultrasound, temporal artery biopsy, optic nerve
format article
author Ana Marina Suelves
Enrique España-Gregori
Jose Tembl
et al
author_facet Ana Marina Suelves
Enrique España-Gregori
Jose Tembl
et al
author_sort Ana Marina Suelves
title Doppler ultrasound and giant cell arteritis
title_short Doppler ultrasound and giant cell arteritis
title_full Doppler ultrasound and giant cell arteritis
title_fullStr Doppler ultrasound and giant cell arteritis
title_full_unstemmed Doppler ultrasound and giant cell arteritis
title_sort doppler ultrasound and giant cell arteritis
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2010
url https://doaj.org/article/847bf74e69524bfca29064a97a74b048
work_keys_str_mv AT anamarinasuelves dopplerultrasoundandgiantcellarteritis
AT enriqueespaampntildeagregori dopplerultrasoundandgiantcellarteritis
AT josetembl dopplerultrasoundandgiantcellarteritis
AT etal dopplerultrasoundandgiantcellarteritis
_version_ 1718402053308416000