Semantic similarity in biomedical ontologies.

In recent years, ontologies have become a mainstream topic in biomedical research. When biological entities are described using a common schema, such as an ontology, they can be compared by means of their annotations. This type of comparison is called semantic similarity, since it assesses the degre...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Catia Pesquita, Daniel Faria, André O Falcão, Phillip Lord, Francisco M Couto
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/84a7f00e12144713b8e4373bca187744
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:84a7f00e12144713b8e4373bca187744
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:84a7f00e12144713b8e4373bca1877442021-11-25T05:42:16ZSemantic similarity in biomedical ontologies.1553-734X1553-735810.1371/journal.pcbi.1000443https://doaj.org/article/84a7f00e12144713b8e4373bca1877442009-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/19649320/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1553-734Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/1553-7358In recent years, ontologies have become a mainstream topic in biomedical research. When biological entities are described using a common schema, such as an ontology, they can be compared by means of their annotations. This type of comparison is called semantic similarity, since it assesses the degree of relatedness between two entities by the similarity in meaning of their annotations. The application of semantic similarity to biomedical ontologies is recent; nevertheless, several studies have been published in the last few years describing and evaluating diverse approaches. Semantic similarity has become a valuable tool for validating the results drawn from biomedical studies such as gene clustering, gene expression data analysis, prediction and validation of molecular interactions, and disease gene prioritization. We review semantic similarity measures applied to biomedical ontologies and propose their classification according to the strategies they employ: node-based versus edge-based and pairwise versus groupwise. We also present comparative assessment studies and discuss the implications of their results. We survey the existing implementations of semantic similarity measures, and we describe examples of applications to biomedical research. This will clarify how biomedical researchers can benefit from semantic similarity measures and help them choose the approach most suitable for their studies.Biomedical ontologies are evolving toward increased coverage, formality, and integration, and their use for annotation is increasingly becoming a focus of both effort by biomedical experts and application of automated annotation procedures to create corpora of higher quality and completeness than are currently available. Given that semantic similarity measures are directly dependent on these evolutions, we can expect to see them gaining more relevance and even becoming as essential as sequence similarity is today in biomedical research.Catia PesquitaDaniel FariaAndré O FalcãoPhillip LordFrancisco M CoutoPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleBiology (General)QH301-705.5ENPLoS Computational Biology, Vol 5, Iss 7, p e1000443 (2009)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
spellingShingle Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Catia Pesquita
Daniel Faria
André O Falcão
Phillip Lord
Francisco M Couto
Semantic similarity in biomedical ontologies.
description In recent years, ontologies have become a mainstream topic in biomedical research. When biological entities are described using a common schema, such as an ontology, they can be compared by means of their annotations. This type of comparison is called semantic similarity, since it assesses the degree of relatedness between two entities by the similarity in meaning of their annotations. The application of semantic similarity to biomedical ontologies is recent; nevertheless, several studies have been published in the last few years describing and evaluating diverse approaches. Semantic similarity has become a valuable tool for validating the results drawn from biomedical studies such as gene clustering, gene expression data analysis, prediction and validation of molecular interactions, and disease gene prioritization. We review semantic similarity measures applied to biomedical ontologies and propose their classification according to the strategies they employ: node-based versus edge-based and pairwise versus groupwise. We also present comparative assessment studies and discuss the implications of their results. We survey the existing implementations of semantic similarity measures, and we describe examples of applications to biomedical research. This will clarify how biomedical researchers can benefit from semantic similarity measures and help them choose the approach most suitable for their studies.Biomedical ontologies are evolving toward increased coverage, formality, and integration, and their use for annotation is increasingly becoming a focus of both effort by biomedical experts and application of automated annotation procedures to create corpora of higher quality and completeness than are currently available. Given that semantic similarity measures are directly dependent on these evolutions, we can expect to see them gaining more relevance and even becoming as essential as sequence similarity is today in biomedical research.
format article
author Catia Pesquita
Daniel Faria
André O Falcão
Phillip Lord
Francisco M Couto
author_facet Catia Pesquita
Daniel Faria
André O Falcão
Phillip Lord
Francisco M Couto
author_sort Catia Pesquita
title Semantic similarity in biomedical ontologies.
title_short Semantic similarity in biomedical ontologies.
title_full Semantic similarity in biomedical ontologies.
title_fullStr Semantic similarity in biomedical ontologies.
title_full_unstemmed Semantic similarity in biomedical ontologies.
title_sort semantic similarity in biomedical ontologies.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2009
url https://doaj.org/article/84a7f00e12144713b8e4373bca187744
work_keys_str_mv AT catiapesquita semanticsimilarityinbiomedicalontologies
AT danielfaria semanticsimilarityinbiomedicalontologies
AT andreofalcao semanticsimilarityinbiomedicalontologies
AT philliplord semanticsimilarityinbiomedicalontologies
AT franciscomcouto semanticsimilarityinbiomedicalontologies
_version_ 1718414527161171968