Okrągły stół

The Round Table. Was it worth it? In 1989 Realists were on both sides of the political contention. Realists from the Communist party thought it was necessary to make changes that would prevent the outbreak of social discontent. They also wanted to partly shift the responsibility for the conditio...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Ryszard Terlecki
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN PL
Publicado:	Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing 2013
Materias:	realizm okrągły stół „Solidarność” Law K Political science J
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/84a8d742d5cd4e72912e7bb767579d3a
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:84a8d742d5cd4e72912e7bb767579d3a
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:84a8d742d5cd4e72912e7bb767579d3a2021-11-27T13:16:52ZOkrągły stół10.12797/Politeja.10.2013.25.101733-67162391-6737https://doaj.org/article/84a8d742d5cd4e72912e7bb767579d3a2013-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.akademicka.pl/politeja/article/view/3462https://doaj.org/toc/1733-6716https://doaj.org/toc/2391-6737 The Round Table. Was it worth it? In 1989 Realists were on both sides of the political contention. Realists from the Communist party thought it was necessary to make changes that would prevent the outbreak of social discontent. They also wanted to partly shift the responsibility for the condition of the state onto the opposition. Realists from the Solidarity camp thought the offer of the Communist was acceptable, and that the Solidarity should wait for further developments strengthening itself. Each group had to overcome its inner opponents and eventually a concept of the compromise prevailed. It saved the first group from bearing consequences for the times of dictatorship, and allowed the second group to build up a sovereign, democratic state. However, the victory of the latter turned out to be illusory as Communists settled down within democratic structures, infesting them with pathologies of the their system: corruption, bribery, impunity of secret services, dependency of courts and ideological deviations. Ryszard TerleckiKsiegarnia Akademicka Publishingarticlerealizmokrągły stół„Solidarność”LawKPolitical scienceJENPLPoliteja, Vol 10, Iss 3(25) (2013)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN PL
topic	realizm okrągły stół „Solidarność” Law K Political science J
spellingShingle	realizm okrągły stół „Solidarność” Law K Political science J Ryszard Terlecki Okrągły stół
description	The Round Table. Was it worth it? In 1989 Realists were on both sides of the political contention. Realists from the Communist party thought it was necessary to make changes that would prevent the outbreak of social discontent. They also wanted to partly shift the responsibility for the condition of the state onto the opposition. Realists from the Solidarity camp thought the offer of the Communist was acceptable, and that the Solidarity should wait for further developments strengthening itself. Each group had to overcome its inner opponents and eventually a concept of the compromise prevailed. It saved the first group from bearing consequences for the times of dictatorship, and allowed the second group to build up a sovereign, democratic state. However, the victory of the latter turned out to be illusory as Communists settled down within democratic structures, infesting them with pathologies of the their system: corruption, bribery, impunity of secret services, dependency of courts and ideological deviations.
format	article
author	Ryszard Terlecki
author_facet	Ryszard Terlecki
author_sort	Ryszard Terlecki
title	Okrągły stół
title_short	Okrągły stół
title_full	Okrągły stół
title_fullStr	Okrągły stół
title_full_unstemmed	Okrągły stół
title_sort	okrągły stół
publisher	Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing
publishDate	2013
url	https://doaj.org/article/84a8d742d5cd4e72912e7bb767579d3a
work_keys_str_mv	AT ryszardterlecki okragłystoł
_version_	1718408570583646208

Okrągły stół

Ejemplares similares