Actionable health app evaluation: translating expert frameworks into objective metrics

Abstract As use and availability of mobile health apps have increased, so too has the need for a thorough, accessible framework for app evaluation. The American Psychiatric Association’s app evaluation model has emerged as a way to critically assess an app by considering accessibility, privacy and s...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sarah Lagan, Patrick Aquino, Margaret R. Emerson, Karen Fortuna, Robert Walker, John Torous
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/84c81d972bea497c963e26ad8c7d76b3
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:84c81d972bea497c963e26ad8c7d76b3
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:84c81d972bea497c963e26ad8c7d76b32021-12-02T16:31:00ZActionable health app evaluation: translating expert frameworks into objective metrics10.1038/s41746-020-00312-42398-6352https://doaj.org/article/84c81d972bea497c963e26ad8c7d76b32020-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-00312-4https://doaj.org/toc/2398-6352Abstract As use and availability of mobile health apps have increased, so too has the need for a thorough, accessible framework for app evaluation. The American Psychiatric Association’s app evaluation model has emerged as a way to critically assess an app by considering accessibility, privacy and security, clinical foundation, engagement, and interoperability; however, there is no centralized database where users can view how various health apps perform when assessed via the APA model. In this perspective, we propose and outline our effort to translate the APA’s model for the evaluation of health apps into a set of objective metrics that can be published online, making the framework actionable and accessible to a broad audience. The questions from the APA model were operationalized into 105 objective questions that are either binary or numeric. These questions serve as the foundation of an online database, where app evaluation consists of answering these 105 questions and can be crowdsourced. While the database has yet to be published and crowdsourced, initial internal testing demonstrated excellent interrater reliability. The database proposed here introduces a public and interactive approach to data collection that is guided by the APA model. The published product enables users to sort through the many mobile health apps and filter them according to individual preferences and priorities, making the ever-growing health app market more navigable.Sarah LaganPatrick AquinoMargaret R. EmersonKaren FortunaRobert WalkerJohn TorousNature PortfolioarticleComputer applications to medicine. Medical informaticsR858-859.7ENnpj Digital Medicine, Vol 3, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics
R858-859.7
spellingShingle Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics
R858-859.7
Sarah Lagan
Patrick Aquino
Margaret R. Emerson
Karen Fortuna
Robert Walker
John Torous
Actionable health app evaluation: translating expert frameworks into objective metrics
description Abstract As use and availability of mobile health apps have increased, so too has the need for a thorough, accessible framework for app evaluation. The American Psychiatric Association’s app evaluation model has emerged as a way to critically assess an app by considering accessibility, privacy and security, clinical foundation, engagement, and interoperability; however, there is no centralized database where users can view how various health apps perform when assessed via the APA model. In this perspective, we propose and outline our effort to translate the APA’s model for the evaluation of health apps into a set of objective metrics that can be published online, making the framework actionable and accessible to a broad audience. The questions from the APA model were operationalized into 105 objective questions that are either binary or numeric. These questions serve as the foundation of an online database, where app evaluation consists of answering these 105 questions and can be crowdsourced. While the database has yet to be published and crowdsourced, initial internal testing demonstrated excellent interrater reliability. The database proposed here introduces a public and interactive approach to data collection that is guided by the APA model. The published product enables users to sort through the many mobile health apps and filter them according to individual preferences and priorities, making the ever-growing health app market more navigable.
format article
author Sarah Lagan
Patrick Aquino
Margaret R. Emerson
Karen Fortuna
Robert Walker
John Torous
author_facet Sarah Lagan
Patrick Aquino
Margaret R. Emerson
Karen Fortuna
Robert Walker
John Torous
author_sort Sarah Lagan
title Actionable health app evaluation: translating expert frameworks into objective metrics
title_short Actionable health app evaluation: translating expert frameworks into objective metrics
title_full Actionable health app evaluation: translating expert frameworks into objective metrics
title_fullStr Actionable health app evaluation: translating expert frameworks into objective metrics
title_full_unstemmed Actionable health app evaluation: translating expert frameworks into objective metrics
title_sort actionable health app evaluation: translating expert frameworks into objective metrics
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/84c81d972bea497c963e26ad8c7d76b3
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahlagan actionablehealthappevaluationtranslatingexpertframeworksintoobjectivemetrics
AT patrickaquino actionablehealthappevaluationtranslatingexpertframeworksintoobjectivemetrics
AT margaretremerson actionablehealthappevaluationtranslatingexpertframeworksintoobjectivemetrics
AT karenfortuna actionablehealthappevaluationtranslatingexpertframeworksintoobjectivemetrics
AT robertwalker actionablehealthappevaluationtranslatingexpertframeworksintoobjectivemetrics
AT johntorous actionablehealthappevaluationtranslatingexpertframeworksintoobjectivemetrics
_version_ 1718383885713145856