The Construction of Crisis: The ‘internal‑identitarian’ nexus in Russian‑European relations and its significance beyond the Ukraine crisis
Since 2012 and with Putin’s return to the presidency, Russian politics underwent a process of securitization of domestic politics. This laid the groundwork for the crisis in European-Russian relations that culminated in the ‘Ukraine crisis’ from late 2013. This article will trace the domestic determ...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | CS EN SK |
Publicado: |
Sciendo
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/84df04ea94dc4ebcae1f18c69d2bc0b0 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:84df04ea94dc4ebcae1f18c69d2bc0b0 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:84df04ea94dc4ebcae1f18c69d2bc0b02021-12-02T19:09:23ZThe Construction of Crisis: The ‘internal‑identitarian’ nexus in Russian‑European relations and its significance beyond the Ukraine crisis1801-342210.1515/pce-2016-0006https://doaj.org/article/84df04ea94dc4ebcae1f18c69d2bc0b02016-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1515/pce-2016-0006https://doaj.org/toc/1801-3422Since 2012 and with Putin’s return to the presidency, Russian politics underwent a process of securitization of domestic politics. This laid the groundwork for the crisis in European-Russian relations that culminated in the ‘Ukraine crisis’ from late 2013. This article will trace the domestic determinants of Russian foreign policy choices and narratives since 2012 that help explain the political deadlock between ‘the West’ and Russia over the European Union’s ‘Eastern Partnership’. It will thereby also analyze the effects for the Russian perception of agency between the US and the EU as well as path dependencies that European Union sanctions have created. Not only Russia’s relationship with the West is at stake in this stand-off. The ‘Ukraine crisis’ has developed into a fundamental systemic crisis of the Putinite regime. Only if Putin’s ‘social contract’, which had guaranteed economic well-being in exchange for political inactivity, was to be eroded by sanctions imposed on Russia, the ‘civilizational’ narrative of Russian exclusivity would be endangered. A new social contract will be a generational task and will have to take stock of the nexus between internal determinants and identitarian foreign policy choices. It will also be the first step in recalibrating European-Russia relations.Pieper MoritzSciendoarticleukraine crisisrussian-european relationsdomestic factors in identity projectionrussia sanctionsputin’s ‘social contract’Political scienceJCSENSKPolitics in Central Europe, Vol 12, Iss 1, Pp 95-110 (2016) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
CS EN SK |
topic |
ukraine crisis russian-european relations domestic factors in identity projection russia sanctions putin’s ‘social contract’ Political science J |
spellingShingle |
ukraine crisis russian-european relations domestic factors in identity projection russia sanctions putin’s ‘social contract’ Political science J Pieper Moritz The Construction of Crisis: The ‘internal‑identitarian’ nexus in Russian‑European relations and its significance beyond the Ukraine crisis |
description |
Since 2012 and with Putin’s return to the presidency, Russian politics underwent a process of securitization of domestic politics. This laid the groundwork for the crisis in European-Russian relations that culminated in the ‘Ukraine crisis’ from late 2013. This article will trace the domestic determinants of Russian foreign policy choices and narratives since 2012 that help explain the political deadlock between ‘the West’ and Russia over the European Union’s ‘Eastern Partnership’. It will thereby also analyze the effects for the Russian perception of agency between the US and the EU as well as path dependencies that European Union sanctions have created. Not only Russia’s relationship with the West is at stake in this stand-off. The ‘Ukraine crisis’ has developed into a fundamental systemic crisis of the Putinite regime. Only if Putin’s ‘social contract’, which had guaranteed economic well-being in exchange for political inactivity, was to be eroded by sanctions imposed on Russia, the ‘civilizational’ narrative of Russian exclusivity would be endangered. A new social contract will be a generational task and will have to take stock of the nexus between internal determinants and identitarian foreign policy choices. It will also be the first step in recalibrating European-Russia relations. |
format |
article |
author |
Pieper Moritz |
author_facet |
Pieper Moritz |
author_sort |
Pieper Moritz |
title |
The Construction of Crisis: The ‘internal‑identitarian’ nexus in Russian‑European relations and its significance beyond the Ukraine crisis |
title_short |
The Construction of Crisis: The ‘internal‑identitarian’ nexus in Russian‑European relations and its significance beyond the Ukraine crisis |
title_full |
The Construction of Crisis: The ‘internal‑identitarian’ nexus in Russian‑European relations and its significance beyond the Ukraine crisis |
title_fullStr |
The Construction of Crisis: The ‘internal‑identitarian’ nexus in Russian‑European relations and its significance beyond the Ukraine crisis |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Construction of Crisis: The ‘internal‑identitarian’ nexus in Russian‑European relations and its significance beyond the Ukraine crisis |
title_sort |
construction of crisis: the ‘internal‑identitarian’ nexus in russian‑european relations and its significance beyond the ukraine crisis |
publisher |
Sciendo |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/84df04ea94dc4ebcae1f18c69d2bc0b0 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT piepermoritz theconstructionofcrisistheinternalidentitariannexusinrussianeuropeanrelationsanditssignificancebeyondtheukrainecrisis AT piepermoritz constructionofcrisistheinternalidentitariannexusinrussianeuropeanrelationsanditssignificancebeyondtheukrainecrisis |
_version_ |
1718377099454054400 |