The Construction of Crisis: The ‘internal‑identitarian’ nexus in Russian‑European relations and its significance beyond the Ukraine crisis

Since 2012 and with Putin’s return to the presidency, Russian politics underwent a process of securitization of domestic politics. This laid the groundwork for the crisis in European-Russian relations that culminated in the ‘Ukraine crisis’ from late 2013. This article will trace the domestic determ...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Pieper Moritz
Formato: article
Lenguaje:CS
EN
SK
Publicado: Sciendo 2016
Materias:
J
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/84df04ea94dc4ebcae1f18c69d2bc0b0
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:84df04ea94dc4ebcae1f18c69d2bc0b0
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:84df04ea94dc4ebcae1f18c69d2bc0b02021-12-02T19:09:23ZThe Construction of Crisis: The ‘internal‑identitarian’ nexus in Russian‑European relations and its significance beyond the Ukraine crisis1801-342210.1515/pce-2016-0006https://doaj.org/article/84df04ea94dc4ebcae1f18c69d2bc0b02016-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1515/pce-2016-0006https://doaj.org/toc/1801-3422Since 2012 and with Putin’s return to the presidency, Russian politics underwent a process of securitization of domestic politics. This laid the groundwork for the crisis in European-Russian relations that culminated in the ‘Ukraine crisis’ from late 2013. This article will trace the domestic determinants of Russian foreign policy choices and narratives since 2012 that help explain the political deadlock between ‘the West’ and Russia over the European Union’s ‘Eastern Partnership’. It will thereby also analyze the effects for the Russian perception of agency between the US and the EU as well as path dependencies that European Union sanctions have created. Not only Russia’s relationship with the West is at stake in this stand-off. The ‘Ukraine crisis’ has developed into a fundamental systemic crisis of the Putinite regime. Only if Putin’s ‘social contract’, which had guaranteed economic well-being in exchange for political inactivity, was to be eroded by sanctions imposed on Russia, the ‘civilizational’ narrative of Russian exclusivity would be endangered. A new social contract will be a generational task and will have to take stock of the nexus between internal determinants and identitarian foreign policy choices. It will also be the first step in recalibrating European-Russia relations.Pieper MoritzSciendoarticleukraine crisisrussian-european relationsdomestic factors in identity projectionrussia sanctionsputin’s ‘social contract’Political scienceJCSENSKPolitics in Central Europe, Vol 12, Iss 1, Pp 95-110 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language CS
EN
SK
topic ukraine crisis
russian-european relations
domestic factors in identity projection
russia sanctions
putin’s ‘social contract’
Political science
J
spellingShingle ukraine crisis
russian-european relations
domestic factors in identity projection
russia sanctions
putin’s ‘social contract’
Political science
J
Pieper Moritz
The Construction of Crisis: The ‘internal‑identitarian’ nexus in Russian‑European relations and its significance beyond the Ukraine crisis
description Since 2012 and with Putin’s return to the presidency, Russian politics underwent a process of securitization of domestic politics. This laid the groundwork for the crisis in European-Russian relations that culminated in the ‘Ukraine crisis’ from late 2013. This article will trace the domestic determinants of Russian foreign policy choices and narratives since 2012 that help explain the political deadlock between ‘the West’ and Russia over the European Union’s ‘Eastern Partnership’. It will thereby also analyze the effects for the Russian perception of agency between the US and the EU as well as path dependencies that European Union sanctions have created. Not only Russia’s relationship with the West is at stake in this stand-off. The ‘Ukraine crisis’ has developed into a fundamental systemic crisis of the Putinite regime. Only if Putin’s ‘social contract’, which had guaranteed economic well-being in exchange for political inactivity, was to be eroded by sanctions imposed on Russia, the ‘civilizational’ narrative of Russian exclusivity would be endangered. A new social contract will be a generational task and will have to take stock of the nexus between internal determinants and identitarian foreign policy choices. It will also be the first step in recalibrating European-Russia relations.
format article
author Pieper Moritz
author_facet Pieper Moritz
author_sort Pieper Moritz
title The Construction of Crisis: The ‘internal‑identitarian’ nexus in Russian‑European relations and its significance beyond the Ukraine crisis
title_short The Construction of Crisis: The ‘internal‑identitarian’ nexus in Russian‑European relations and its significance beyond the Ukraine crisis
title_full The Construction of Crisis: The ‘internal‑identitarian’ nexus in Russian‑European relations and its significance beyond the Ukraine crisis
title_fullStr The Construction of Crisis: The ‘internal‑identitarian’ nexus in Russian‑European relations and its significance beyond the Ukraine crisis
title_full_unstemmed The Construction of Crisis: The ‘internal‑identitarian’ nexus in Russian‑European relations and its significance beyond the Ukraine crisis
title_sort construction of crisis: the ‘internal‑identitarian’ nexus in russian‑european relations and its significance beyond the ukraine crisis
publisher Sciendo
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/84df04ea94dc4ebcae1f18c69d2bc0b0
work_keys_str_mv AT piepermoritz theconstructionofcrisistheinternalidentitariannexusinrussianeuropeanrelationsanditssignificancebeyondtheukrainecrisis
AT piepermoritz constructionofcrisistheinternalidentitariannexusinrussianeuropeanrelationsanditssignificancebeyondtheukrainecrisis
_version_ 1718377099454054400