CBCT‐based assessment of the anatomic relationship between maxillary sinus and upper teeth

Abstract Objectives To describe the relationship between maxillary sinus (MS) and upper teeth based on cone beam computed tomographic scans (CBCT). Materials and methods Based on CBCT maxillary imaging data of 147 patients, distance between MS and apices of canines and posterior maxillary teeth were...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tobias Regnstrand, Andres Torres, Eline Petitjean, Paul Lambrechts, Daniel Benchimol, Reinhilde Jacobs
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Wiley 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/84fec0019edf4ec084af3ddb2cdb9823
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:84fec0019edf4ec084af3ddb2cdb9823
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:84fec0019edf4ec084af3ddb2cdb98232021-12-02T12:59:21ZCBCT‐based assessment of the anatomic relationship between maxillary sinus and upper teeth2057-434710.1002/cre2.451https://doaj.org/article/84fec0019edf4ec084af3ddb2cdb98232021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.451https://doaj.org/toc/2057-4347Abstract Objectives To describe the relationship between maxillary sinus (MS) and upper teeth based on cone beam computed tomographic scans (CBCT). Materials and methods Based on CBCT maxillary imaging data of 147 patients, distance between MS and apices of canines and posterior maxillary teeth were assessed. Distances between tooth roots and sinus were classified into three groups: distant (>2 mm), close (<2 mm) or in contact with MS. Teeth with apical lesions and uncommon root configurations were excluded. Results In total, 1075 teeth of maxillary canines, upper premolars and upper molars were included in this study. Teeth most often in contact with MS were the second (89%) and first (81%) maxillary molar without any significant difference (p = 0.19). Roots most often in contact with MS were the mesiobuccal and distobuccal root of the second molar (85% and 76%; p = <0.01) followed by the palatal root of the first molar (73%). A fifth of the upper canines are situated less than 2 mm from MS. Conclusions More than four out of five upper molars (first and second) are in a close relationship to the MS. Knowledge of the anatomical relationship between posterior maxillary teeth and the MS is important for diagnosis and treatment in this area.Tobias RegnstrandAndres TorresEline PetitjeanPaul LambrechtsDaniel BenchimolReinhilde JacobsWileyarticleanatomycaninecone‐beam computed tomographymaxillary sinusmolarpremolarDentistryRK1-715ENClinical and Experimental Dental Research, Vol 7, Iss 6, Pp 1197-1204 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic anatomy
canine
cone‐beam computed tomography
maxillary sinus
molar
premolar
Dentistry
RK1-715
spellingShingle anatomy
canine
cone‐beam computed tomography
maxillary sinus
molar
premolar
Dentistry
RK1-715
Tobias Regnstrand
Andres Torres
Eline Petitjean
Paul Lambrechts
Daniel Benchimol
Reinhilde Jacobs
CBCT‐based assessment of the anatomic relationship between maxillary sinus and upper teeth
description Abstract Objectives To describe the relationship between maxillary sinus (MS) and upper teeth based on cone beam computed tomographic scans (CBCT). Materials and methods Based on CBCT maxillary imaging data of 147 patients, distance between MS and apices of canines and posterior maxillary teeth were assessed. Distances between tooth roots and sinus were classified into three groups: distant (>2 mm), close (<2 mm) or in contact with MS. Teeth with apical lesions and uncommon root configurations were excluded. Results In total, 1075 teeth of maxillary canines, upper premolars and upper molars were included in this study. Teeth most often in contact with MS were the second (89%) and first (81%) maxillary molar without any significant difference (p = 0.19). Roots most often in contact with MS were the mesiobuccal and distobuccal root of the second molar (85% and 76%; p = <0.01) followed by the palatal root of the first molar (73%). A fifth of the upper canines are situated less than 2 mm from MS. Conclusions More than four out of five upper molars (first and second) are in a close relationship to the MS. Knowledge of the anatomical relationship between posterior maxillary teeth and the MS is important for diagnosis and treatment in this area.
format article
author Tobias Regnstrand
Andres Torres
Eline Petitjean
Paul Lambrechts
Daniel Benchimol
Reinhilde Jacobs
author_facet Tobias Regnstrand
Andres Torres
Eline Petitjean
Paul Lambrechts
Daniel Benchimol
Reinhilde Jacobs
author_sort Tobias Regnstrand
title CBCT‐based assessment of the anatomic relationship between maxillary sinus and upper teeth
title_short CBCT‐based assessment of the anatomic relationship between maxillary sinus and upper teeth
title_full CBCT‐based assessment of the anatomic relationship between maxillary sinus and upper teeth
title_fullStr CBCT‐based assessment of the anatomic relationship between maxillary sinus and upper teeth
title_full_unstemmed CBCT‐based assessment of the anatomic relationship between maxillary sinus and upper teeth
title_sort cbct‐based assessment of the anatomic relationship between maxillary sinus and upper teeth
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/84fec0019edf4ec084af3ddb2cdb9823
work_keys_str_mv AT tobiasregnstrand cbctbasedassessmentoftheanatomicrelationshipbetweenmaxillarysinusandupperteeth
AT andrestorres cbctbasedassessmentoftheanatomicrelationshipbetweenmaxillarysinusandupperteeth
AT elinepetitjean cbctbasedassessmentoftheanatomicrelationshipbetweenmaxillarysinusandupperteeth
AT paullambrechts cbctbasedassessmentoftheanatomicrelationshipbetweenmaxillarysinusandupperteeth
AT danielbenchimol cbctbasedassessmentoftheanatomicrelationshipbetweenmaxillarysinusandupperteeth
AT reinhildejacobs cbctbasedassessmentoftheanatomicrelationshipbetweenmaxillarysinusandupperteeth
_version_ 1718393577173680128