Humans choose representatives who enforce cooperation in social dilemmas through extortion
Social dilemmas force players to balance between personal and collective gain. Here, inspired by the negotiations for greenhouse-gas emission limitations, the authors experimentally studied a representative-based collective-risk scenario, reporting the emergence of extortionate zero-determinant (ZD)...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Manfred Milinski, Christian Hilbe, Dirk Semmann, Ralf Sommerfeld, Jochem Marotzke |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/85149ede06b944baa92958a9014b283a |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Extortion strategies resist disciplining when higher competitiveness is rewarded with extra gain
por: Lutz Becks, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Extortion can outperform generosity in the iterated prisoner’s dilemma
por: Zhijian Wang, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Human players manage to extort more than the mutual cooperation payoff in repeated social dilemmas
por: Chiara D’Arcangelo, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
The evolution of strategic timing in collective-risk dilemmas.
por: Christian Hilbe, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Temporal assortment of cooperators in the spatial prisoner’s dilemma
por: Tim Johnson, et al.
Publicado: (2021)