Marine habitat use and feeding ecology of introduced anadromous brown trout at the colonization front of the sub-Antarctic Kerguelen archipelago

Abstract In 1954, brown trout were introduced to the Kerguelen archipelago (49°S, 70°E), a pristine, sub-Antarctic environment previously devoid of native freshwater fishes. Trout began spreading rapidly via coastal waters to colonize adjacent watersheds, however, recent and unexpectedly the spread...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jan Grimsrud Davidsen, Xavier Bordeleau, Sindre Håvarstein Eldøy, Frederick Whoriskey, Michael Power, Glenn T. Crossin, Colin Buhariwalla, Philippe Gaudin
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/853ac7d1f1af4a9fa805ca303443e897
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:853ac7d1f1af4a9fa805ca303443e897
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:853ac7d1f1af4a9fa805ca303443e8972021-12-02T14:58:14ZMarine habitat use and feeding ecology of introduced anadromous brown trout at the colonization front of the sub-Antarctic Kerguelen archipelago10.1038/s41598-021-91405-x2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/853ac7d1f1af4a9fa805ca303443e8972021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91405-xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract In 1954, brown trout were introduced to the Kerguelen archipelago (49°S, 70°E), a pristine, sub-Antarctic environment previously devoid of native freshwater fishes. Trout began spreading rapidly via coastal waters to colonize adjacent watersheds, however, recent and unexpectedly the spread has slowed. To better understand the ecology of the brown trout here, and why their expansion has slowed, we documented the marine habitat use, foraging ecology, and environmental conditions experienced over one year by 50 acoustically tagged individuals at the colonization front. Trout mainly utilized the marine habitat proximate to their tagging site, ranging no further than 7 km and not entering any uncolonized watersheds. Nutritional indicators showed that trout were in good condition at the time of tagging. Stomach contents and isotope signatures in muscle of additional trout revealed a diet of amphipods (68%), fish (23%), isopods (6%), and zooplankton (6%). The small migration distances observed, presence of suitable habitat, and rich local foraging opportunities suggest that trout can achieve their resource needs close to their home rivers. This may explain why the expansion of brown trout at Kerguelen has slowed.Jan Grimsrud DavidsenXavier BordeleauSindre Håvarstein EldøyFrederick WhoriskeyMichael PowerGlenn T. CrossinColin BuhariwallaPhilippe GaudinNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Jan Grimsrud Davidsen
Xavier Bordeleau
Sindre Håvarstein Eldøy
Frederick Whoriskey
Michael Power
Glenn T. Crossin
Colin Buhariwalla
Philippe Gaudin
Marine habitat use and feeding ecology of introduced anadromous brown trout at the colonization front of the sub-Antarctic Kerguelen archipelago
description Abstract In 1954, brown trout were introduced to the Kerguelen archipelago (49°S, 70°E), a pristine, sub-Antarctic environment previously devoid of native freshwater fishes. Trout began spreading rapidly via coastal waters to colonize adjacent watersheds, however, recent and unexpectedly the spread has slowed. To better understand the ecology of the brown trout here, and why their expansion has slowed, we documented the marine habitat use, foraging ecology, and environmental conditions experienced over one year by 50 acoustically tagged individuals at the colonization front. Trout mainly utilized the marine habitat proximate to their tagging site, ranging no further than 7 km and not entering any uncolonized watersheds. Nutritional indicators showed that trout were in good condition at the time of tagging. Stomach contents and isotope signatures in muscle of additional trout revealed a diet of amphipods (68%), fish (23%), isopods (6%), and zooplankton (6%). The small migration distances observed, presence of suitable habitat, and rich local foraging opportunities suggest that trout can achieve their resource needs close to their home rivers. This may explain why the expansion of brown trout at Kerguelen has slowed.
format article
author Jan Grimsrud Davidsen
Xavier Bordeleau
Sindre Håvarstein Eldøy
Frederick Whoriskey
Michael Power
Glenn T. Crossin
Colin Buhariwalla
Philippe Gaudin
author_facet Jan Grimsrud Davidsen
Xavier Bordeleau
Sindre Håvarstein Eldøy
Frederick Whoriskey
Michael Power
Glenn T. Crossin
Colin Buhariwalla
Philippe Gaudin
author_sort Jan Grimsrud Davidsen
title Marine habitat use and feeding ecology of introduced anadromous brown trout at the colonization front of the sub-Antarctic Kerguelen archipelago
title_short Marine habitat use and feeding ecology of introduced anadromous brown trout at the colonization front of the sub-Antarctic Kerguelen archipelago
title_full Marine habitat use and feeding ecology of introduced anadromous brown trout at the colonization front of the sub-Antarctic Kerguelen archipelago
title_fullStr Marine habitat use and feeding ecology of introduced anadromous brown trout at the colonization front of the sub-Antarctic Kerguelen archipelago
title_full_unstemmed Marine habitat use and feeding ecology of introduced anadromous brown trout at the colonization front of the sub-Antarctic Kerguelen archipelago
title_sort marine habitat use and feeding ecology of introduced anadromous brown trout at the colonization front of the sub-antarctic kerguelen archipelago
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/853ac7d1f1af4a9fa805ca303443e897
work_keys_str_mv AT jangrimsruddavidsen marinehabitatuseandfeedingecologyofintroducedanadromousbrowntroutatthecolonizationfrontofthesubantarctickerguelenarchipelago
AT xavierbordeleau marinehabitatuseandfeedingecologyofintroducedanadromousbrowntroutatthecolonizationfrontofthesubantarctickerguelenarchipelago
AT sindrehavarsteineldøy marinehabitatuseandfeedingecologyofintroducedanadromousbrowntroutatthecolonizationfrontofthesubantarctickerguelenarchipelago
AT frederickwhoriskey marinehabitatuseandfeedingecologyofintroducedanadromousbrowntroutatthecolonizationfrontofthesubantarctickerguelenarchipelago
AT michaelpower marinehabitatuseandfeedingecologyofintroducedanadromousbrowntroutatthecolonizationfrontofthesubantarctickerguelenarchipelago
AT glenntcrossin marinehabitatuseandfeedingecologyofintroducedanadromousbrowntroutatthecolonizationfrontofthesubantarctickerguelenarchipelago
AT colinbuhariwalla marinehabitatuseandfeedingecologyofintroducedanadromousbrowntroutatthecolonizationfrontofthesubantarctickerguelenarchipelago
AT philippegaudin marinehabitatuseandfeedingecologyofintroducedanadromousbrowntroutatthecolonizationfrontofthesubantarctickerguelenarchipelago
_version_ 1718389333893840896