Comparative Sensitivity of Rapid Antigen Tests for the Delta Variant (B.1.617.2) of SARS-CoV-2
Rapid antigen tests (RATs) for COVID-19 based on lateral flow immunoassays are useful for rapid diagnosis in a variety of settings. Although many kinds of RATs are available, their respective sensitivity has not been compared. Here, we examined the sensitivity of 27 RATs available in Japan for the d...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/8553804083414326bc8194d3b5a8f53b |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:8553804083414326bc8194d3b5a8f53b |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:8553804083414326bc8194d3b5a8f53b2021-11-25T19:13:10ZComparative Sensitivity of Rapid Antigen Tests for the Delta Variant (B.1.617.2) of SARS-CoV-210.3390/v131121831999-4915https://doaj.org/article/8553804083414326bc8194d3b5a8f53b2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/11/2183https://doaj.org/toc/1999-4915Rapid antigen tests (RATs) for COVID-19 based on lateral flow immunoassays are useful for rapid diagnosis in a variety of settings. Although many kinds of RATs are available, their respective sensitivity has not been compared. Here, we examined the sensitivity of 27 RATs available in Japan for the detection of the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant. All of the RATs tested detected the delta variant albeit with different sensitivities. Nine RATs (ESPLINE SARS-CoV-2, ALSONIC COVID-19 Ag, COVID-19 and Influenza A+B Antigen Combo Rapid Test, ImmunoArrow SARS-CoV-2, Fuji Dri-chem immuno AG cartridge COVID-19 Ag, 2019-nCoV Ag rapid detection kit, Saliva SARS-CoV-2(2019-nCoV) Antigen Test Kit, and Rabliss SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection kit COVID19 AG) showed superior sensitivity to the isolated delta variant. Although actual clinical specimens were not examined, the detection level of most of the RATs was 7500 pfu, indicating that individuals whose test samples contained less virus than that would be considered negative. Therefore, it is important to bear in mind that RATs may miss individuals shedding low levels of infectious virus.Yuko Sakai-TagawaSeiya YamayoshiPeter J. HalfmannYoshihiro KawaokaMDPI AGarticleSARS-CoV-2COVID-19rapid antigen testsensitivitydelta variantB.1.617.2MicrobiologyQR1-502ENViruses, Vol 13, Iss 2183, p 2183 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 rapid antigen test sensitivity delta variant B.1.617.2 Microbiology QR1-502 |
spellingShingle |
SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 rapid antigen test sensitivity delta variant B.1.617.2 Microbiology QR1-502 Yuko Sakai-Tagawa Seiya Yamayoshi Peter J. Halfmann Yoshihiro Kawaoka Comparative Sensitivity of Rapid Antigen Tests for the Delta Variant (B.1.617.2) of SARS-CoV-2 |
description |
Rapid antigen tests (RATs) for COVID-19 based on lateral flow immunoassays are useful for rapid diagnosis in a variety of settings. Although many kinds of RATs are available, their respective sensitivity has not been compared. Here, we examined the sensitivity of 27 RATs available in Japan for the detection of the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant. All of the RATs tested detected the delta variant albeit with different sensitivities. Nine RATs (ESPLINE SARS-CoV-2, ALSONIC COVID-19 Ag, COVID-19 and Influenza A+B Antigen Combo Rapid Test, ImmunoArrow SARS-CoV-2, Fuji Dri-chem immuno AG cartridge COVID-19 Ag, 2019-nCoV Ag rapid detection kit, Saliva SARS-CoV-2(2019-nCoV) Antigen Test Kit, and Rabliss SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection kit COVID19 AG) showed superior sensitivity to the isolated delta variant. Although actual clinical specimens were not examined, the detection level of most of the RATs was 7500 pfu, indicating that individuals whose test samples contained less virus than that would be considered negative. Therefore, it is important to bear in mind that RATs may miss individuals shedding low levels of infectious virus. |
format |
article |
author |
Yuko Sakai-Tagawa Seiya Yamayoshi Peter J. Halfmann Yoshihiro Kawaoka |
author_facet |
Yuko Sakai-Tagawa Seiya Yamayoshi Peter J. Halfmann Yoshihiro Kawaoka |
author_sort |
Yuko Sakai-Tagawa |
title |
Comparative Sensitivity of Rapid Antigen Tests for the Delta Variant (B.1.617.2) of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_short |
Comparative Sensitivity of Rapid Antigen Tests for the Delta Variant (B.1.617.2) of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_full |
Comparative Sensitivity of Rapid Antigen Tests for the Delta Variant (B.1.617.2) of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_fullStr |
Comparative Sensitivity of Rapid Antigen Tests for the Delta Variant (B.1.617.2) of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative Sensitivity of Rapid Antigen Tests for the Delta Variant (B.1.617.2) of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_sort |
comparative sensitivity of rapid antigen tests for the delta variant (b.1.617.2) of sars-cov-2 |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/8553804083414326bc8194d3b5a8f53b |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yukosakaitagawa comparativesensitivityofrapidantigentestsforthedeltavariantb16172ofsarscov2 AT seiyayamayoshi comparativesensitivityofrapidantigentestsforthedeltavariantb16172ofsarscov2 AT peterjhalfmann comparativesensitivityofrapidantigentestsforthedeltavariantb16172ofsarscov2 AT yoshihirokawaoka comparativesensitivityofrapidantigentestsforthedeltavariantb16172ofsarscov2 |
_version_ |
1718410167702257664 |