An Extraterritorial Privacy Zone?
The Protestant Reformation led to a radical redrawing of the map of Europe, severely affecting international relations. An important consequence of Protestantism was the emphasis on the private dimension of religious practices, as it did away with clerical intermediaries and instead put the focus o...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN NL |
| Publicado: |
Open Journals
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/857793f8e43b4279befaffbd8d87334a |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:857793f8e43b4279befaffbd8d87334a |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:857793f8e43b4279befaffbd8d87334a2021-11-29T13:45:55ZAn Extraterritorial Privacy Zone? 10.52024/tseg.110421572-17012468-9068https://doaj.org/article/857793f8e43b4279befaffbd8d87334a2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://tseg.nl/article/view/11042https://doaj.org/toc/1572-1701https://doaj.org/toc/2468-9068 The Protestant Reformation led to a radical redrawing of the map of Europe, severely affecting international relations. An important consequence of Protestantism was the emphasis on the private dimension of religious practices, as it did away with clerical intermediaries and instead put the focus on the direct relationship between God and the believer. In this context, to facilitate diplomatic traffic between Catholic and Protestant countries, ambassadors came to enjoy the so-called Right of Chapel, allowing them to create a private place of worship and have a private chaplain at their ambassadorial residences. This right was explicitly included in two treaties that the Kingdom of Portugal and the Dutch Republic concluded with each other in the mid-seventeenth century. However, the two parties to the treaties had starkly different understandings of what was meant by ‘private’. Both of these treaties granted Dutch citizens in Portugal freedom of conscience in their own houses, but the contrasting interpretations of what ‘private’ actually meant for the Dutch and for the Portuguese resulted in serious disagreement about the exact scope of these religious rights. Tom-Eric KrijgerOpen JournalsarticleReligious TolerationFreedom of ConscienceDiplomacyEmbassy ChapelsLisbonPortugalSocial history and conditions. Social problems. Social reformHN1-995Economic history and conditionsHC10-1085ENNLTijdschrift voor Sociale en Economische Geschiedenis, Vol 18, Iss 3 (2021) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN NL |
| topic |
Religious Toleration Freedom of Conscience Diplomacy Embassy Chapels Lisbon Portugal Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform HN1-995 Economic history and conditions HC10-1085 |
| spellingShingle |
Religious Toleration Freedom of Conscience Diplomacy Embassy Chapels Lisbon Portugal Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform HN1-995 Economic history and conditions HC10-1085 Tom-Eric Krijger An Extraterritorial Privacy Zone? |
| description |
The Protestant Reformation led to a radical redrawing of the map of Europe, severely affecting international relations. An important consequence of Protestantism was the emphasis on the private dimension of religious practices, as it did away with clerical intermediaries and instead put the focus on the direct relationship between God and the believer. In this context, to facilitate diplomatic traffic between Catholic and Protestant countries, ambassadors came to enjoy the so-called Right of Chapel, allowing them to create a private place of worship and have a private chaplain at their ambassadorial residences. This right was explicitly included in two treaties that the Kingdom of Portugal and the Dutch Republic concluded with each other in the mid-seventeenth century. However, the two parties to the treaties had starkly different understandings of what was meant by ‘private’. Both of these treaties granted Dutch citizens in Portugal freedom of conscience in their own houses, but the contrasting interpretations of what ‘private’ actually meant for the Dutch and for the Portuguese resulted in serious disagreement about the exact scope of these religious rights.
|
| format |
article |
| author |
Tom-Eric Krijger |
| author_facet |
Tom-Eric Krijger |
| author_sort |
Tom-Eric Krijger |
| title |
An Extraterritorial Privacy Zone? |
| title_short |
An Extraterritorial Privacy Zone? |
| title_full |
An Extraterritorial Privacy Zone? |
| title_fullStr |
An Extraterritorial Privacy Zone? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
An Extraterritorial Privacy Zone? |
| title_sort |
extraterritorial privacy zone? |
| publisher |
Open Journals |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/857793f8e43b4279befaffbd8d87334a |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT tomerickrijger anextraterritorialprivacyzone AT tomerickrijger extraterritorialprivacyzone |
| _version_ |
1718407356803448832 |