A deep learning based automatic segmentation approach for anatomical structures in intensity modulation radiotherapy

Objective: To evaluate the automatic segmentation approach for organ at risk (OARs) and compare the parameters of dose volume histogram (DVH) in radiotherapy. Methodology: Thirty-three patients were selected to contour OARs using automatic segmentation approach which based on U-Net, applying them t...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han Zhou, Yikun Li, Ying Gu, Zetian Shen, Xixu Zhu, Yun Ge
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: AIMS Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/85948d365ee046f193c37539525c2b9b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:85948d365ee046f193c37539525c2b9b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:85948d365ee046f193c37539525c2b9b2021-11-23T02:17:45ZA deep learning based automatic segmentation approach for anatomical structures in intensity modulation radiotherapy10.3934/mbe.20213711551-0018https://doaj.org/article/85948d365ee046f193c37539525c2b9b2021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.aimspress.com/article/doi/10.3934/mbe.2021371?viewType=HTMLhttps://doaj.org/toc/1551-0018Objective: To evaluate the automatic segmentation approach for organ at risk (OARs) and compare the parameters of dose volume histogram (DVH) in radiotherapy. Methodology: Thirty-three patients were selected to contour OARs using automatic segmentation approach which based on U-Net, applying them to a number of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), breast, and rectal cancer respectively. The automatic contours were transferred to the Pinnacle System to evaluate contour accuracy and compare the DVH parameters. Results: The time for manual contour was 56.5 ± 9, 23.12 ± 4.23 and 45.23 ± 2.39min for the OARs of NPC, breast and rectal cancer, and for automatic contour was 1.5 ± 0.23, 1.45 ± 0.78 and 1.8 ± 0.56 min. Automatic contours of Eye with the best Dice-similarity coefficients (DSC) of 0.907 ± 0.02 while with the poorest DSC of 0.459 ± 0.112 of Spinal Cord for NPC; And Lung with the best DSC of 0.944 ± 0.03 while with the poorest DSC of 0.709 ± 0.1 of Spinal Cord for breast; And Bladder with the best DSC of 0.91 ± 0.04 while with the poorest DSC of 0.43 ± 0.1 of Femoral heads for rectal cancer. The contours of Spinal Cord in H & N had poor results due to the division of the medulla oblongata. The contours of Femoral head, which different from what we expect, also due to manual contour result in poor DSC. Conclusion: The automatic contour approach based deep learning method with sufficient accuracy for research purposes. However, the value of DSC does not fully reflect the accuracy of dose distribution, but can cause dose changes due to the changes in the OARs volume and DSC from the data. Considering the significantly time-saving and good performance in partial OARs, the automatic contouring also plays a supervisory role.Han Zhou Yikun LiYing GuZetian ShenXixu ZhuYun GeAIMS Pressarticleautomatic segment approachdeep learningorgan at riskintensity modulated radiotherapydose volume histogramBiotechnologyTP248.13-248.65MathematicsQA1-939ENMathematical Biosciences and Engineering, Vol 18, Iss 6, Pp 7506-7524 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic automatic segment approach
deep learning
organ at risk
intensity modulated radiotherapy
dose volume histogram
Biotechnology
TP248.13-248.65
Mathematics
QA1-939
spellingShingle automatic segment approach
deep learning
organ at risk
intensity modulated radiotherapy
dose volume histogram
Biotechnology
TP248.13-248.65
Mathematics
QA1-939
Han Zhou
Yikun Li
Ying Gu
Zetian Shen
Xixu Zhu
Yun Ge
A deep learning based automatic segmentation approach for anatomical structures in intensity modulation radiotherapy
description Objective: To evaluate the automatic segmentation approach for organ at risk (OARs) and compare the parameters of dose volume histogram (DVH) in radiotherapy. Methodology: Thirty-three patients were selected to contour OARs using automatic segmentation approach which based on U-Net, applying them to a number of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), breast, and rectal cancer respectively. The automatic contours were transferred to the Pinnacle System to evaluate contour accuracy and compare the DVH parameters. Results: The time for manual contour was 56.5 ± 9, 23.12 ± 4.23 and 45.23 ± 2.39min for the OARs of NPC, breast and rectal cancer, and for automatic contour was 1.5 ± 0.23, 1.45 ± 0.78 and 1.8 ± 0.56 min. Automatic contours of Eye with the best Dice-similarity coefficients (DSC) of 0.907 ± 0.02 while with the poorest DSC of 0.459 ± 0.112 of Spinal Cord for NPC; And Lung with the best DSC of 0.944 ± 0.03 while with the poorest DSC of 0.709 ± 0.1 of Spinal Cord for breast; And Bladder with the best DSC of 0.91 ± 0.04 while with the poorest DSC of 0.43 ± 0.1 of Femoral heads for rectal cancer. The contours of Spinal Cord in H & N had poor results due to the division of the medulla oblongata. The contours of Femoral head, which different from what we expect, also due to manual contour result in poor DSC. Conclusion: The automatic contour approach based deep learning method with sufficient accuracy for research purposes. However, the value of DSC does not fully reflect the accuracy of dose distribution, but can cause dose changes due to the changes in the OARs volume and DSC from the data. Considering the significantly time-saving and good performance in partial OARs, the automatic contouring also plays a supervisory role.
format article
author Han Zhou
Yikun Li
Ying Gu
Zetian Shen
Xixu Zhu
Yun Ge
author_facet Han Zhou
Yikun Li
Ying Gu
Zetian Shen
Xixu Zhu
Yun Ge
author_sort Han Zhou
title A deep learning based automatic segmentation approach for anatomical structures in intensity modulation radiotherapy
title_short A deep learning based automatic segmentation approach for anatomical structures in intensity modulation radiotherapy
title_full A deep learning based automatic segmentation approach for anatomical structures in intensity modulation radiotherapy
title_fullStr A deep learning based automatic segmentation approach for anatomical structures in intensity modulation radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed A deep learning based automatic segmentation approach for anatomical structures in intensity modulation radiotherapy
title_sort deep learning based automatic segmentation approach for anatomical structures in intensity modulation radiotherapy
publisher AIMS Press
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/85948d365ee046f193c37539525c2b9b
work_keys_str_mv AT hanzhou adeeplearningbasedautomaticsegmentationapproachforanatomicalstructuresinintensitymodulationradiotherapy
AT yikunli adeeplearningbasedautomaticsegmentationapproachforanatomicalstructuresinintensitymodulationradiotherapy
AT yinggu adeeplearningbasedautomaticsegmentationapproachforanatomicalstructuresinintensitymodulationradiotherapy
AT zetianshen adeeplearningbasedautomaticsegmentationapproachforanatomicalstructuresinintensitymodulationradiotherapy
AT xixuzhu adeeplearningbasedautomaticsegmentationapproachforanatomicalstructuresinintensitymodulationradiotherapy
AT yunge adeeplearningbasedautomaticsegmentationapproachforanatomicalstructuresinintensitymodulationradiotherapy
AT hanzhou deeplearningbasedautomaticsegmentationapproachforanatomicalstructuresinintensitymodulationradiotherapy
AT yikunli deeplearningbasedautomaticsegmentationapproachforanatomicalstructuresinintensitymodulationradiotherapy
AT yinggu deeplearningbasedautomaticsegmentationapproachforanatomicalstructuresinintensitymodulationradiotherapy
AT zetianshen deeplearningbasedautomaticsegmentationapproachforanatomicalstructuresinintensitymodulationradiotherapy
AT xixuzhu deeplearningbasedautomaticsegmentationapproachforanatomicalstructuresinintensitymodulationradiotherapy
AT yunge deeplearningbasedautomaticsegmentationapproachforanatomicalstructuresinintensitymodulationradiotherapy
_version_ 1718417385650651136