Supplementary solvent irrigation efficacy on filling remnants removal comparing XP-endo Finisher R vs IrriSafe

Abstract This study aimed to compare the efficacy of XP-endo Finisher R and IrriSafe, with a solvent mixture of Methyl ethyl ketone/Tetrachloroethylene (MEK/TCE), in the removal of root filling residues. Twenty-four human mandibular incisors were pair-matched by micro-computed tomography according t...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Inês Ferreira, Pedro S. Babo, Ana Cristina Braga, Maria Ascensão Lopes, Manuela E. Gomes, Irene Pina-Vaz
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/859ceb9f52ef47c89d397389acceb07c
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:859ceb9f52ef47c89d397389acceb07c
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:859ceb9f52ef47c89d397389acceb07c2021-12-02T17:40:48ZSupplementary solvent irrigation efficacy on filling remnants removal comparing XP-endo Finisher R vs IrriSafe10.1038/s41598-021-92175-22045-2322https://doaj.org/article/859ceb9f52ef47c89d397389acceb07c2021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92175-2https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract This study aimed to compare the efficacy of XP-endo Finisher R and IrriSafe, with a solvent mixture of Methyl ethyl ketone/Tetrachloroethylene (MEK/TCE), in the removal of root filling residues. Twenty-four human mandibular incisors were pair-matched by micro-computed tomography according to volume and aspect ratio. After retreatment, specimens were allocated to two experimental groups (n = 12), according to the supplementary instrument used. The volume of residual filling material after each irrigating step and the time for retreatment was calculated. Statistical analyses were carried out using Mann–Whitney test, with a significance level of 5%. The volume of initial root canal filling material between the groups was similar (p > 0.05). With the final irrigation protocol (NaOCl and EDTA) the volume of the filling remnants decreased significantly (p < 0.05) with no differences between IrriSafe or XP-endo Finisher R (p > 0.05). The additional solvent mixture MEK/TCE increased the efficiency of filling materials reduction, regardless of the agitating instruments employed, IrriSafe or XP-endo Finisher R (p < 0.05). There was no difference between the two groups regarding the time (p = 0.149). Both supplementary instruments were effective in the reduction of filling remnants. The additional step with a solvent mixture of MEK/TCE enabled a total recovery of patency and the achievement of cleaner canals, independently of the agitation instrument.Inês FerreiraPedro S. BaboAna Cristina BragaMaria Ascensão LopesManuela E. GomesIrene Pina-VazNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Inês Ferreira Pedro S. Babo Ana Cristina Braga Maria Ascensão Lopes Manuela E. Gomes Irene Pina-Vaz Supplementary solvent irrigation efficacy on filling remnants removal comparing XP-endo Finisher R vs IrriSafe
description	Abstract This study aimed to compare the efficacy of XP-endo Finisher R and IrriSafe, with a solvent mixture of Methyl ethyl ketone/Tetrachloroethylene (MEK/TCE), in the removal of root filling residues. Twenty-four human mandibular incisors were pair-matched by micro-computed tomography according to volume and aspect ratio. After retreatment, specimens were allocated to two experimental groups (n = 12), according to the supplementary instrument used. The volume of residual filling material after each irrigating step and the time for retreatment was calculated. Statistical analyses were carried out using Mann–Whitney test, with a significance level of 5%. The volume of initial root canal filling material between the groups was similar (p > 0.05). With the final irrigation protocol (NaOCl and EDTA) the volume of the filling remnants decreased significantly (p < 0.05) with no differences between IrriSafe or XP-endo Finisher R (p > 0.05). The additional solvent mixture MEK/TCE increased the efficiency of filling materials reduction, regardless of the agitating instruments employed, IrriSafe or XP-endo Finisher R (p < 0.05). There was no difference between the two groups regarding the time (p = 0.149). Both supplementary instruments were effective in the reduction of filling remnants. The additional step with a solvent mixture of MEK/TCE enabled a total recovery of patency and the achievement of cleaner canals, independently of the agitation instrument.
format	article
author	Inês Ferreira Pedro S. Babo Ana Cristina Braga Maria Ascensão Lopes Manuela E. Gomes Irene Pina-Vaz
author_facet	Inês Ferreira Pedro S. Babo Ana Cristina Braga Maria Ascensão Lopes Manuela E. Gomes Irene Pina-Vaz
author_sort	Inês Ferreira
title	Supplementary solvent irrigation efficacy on filling remnants removal comparing XP-endo Finisher R vs IrriSafe
title_short	Supplementary solvent irrigation efficacy on filling remnants removal comparing XP-endo Finisher R vs IrriSafe
title_full	Supplementary solvent irrigation efficacy on filling remnants removal comparing XP-endo Finisher R vs IrriSafe
title_fullStr	Supplementary solvent irrigation efficacy on filling remnants removal comparing XP-endo Finisher R vs IrriSafe
title_full_unstemmed	Supplementary solvent irrigation efficacy on filling remnants removal comparing XP-endo Finisher R vs IrriSafe
title_sort	supplementary solvent irrigation efficacy on filling remnants removal comparing xp-endo finisher r vs irrisafe
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/859ceb9f52ef47c89d397389acceb07c
work_keys_str_mv	AT inesferreira supplementarysolventirrigationefficacyonfillingremnantsremovalcomparingxpendofinisherrvsirrisafe AT pedrosbabo supplementarysolventirrigationefficacyonfillingremnantsremovalcomparingxpendofinisherrvsirrisafe AT anacristinabraga supplementarysolventirrigationefficacyonfillingremnantsremovalcomparingxpendofinisherrvsirrisafe AT mariaascensaolopes supplementarysolventirrigationefficacyonfillingremnantsremovalcomparingxpendofinisherrvsirrisafe AT manuelaegomes supplementarysolventirrigationefficacyonfillingremnantsremovalcomparingxpendofinisherrvsirrisafe AT irenepinavaz supplementarysolventirrigationefficacyonfillingremnantsremovalcomparingxpendofinisherrvsirrisafe
_version_	1718379716118839296

Supplementary solvent irrigation efficacy on filling remnants removal comparing XP-endo Finisher R vs IrriSafe

Ejemplares similares