Does sacral pulsed electromagnetic field therapy have a better effect than transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patients with neurogenic overactive bladder?

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMFT) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on neurogenic overactive bladder dysfunction (OAB) in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). Patients and methods: In all, 80 patients [50 men and 30 women,...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Lamyaa A. Fergany, Husain Shaker, Magdy Arafa, Mohamed S. Elbadry
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Taylor & Francis Group 2017
Materias:	Magnetic field therapy Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation Neurogenic overactive bladder Spinal cord injury Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology RC870-923
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/85b197282f6f45e6baaff56f5632b21d
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:85b197282f6f45e6baaff56f5632b21d
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:85b197282f6f45e6baaff56f5632b21d2021-12-02T10:50:51ZDoes sacral pulsed electromagnetic field therapy have a better effect than transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patients with neurogenic overactive bladder?2090-598X10.1016/j.aju.2017.01.007https://doaj.org/article/85b197282f6f45e6baaff56f5632b21d2017-06-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090598X17300347https://doaj.org/toc/2090-598XObjective: To compare the effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMFT) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on neurogenic overactive bladder dysfunction (OAB) in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). Patients and methods: In all, 80 patients [50 men and 30 women, with a mean (SD) age of 40.15 (8.76) years] with neurogenic OAB secondary to suprasacral SCI were included. They underwent urodynamic studies (UDS) before and after treatment. Patients were divided into two equal groups: Group A, comprised 40 patients who received 20 min of TENS (10 Hz with a 700 s generated pulse), three times per week for 20 sessions; Group B, comprised 40 patients who received PEMFT (15 Hz with 50% intensity output for 5 s/min for 20 min), three times per week for 20 sessions. Results: In Group B, there was a significant increase in the maximum cystometric capacity (P < 0.001), volume at first uninhibited detrusor contraction (P < 0.002), and maximum urinary flow rate (P < 0.02). Conclusion: The UDS showed that the effects of PEMFT in patients with neurogenic OAB secondary to suprasacral SCI was better than TENS for inducing an inhibitory effect on neurogenic detrusor overactivity.Lamyaa A. FerganyHusain ShakerMagdy ArafaMohamed S. ElbadryTaylor & Francis GrouparticleMagnetic field therapyTranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulationNeurogenic overactive bladderSpinal cord injuryDiseases of the genitourinary system. UrologyRC870-923ENArab Journal of Urology, Vol 15, Iss 2, Pp 148-152 (2017)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Magnetic field therapy Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation Neurogenic overactive bladder Spinal cord injury Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology RC870-923
spellingShingle	Magnetic field therapy Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation Neurogenic overactive bladder Spinal cord injury Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology RC870-923 Lamyaa A. Fergany Husain Shaker Magdy Arafa Mohamed S. Elbadry Does sacral pulsed electromagnetic field therapy have a better effect than transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patients with neurogenic overactive bladder?
description	Objective: To compare the effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMFT) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on neurogenic overactive bladder dysfunction (OAB) in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). Patients and methods: In all, 80 patients [50 men and 30 women, with a mean (SD) age of 40.15 (8.76) years] with neurogenic OAB secondary to suprasacral SCI were included. They underwent urodynamic studies (UDS) before and after treatment. Patients were divided into two equal groups: Group A, comprised 40 patients who received 20 min of TENS (10 Hz with a 700 s generated pulse), three times per week for 20 sessions; Group B, comprised 40 patients who received PEMFT (15 Hz with 50% intensity output for 5 s/min for 20 min), three times per week for 20 sessions. Results: In Group B, there was a significant increase in the maximum cystometric capacity (P < 0.001), volume at first uninhibited detrusor contraction (P < 0.002), and maximum urinary flow rate (P < 0.02). Conclusion: The UDS showed that the effects of PEMFT in patients with neurogenic OAB secondary to suprasacral SCI was better than TENS for inducing an inhibitory effect on neurogenic detrusor overactivity.
format	article
author	Lamyaa A. Fergany Husain Shaker Magdy Arafa Mohamed S. Elbadry
author_facet	Lamyaa A. Fergany Husain Shaker Magdy Arafa Mohamed S. Elbadry
author_sort	Lamyaa A. Fergany
title	Does sacral pulsed electromagnetic field therapy have a better effect than transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patients with neurogenic overactive bladder?
title_short	Does sacral pulsed electromagnetic field therapy have a better effect than transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patients with neurogenic overactive bladder?
title_full	Does sacral pulsed electromagnetic field therapy have a better effect than transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patients with neurogenic overactive bladder?
title_fullStr	Does sacral pulsed electromagnetic field therapy have a better effect than transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patients with neurogenic overactive bladder?
title_full_unstemmed	Does sacral pulsed electromagnetic field therapy have a better effect than transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patients with neurogenic overactive bladder?
title_sort	does sacral pulsed electromagnetic field therapy have a better effect than transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patients with neurogenic overactive bladder?
publisher	Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate	2017
url	https://doaj.org/article/85b197282f6f45e6baaff56f5632b21d
work_keys_str_mv	AT lamyaaafergany doessacralpulsedelectromagneticfieldtherapyhaveabettereffectthantranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationinpatientswithneurogenicoveractivebladder AT husainshaker doessacralpulsedelectromagneticfieldtherapyhaveabettereffectthantranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationinpatientswithneurogenicoveractivebladder AT magdyarafa doessacralpulsedelectromagneticfieldtherapyhaveabettereffectthantranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationinpatientswithneurogenicoveractivebladder AT mohamedselbadry doessacralpulsedelectromagneticfieldtherapyhaveabettereffectthantranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationinpatientswithneurogenicoveractivebladder
_version_	1718396542434410496

Does sacral pulsed electromagnetic field therapy have a better effect than transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patients with neurogenic overactive bladder?

Ejemplares similares