Nectar Chemistry or Flower Morphology—What Is More Important for the Reproductive Success of Generalist Orchid <i>Epipactis palustris</i> in Natural and Anthropogenic Populations?
The aim of this study was to determine the level of reproductive success (RS) in natural and anthropogenic populations of generalist orchid <i>Epipactis palustris</i> and its dependence on flower structure and nectar composition, i.e., amino acids and sugars. We found that both pollinari...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/85b68572577540b4bb5d73c5af0c32e3 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | The aim of this study was to determine the level of reproductive success (RS) in natural and anthropogenic populations of generalist orchid <i>Epipactis palustris</i> and its dependence on flower structure and nectar composition, i.e., amino acids and sugars. We found that both pollinaria removal and female reproductive success were high and similar in all populations, despite differences in flower traits and nectar chemistry. Flower structures were weakly correlated with parameters of RS. Nectar traits were more important in shaping RS; although, we noted differentiated selection on nectar components in distinct populations. Individuals in natural populations produced nectar with a larger amount of sugars and amino acids. The sucrose to (fructose and glucose) ratio in natural populations was close to 1, while in anthropogenic ones, a clear domination of fructose and glucose was noted. Our results indicate that the flower traits and nectar composition of <i>E. palustris</i> reflect its generalist character and meet the requirements of a wide range of pollinators, differing according to body sizes, mouth apparatus, and dietary needs. Simultaneously, differentiation of nectar chemistry suggests a variation of pollinator assemblages in particular populations or domination of their some groups. To our knowledge, a comparison of nectar chemistry between natural and anthropogenic populations of orchids is reported for the first time in this paper. |
|---|