Laparoscopic Versus Open Abdominal Repair of Incisional Hernia

Background: Incisional hernia is a common health problem and its method of repair [open or laparoscopic] is still under debate. Aim of the work: To evaluate the technique and results of the laparoscopic and the open abdominal incisional hernia repair. Patients and methods: This is a retrospective s...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Ahmed Ibrahim Saad, Gamal El-sayed Almaadawy, Ayman Mahmoud Elwan
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Al-Azhar University, Faculty of Medicine (Damietta) 2021
Materias:	hernia incisional recurrence risk open repair laparoscopic repair Medicine (General) R5-920
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/86069c388e284cc3bdfb4c7ea1765e6a
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:86069c388e284cc3bdfb4c7ea1765e6a
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:86069c388e284cc3bdfb4c7ea1765e6a2021-12-02T15:42:47ZLaparoscopic Versus Open Abdominal Repair of Incisional Hernia2636-41742682-378010.21608/ijma.2021.44218.1182https://doaj.org/article/86069c388e284cc3bdfb4c7ea1765e6a2021-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://ijma.journals.ekb.eg/article_163319_c6395e2b50907d886fc533fbd69ea7ae.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2636-4174https://doaj.org/toc/2682-3780Background: Incisional hernia is a common health problem and its method of repair [open or laparoscopic] is still under debate. Aim of the work: To evaluate the technique and results of the laparoscopic and the open abdominal incisional hernia repair. Patients and methods: This is a retrospective study conducted on 40 patients with abdominal incisional hernia, admitted to general surgery department of Al-Azhar University Hospital [Damietta]. All records were reviewed for patient demographics, preoperative evaluation, operative and postoperative data. The complications were reviewed and compared between groups. These complications included ileus, cellulitis, flap necrosis, infection, hematoma, seroma, cyst, recurrence and other injuries. Results: The open group had a shorter operative time than the laparoscopic group [85.3±13.21 vs 110.0±10.04 minutes, respectively]. However, time to oral intake [hours] and the duration of hospital stay [days] were significantly shorter in the laparoscopic when compared to the open group [9.20±1.2, 1.92±0.69 vs 20.0±2.4 and 2.70±0.68 respectively]. Postoperative complications showed no significant difference between groups. Conclusion: Thelaparoscopic repair of incisional hernia is a safe and effective alternative to the open repair with a shorter hospital stay, early oral feeding and a lower rate of complications.Ahmed Ibrahim SaadGamal El-sayed AlmaadawyAyman Mahmoud ElwanAl-Azhar University, Faculty of Medicine (Damietta)articleherniaincisionalrecurrence riskopen repairlaparoscopic repairMedicine (General)R5-920ENInternational Journal of Medical Arts, Vol 3, Iss 2, Pp 1463-1470 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	hernia incisional recurrence risk open repair laparoscopic repair Medicine (General) R5-920
spellingShingle	hernia incisional recurrence risk open repair laparoscopic repair Medicine (General) R5-920 Ahmed Ibrahim Saad Gamal El-sayed Almaadawy Ayman Mahmoud Elwan Laparoscopic Versus Open Abdominal Repair of Incisional Hernia
description	Background: Incisional hernia is a common health problem and its method of repair [open or laparoscopic] is still under debate. Aim of the work: To evaluate the technique and results of the laparoscopic and the open abdominal incisional hernia repair. Patients and methods: This is a retrospective study conducted on 40 patients with abdominal incisional hernia, admitted to general surgery department of Al-Azhar University Hospital [Damietta]. All records were reviewed for patient demographics, preoperative evaluation, operative and postoperative data. The complications were reviewed and compared between groups. These complications included ileus, cellulitis, flap necrosis, infection, hematoma, seroma, cyst, recurrence and other injuries. Results: The open group had a shorter operative time than the laparoscopic group [85.3±13.21 vs 110.0±10.04 minutes, respectively]. However, time to oral intake [hours] and the duration of hospital stay [days] were significantly shorter in the laparoscopic when compared to the open group [9.20±1.2, 1.92±0.69 vs 20.0±2.4 and 2.70±0.68 respectively]. Postoperative complications showed no significant difference between groups. Conclusion: Thelaparoscopic repair of incisional hernia is a safe and effective alternative to the open repair with a shorter hospital stay, early oral feeding and a lower rate of complications.
format	article
author	Ahmed Ibrahim Saad Gamal El-sayed Almaadawy Ayman Mahmoud Elwan
author_facet	Ahmed Ibrahim Saad Gamal El-sayed Almaadawy Ayman Mahmoud Elwan
author_sort	Ahmed Ibrahim Saad
title	Laparoscopic Versus Open Abdominal Repair of Incisional Hernia
title_short	Laparoscopic Versus Open Abdominal Repair of Incisional Hernia
title_full	Laparoscopic Versus Open Abdominal Repair of Incisional Hernia
title_fullStr	Laparoscopic Versus Open Abdominal Repair of Incisional Hernia
title_full_unstemmed	Laparoscopic Versus Open Abdominal Repair of Incisional Hernia
title_sort	laparoscopic versus open abdominal repair of incisional hernia
publisher	Al-Azhar University, Faculty of Medicine (Damietta)
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/86069c388e284cc3bdfb4c7ea1765e6a
work_keys_str_mv	AT ahmedibrahimsaad laparoscopicversusopenabdominalrepairofincisionalhernia AT gamalelsayedalmaadawy laparoscopicversusopenabdominalrepairofincisionalhernia AT aymanmahmoudelwan laparoscopicversusopenabdominalrepairofincisionalhernia
_version_	1718385817766854656

Laparoscopic Versus Open Abdominal Repair of Incisional Hernia

Ejemplares similares