Poor prey quality is compensated by higher provisioning effort in passerine birds

Abstract In altricial avian species, nutrition can significantly impact nestling fitness by increasing their survival and recruitment chances after fledging. Therefore, the effort invested by parents towards provisioning nestlings is crucial and represents a critical link between habitat resources a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sarah Senécal, Julie-Camille Riva, Ryan S. O’Connor, Fanny Hallot, Christian Nozais, François Vézina
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/863f06196f794c9bb9f4a2f43f80e852
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:863f06196f794c9bb9f4a2f43f80e852
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:863f06196f794c9bb9f4a2f43f80e8522021-12-02T15:00:55ZPoor prey quality is compensated by higher provisioning effort in passerine birds10.1038/s41598-021-90658-w2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/863f06196f794c9bb9f4a2f43f80e8522021-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90658-whttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract In altricial avian species, nutrition can significantly impact nestling fitness by increasing their survival and recruitment chances after fledging. Therefore, the effort invested by parents towards provisioning nestlings is crucial and represents a critical link between habitat resources and reproductive success. Recent studies suggest that the provisioning rate has little or no effect on the nestling growth rate. However, these studies do not consider prey quality, which may force breeding pairs to adjust provisioning rates to account for variation in prey nutritional value. In this 8-year study using black-capped (Poecile atricapillus) and boreal (Poecile hudsonicus) chickadees, we hypothesized that provisioning rates would negatively correlate with prey quality (i.e., energy content) across years if parents adjust their effort to maintain nestling growth rates. The mean daily growth rate was consistent across years in both species. However, prey energy content differed among years, and our results showed that parents brought more food to the nest and fed at a higher rate in years of low prey quality. This compensatory effect likely explains the lack of relationship between provisioning rate and growth rate reported in this and other studies. Therefore, our data support the hypothesis that parents increase provisioning efforts to compensate for poor prey quality and maintain offspring growth rates.Sarah SenécalJulie-Camille RivaRyan S. O’ConnorFanny HallotChristian NozaisFrançois VézinaNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Sarah Senécal
Julie-Camille Riva
Ryan S. O’Connor
Fanny Hallot
Christian Nozais
François Vézina
Poor prey quality is compensated by higher provisioning effort in passerine birds
description Abstract In altricial avian species, nutrition can significantly impact nestling fitness by increasing their survival and recruitment chances after fledging. Therefore, the effort invested by parents towards provisioning nestlings is crucial and represents a critical link between habitat resources and reproductive success. Recent studies suggest that the provisioning rate has little or no effect on the nestling growth rate. However, these studies do not consider prey quality, which may force breeding pairs to adjust provisioning rates to account for variation in prey nutritional value. In this 8-year study using black-capped (Poecile atricapillus) and boreal (Poecile hudsonicus) chickadees, we hypothesized that provisioning rates would negatively correlate with prey quality (i.e., energy content) across years if parents adjust their effort to maintain nestling growth rates. The mean daily growth rate was consistent across years in both species. However, prey energy content differed among years, and our results showed that parents brought more food to the nest and fed at a higher rate in years of low prey quality. This compensatory effect likely explains the lack of relationship between provisioning rate and growth rate reported in this and other studies. Therefore, our data support the hypothesis that parents increase provisioning efforts to compensate for poor prey quality and maintain offspring growth rates.
format article
author Sarah Senécal
Julie-Camille Riva
Ryan S. O’Connor
Fanny Hallot
Christian Nozais
François Vézina
author_facet Sarah Senécal
Julie-Camille Riva
Ryan S. O’Connor
Fanny Hallot
Christian Nozais
François Vézina
author_sort Sarah Senécal
title Poor prey quality is compensated by higher provisioning effort in passerine birds
title_short Poor prey quality is compensated by higher provisioning effort in passerine birds
title_full Poor prey quality is compensated by higher provisioning effort in passerine birds
title_fullStr Poor prey quality is compensated by higher provisioning effort in passerine birds
title_full_unstemmed Poor prey quality is compensated by higher provisioning effort in passerine birds
title_sort poor prey quality is compensated by higher provisioning effort in passerine birds
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/863f06196f794c9bb9f4a2f43f80e852
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahsenecal poorpreyqualityiscompensatedbyhigherprovisioningeffortinpasserinebirds
AT juliecamilleriva poorpreyqualityiscompensatedbyhigherprovisioningeffortinpasserinebirds
AT ryansoconnor poorpreyqualityiscompensatedbyhigherprovisioningeffortinpasserinebirds
AT fannyhallot poorpreyqualityiscompensatedbyhigherprovisioningeffortinpasserinebirds
AT christiannozais poorpreyqualityiscompensatedbyhigherprovisioningeffortinpasserinebirds
AT francoisvezina poorpreyqualityiscompensatedbyhigherprovisioningeffortinpasserinebirds
_version_ 1718389149601366016